• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Name Women Alive or Deceased, That You Believe Would Have Been A Great President

rhinefire

rhinefire

DP Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
10,409
Reaction score
3,023
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
Hillary is exempt because of her status as a probable.
 
There weren't any. There aren't any and there never will be any. POTUS is not a position that women are prepared to undertake. It does not fall into their proper place in the world. Sorry but that's just the way things are. [/Thread]
 
rhinefire said:
Hillary is exempt because of her status as a probable.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, Comparatively, Daisy Duck who could fill the administration with Mickey Mouse, Goofy, Donald Duck, and The Mousekateers.


Actually, I suggest Golda Meir, Nellie Taloe Ross, Minnie Davenport Craig

Possibly better and certainly not lesser than the lesser ones we have had in office.

Thom Paine
 
Tigger said:
There weren't any. There aren't any and there never will be any. POTUS is not a position that women are prepared to undertake. It does not fall into their proper place in the world. Sorry but that's just the way things are. [/Thread]
Click to expand...


americanwoman 2020 [/Thread]
 
americanwoman said:
Hit me with your best shot. I've dodged a bullet before and I'll do it again.
Click to expand...

Who suggested bullets. I'd be all for seeing a nuclear weapon go off on The Mall in Washington, DC if a woman were ever elected POTUS.
 
Tigger said:
Who suggested bullets. I'd be all for seeing a nuclear weapon go off on The Mall in Washington, DC if a woman were ever elected POTUS.
Click to expand...

holy ****, you actually support murdering thousands and thousands of innocent people because of that??? :lol: :lol:
 
Elanor Roosevelt seems an obvious choice.
 
There are plenty of great women but no great Presidents. No self-respecting woman or man would touch that poisoned challis.
 
americanwoman said:
holy ****, you actually support murdering thousands and thousands of innocent people because of that??? :lol: :lol:
Click to expand...

I support getting rid of anyone and everyone who votes for ANY female candidate AND those people around them who allow them to cast those votes.

Heck, I refused to vote for a semi-Conservative female State Representative candidate back in 2008 who was my neighbor and was more or less in-line with most of my political views because she was female.
 
Tigger said:
I support getting rid of anyone and everyone who votes for ANY female candidate AND those people around them who allow them to cast those votes.
Click to expand...

How will you know how people will vote or just blow up all in hopes to catch a few?

Wouldn't it be soooo very funny if you did that then found out they all voted for the guy?


Yup a guy in charge, no matter which guy it might be, is so much more of a rational thinker than a woman.
 
Tigger said:
Who suggested bullets. I'd be all for seeing a nuclear weapon go off on The Mall in Washington, DC if a woman were ever elected POTUS.
Click to expand...

:shock:

Wow, never consider yourself a patriot then. So glad the likes of you are dying off and stigmatized.
 
this thread needs more estrogen.
 
This thread was always succeptible to a severe case of tiggeritis.
 
Ben K. said:
This thread was always succeptible to a severe case of tiggeritis.
Click to expand...

I find completely ignoring the Tigger posts works best. It's not like you would be missing out on an opportunity to repond to something intelligent
 
americanwoman said:
How will you know how people will vote or just blow up all in hopes to catch a few?
Click to expand...

If all the voters who you can't guarantee voted for the male candidate are dead, you're 100% certain that you got all the ones who voted for her.

americanwoman said:
Yup a guy in charge, no matter which guy it might be, is so much more of a rational thinker than a woman.
Click to expand...

Any man over any woman. That's 100% correct.


Lachean said:
:shock: Wow, never consider yourself a patriot then. So glad the likes of you are dying off and stigmatized.
Click to expand...

Don't be so certain that we're as much on our deathbed as you may think.... in both genders.
 
rjay said:
I find completely ignoring the Tigger posts works best. It's not like you would be missing out on an opportunity to repond to something intelligent
Click to expand...

I regularly extoll the virtue of all members adding me to their Ignore List, rjay.
 
I happen to think Barbara Bush is one of the few American women who has the balls to be a great American President. The woman takes no **** from anyone - she tells it like it is - she treats the media like the scum they are - and she married a great man, helped mold him in later years, and gave birth to one pretty good President and will be the mother of a second President in 2016.

She's smart enough to know she's not smart enough to know everything - something sorely lacking in the current holder of the office - and she'd have a great cadre of confidants who held the office and other high offices, who are familiar with the major players in the world, and who would be great at helping her "woman/man" a cabinet.
 
CanadaJohn said:
gave birth to one pretty good President and will be the mother of a second President in 2016.
Click to expand...

After reading this, I had to look around to make sure everyone wasn't suddenly sporting goatees.
 
americanwoman said:
Maybe I'm a little biased but I'd like to think I'd be a much better candidate for instance than this guy:

:2razz:
Click to expand...

It's not about qualifications. It's not about who CAN do what. It's about who SHOULD do what. Always has been.
 
Tigger said:
It's not about qualifications. It's not about who CAN do what. It's about who SHOULD do what. Always has been.
Click to expand...

So what should a woman do? Because anything a woman should do, a man can and should also do and vice versa. I shouldn't and won't do anything I don't want to do and I will do what I want. Don't like it? Good.
 
americanwoman said:
So what should a woman do? Because anything a woman should do, a man can and should also do and vice versa. I shouldn't and won't do anything I don't want to do and I will do what I want. Don't like it? Good.
Click to expand...

That's fine. You have a right to your opinion on the matter. I could not disagree any more with that view, but that is my perogative as well. I see your opinion quite often in women these days. That's why I no longer hold doors for women, stop to help them on the side of the road, or anything else "chivalrous" in nature, unless I am well aware of their views and actions. If women no longer want to act like Ladies, they should not expect males to act like Gentlemen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom