DDD
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Messages
- 12,351
- Reaction score
- 1,918
- Location
- Republic of Dardania
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It is not atheist books as much as it is dogma, religious books themselves, and lack of reason in them to believe the stories as a way of life to begin with that put me away from faith. Why should I believe it because it is written sometimes very idiotically in a religious book? Somethings downright insult my intelligence just for reading it. For me religious books are books written for slaves whom must give up in this life and adjust to the unsatisfying things in this life and be fooled that they will have it better in afterlife.
But the most things that put me away from religion is the communications that I use to make with its representatives as well followers. The points, issues, "counterarguments" are really a very great struggle to level with much less understand. They are based severely on the assumption that if there was no religion man is lowest scum sucking dip **** that could not possibly be even imagined. But it is religion itself that keeps man from undergoing these presumed innate tendencies to do lower than animal immoral behaviors.
These are the means that religions emphasizes their role. Sadly though it works. Like I was speaking to another religious person the other day, I was speaking about why I do not need religion for I have no need to be bound by its limitations. The counterargument came fiercely that to the contrary I need religion because "one cannot be as free, for if one was free they would do horrible things such as take a crap in public eye, on front of everyone, right in the middle of the city center."
Clearly assumptions do not meet. I assume that people learn potty training from parents, or caregivers, while the other party stressed that it is religion's work to teach you where to **** otherwise they would go to hell. At one point one just cannot continue with this form of communications and leaves them be (sometimes disgusted from attempting to do so in the first place!).
But the most things that put me away from religion is the communications that I use to make with its representatives as well followers. The points, issues, "counterarguments" are really a very great struggle to level with much less understand. They are based severely on the assumption that if there was no religion man is lowest scum sucking dip **** that could not possibly be even imagined. But it is religion itself that keeps man from undergoing these presumed innate tendencies to do lower than animal immoral behaviors.
These are the means that religions emphasizes their role. Sadly though it works. Like I was speaking to another religious person the other day, I was speaking about why I do not need religion for I have no need to be bound by its limitations. The counterargument came fiercely that to the contrary I need religion because "one cannot be as free, for if one was free they would do horrible things such as take a crap in public eye, on front of everyone, right in the middle of the city center."
Clearly assumptions do not meet. I assume that people learn potty training from parents, or caregivers, while the other party stressed that it is religion's work to teach you where to **** otherwise they would go to hell. At one point one just cannot continue with this form of communications and leaves them be (sometimes disgusted from attempting to do so in the first place!).
Last edited: