I don't even see creationism and evolution as being in the same universe.
First of all, they aren't necessarily talking about the same thing. Creationism is mostly about how life began. Evolution has nothing to do with that. That's abiogenesis, which is a totally difference field of biology. Evolution is about how life changed over time. The only time when creationism and evolution even come into contact with each other is if someone says current life forms have always existed in their present state. In which case -- and excuse my bluntness -- but that is just ridiculous, with everything we know now. It doesn't even warrant a response.
Second, this is a scientific theory vs. a creation myth from 2,000 years ago. These are two fundamentally different conversations that don't belong in the same breath together. They just don't. Because if someone wants to believe a creation myth, you can throw all the facts in the world at them and it makes no difference. If you want to have a real discussion, you have to be open to argumentation and evidence. Creationists aren't. And most scientifically minded people aren't open to creation myths, either. This is a conversation that goes nowhere, because they are in totally different worlds in terms of how they see basic reality. And honestly, engaging creation myths as though they're on par with scientific research is insulting to science.
As for myself, I accept evolution. We don't yet know the exact mechanism of abiogenesis, so I will withhold believing anything until we do. I don't think that plopping in some "god of the gaps" belief is an acceptable placeholder for real information, so I simply have no opinion for the time being.