Re: What is a Libertarian? Do you agree with them on economy,energy,foreign policy,dr
Joechilli said:
What do you class as a modern Libertarian? Can you really be Right or Left leaning as a Libertarian?
I pretty much skipped over the whole libertarian thing. It didn't make much sense to me beyond the two or three months I attempted to label myself as such. The problem with someone labeling oneself as a libertarian is that it forces a person to categorize their beliefs based on a faulty premise. Allow me to explain.
In my view, libertarians are often simply Demoblicans (Republicans and Democrats) who are disheartened by some aspect of their chosen party or politics in general. They see how the government has become an all-encompassing Leviathan in the daily lives of everyone within America and desire an expansion of their individual liberty in one or more facets. Obviously, the area in which they desire more autonomy is the determining factor of being labeled "left" or "right" leaning.
So why do I consider libertarians to be sadly confused and unfortunate individuals? Because they haven't quite made the realization of
why they are so miserable and fed up with the political system. It is difficult to put in words my thought processes at this point so perhaps a brief explanation for each of the listed items will assist in making this a bit more clear.
Joechilli said:
What are your views on:
Economy
As Viktyr almost got right, generally the left/right divide on the economy is over
how the government should manipulate the economy. Never is the question asked,
should the government manipulate the economy. Lefties desire punitive actions on "exploitative" corporations despite the fact that those businesses which actually do exploit workers and/or other businesses are only able to do so with government authority. Righties desire punitive measures on "unfair" competition by foreigners despite the fact that domestic businesses are at a competitive disadvantage in certain areas only due to government meddling in the first place.
I rarely hear anyone ask
why the government is involved in the economy in any capacity and demand an end to it.
Joechilli said:
Alternative energy vs Traditional fossil fuel
Excellent example of a false dichotomy. Someone who truly believe in libertarian ideals would say, "who cares?" This should be a non-issue. If property rights were actually sacrosanct, if individual contract was sovereign, and if arbitrary restrictions/subsidies were eliminated, nobody would even be considering this topic. A libertarian would simply ask what all the fuss was about since we don't continually argue over which aluminum alloy is best or which mixture of concrete is the strongest or which car lasts the longest. The answer is, the best source of energy for the given time and circumstances will always be utilized in an unhampered market. But this is never the question.
Joechilli said:
This is possibly the most enlightening topic of them all. From an individual perspective,
all action is "foreign policy." Once again, the left/right dichotomy dictates that one must either agree with politicians forcing foreigners to abide by rules or soldiers forcing foreigners to abide by rules. What about the simple policy of allowing other people to decide for themselves what to do? Most Americans I meet are arrogant enough to believe that they know what is best for the entire globe. I'm sure their attitude would change pretty quickly if nature had saw it fit to place their birth in a different nation. Foreign policy is only a topic because people are blind enough to believe that by accident of birth they are better than other humans.
Joechilli said:
Or more aptly, the War on Allowing People to Ingest, Inhale, or Inject What They Want. Quite simply, a war on liberty. Some left/right libs find it necessary to dictate which substances are okay or which methods of legalization are allowable or any number of asinine excuses. I don't think I have ever heard a libertarian ask
where in the Constitution the power to prohibit the use of certain substances is given to the government.
So I guess what I am trying to say is that a person who declares themselves to be a libertarian (i.e. one who espouses individual liberty) will, by logical conclusion, have no argument over
how a person's liberty ought to be restricted, but whether or not it
should be restricted. And if you get that far... well, you just walked yourself into anarchism.