True; agreed. That didn't start with Trump. It really started back in the 1990's.
Some outlets and talking heads do that garbage too much and as a result, I don't think of them as "news" - that includes the folks Trump loves on Fox.
Are you including every program on FOX? Every thought presented? Every story reported? How much FOX news do you watch?
Regarding Fake News, not long ago, maybe 100 years and ongoing back from there, journalism was ALL propaganda.
Newspapers were all produced by special interests whether they were political parties or biased organizations.
The good thing about this was that the bias someone preferred could be found and the lies balanced out.
Journalism as a profession led folks to create standards of ethics. These are used today, but often the "standards" are regarded more as guidelines and are often discarded.
"Remember the Maine" as a battle cry resulted from a manufactured bit of Fake news that led the US to a war. Fake news is nothing new.
Proper attribution is lost. I don't recall the first time I heard it reported that Trump's Chief of Staff would resign "soon", but it feels like it's been about 6 months. Who is the source that always gets this crap wrong? Why is that source continuously used?
Nobody would touch the reporting on the Dossier that is being used to bludgeon Trump, but when one backwater rag put it out, the rest "reported" what was reported in the rag.
Dan Rather literally makes crap up, the CBS editorial staff approves it and they broadcast it as fact when the whole thing is an intentional lie. This is disgusting.
The state of our journalism is such that Trump says "Fake News" is the enemy of the people and the media reports that Trump says a "free press" is the enemy of the people.
Can they REALLY not tell the difference? My guess is that they cannot. Additionally, they are trying to create or maintain a narrative and this fits the narrative only when they twist it.