- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 56,256
- Reaction score
- 24,933
Yes. I don’t think it’d be practical if the doctor had to allow enough time for every single vaccine recipient to receive detailed answers to any question they might have. There needs to be routes for patients to get that information if they want it, I just don’t see that as a viable means to achieve it.
It’d be on the box it came in. A random patient may or may not be able to interpret that information of course. That’s part of the problem I’m talking about. Even if the doctors spent time providing all of the information, many patients still wouldn’t be in a position to make an informed decision.
I totally agree with that in principle, the question is what practical outcome you’re expecting. As I said, when we’re dealing with a complex technical field, most of us are inevitably going to have to trust in what the experts in that field tell us to some extent.
Maybe it's the degree to which we trust that is the issue.
I have stories on how taking ownership of my own health and family members has been of great benefit. I blindly trust no one no matter the title. I know too much about people.
Funny story, one time in the ER a doctor is talking to me and says, "I see you have white coat-itiz." (meaning I was not agreeing with his evaluation blindly) i garbed him by his smock and said, "yes, and I got it from incompetent doctors." I was pissed and he saw that. It was true. I realized I had to take ownership of my condition or they'd kill me. There is more to the story but I'll leave it at that.
But still, I want to know what I was vaccinated against so I can apply it practically. Last year I avoided concerts, fast food and restaurant dinning for example. This year, with a good vaccine match I may not.