- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,075
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1.)It was not unto the 1990's that Saint John Paul II accepted the science fact, that earth goes around the sun as being true to the Catholic faith. And the actions of the Catholic faith attacking the earth going around the sun was a error of the church. Like you, it will take centuries to convinced of a science fact.
2.) My argument is going to be with the lesbian community within the LGBT community. The American and Canadian lesbian community is making strong inroads with being accepted into mainstream media and mainstream community. They are not selling lesbian porn movies at 2 for $10 of a DVD movie to be accepted into the mainstream of the Christian community or the mainstream of non gay and non lesbian people. If it was logical that lesbian porn movies are a positive to be accepted into the mainstream, it would have been done decades ago. In the lesbian community that has moved into the mainstream of social and cultural, are not pushing to have non gay and non lesbian to watch porn lesbian movies. In fact, it would drive them out of the mainstream and push them back years if they did so.
3.)There is a sex market with topless bars and adult bookstores with porn movies and books. That community is not in the socially accepted culture we have today. In fact, a lesbian working in the workforce today is more accepted, then a man that talks about his collection of lesbian porn movies. In fact, to be logical to find a troubled employee, a married lesbian that gets along with other women and does not talk about her personal sex life in detail is more accepted then a man watching porn. A unmarried male that talks about his collection of lesbian porn movies, would trouble the women workforce, as a man thinking of two women being compared to have sex with each other. Logic, who is the more troubled worker, the lesbian or the man watching lesbian porn movies. Clearly, the man.
1.) nope im a science guy im an engineer. So far you provided ZERO facts, science or basic common sense and logic to support your claim. we are waiting.
2.) LMAO nothing you said there supports your statement and makes it true . . . nothing
3.) Wow . . just wow . . again NOTHING in that statment supports your claim and make it rational . . ill ask you AGAIN
this was your statement:
"if another 52 year old male is watching porn: I would say he does not have a healthy relationship with women. If you are a male watching lesbian porn, your really have a poor relationships with women."
Im asking you what logic or facts do you base that on because i dont see any supportable ones at all