• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

1,000 children as young as 11 were allegedly drugged, beaten and raped over 40 years

SheWolf said:
Do you know if these rings are connected to Jimmy Savile rumors? He was a horrible person. It's sad he got away for so long and was in such high position in England.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. I believe they said his victims were from institutions including the BBC's broadcasting studios, 14 hospitals and 20 children's hospitals across England.
 
Desert Storm said:
No I don't, because I also find left-wing media highly unreliable (as in they try to hide things under the guise of political correctness).

I guess that makes us even
Click to expand...

The problem is that your source , and the source they quoted are known for stories that are not true. The fact you use that tabloid as a source and then are unable to show more reliable source is suspect. "Left wing' or 'Right wing' is not an issue. Not being a tabloid rag is.
 
calamity said:
Dude, it was you who brought up race :roll:



I was only reminding you that these people probably are white.
Click to expand...

As the standard leftist response every time this has been brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
VanceMack said:
As the standard leftist response every time this has been brought up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I haven't seen that anywhere.
 
calamity said:
The Mirror did the investigation, picking up what it considered loose ends left uncovered in the criminal trials from a few years ago. So, right now, this is the exclusive source claiming this extent of abuse.

1,000 children drugged, beaten and raped in Telford grooming scandal | Metro News
Click to expand...

The mirror is in the category of 'tabloid' and 'inaccurate facts' https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mirror/

That isn't to say that story is 'true' or 'not true'. It's just that all the sources so far being presented are on the list of 'mixed' facts.
 
RAMOSS said:
The problem is that your source , and the source they quoted are known for stories that are not true. The fact you use that tabloid as a source and then are unable to show more reliable source is suspect. "Left wing' or 'Right wing' is not an issue. Not being a tabloid rag is
Click to expand...
Not at all, it just means you refuse to accept a news article thats right-wing.

If this article were from a left-wing source, you would swallow it up hook, line and sinker
 
Desert Storm said:
Not at all, it just means you refuse to accept a news article thats right-wing.

If this article were from a left-wing source, you would swallow it up hook, line and sinker
Click to expand...

I am not accepting the mirror either, and that's left wing.
 
Desert Storm said:
Okay, so how do you know the mediabiasfactcheck.com is accurate???
Click to expand...

Because they give examples of the facts, and they are equal when calling both left and right sources on being 'mixed'. There are other sources too.. it's just a convenient one.

For example.. this is another source talking about specifically British newspapers, and all the sources discussing this are on the 'least reliable' list Which are the Best and Worst Newspapers in the UK?

So, that is two sources that are independent from each other that are making the same evaluation.
 
RAMOSS said:
Because they give examples of the facts, and they are equal when calling both left and right sources on being 'mixed'. There are other sources too.. it's just a convenient one.

For example.. this is another source talking about specifically British newspapers, and all the sources discussing this are on the 'least reliable' list Which are the Best and Worst Newspapers in the UK?

So, that is two sources that are independent from each other that are making the same evaluation.
Click to expand...
No, its just the sources that you CHOOSE to believe.

Who the hell knows which sources are truthfull, whether they be right-wing or left-wing??
 
Desert Storm said:
No, its just the sources that you CHOOSE to believe.

Who the hell knows which sources are truthfull, whether they be right-wing or left-wing??
Click to expand...

Well.. you look at the quality of the writing of those I point out as 'bad', you will notice one thing they have in common is being 'sensationalist'. If you want to accept those and reject 'left media' , and go with people who are mainly screw balls, go right ahead. These are sources that I have heard mentioned in contempt by a number of people from England too.
 
RAMOSS said:
Well.. you look at the quality of the writing of those I point out as 'bad', you will notice one thing they have in common is being 'sensationalist'. If you want to accept those and reject 'left media' , and go with people who are mainly screw balls, go right ahead. These are sources that I have heard mentioned in contempt by a number of people from England too
Click to expand...
All that you mention is not a matter of fact, its only a matter of opinion.

Its all whatever news source you choose to believe (but that might be a little too deep for you though)
 
Desert Storm said:
Not at all, it just means you refuse to accept a news article thats right-wing.

If this article were from a left-wing source, you would swallow it up hook, line and sinker
Click to expand...

The "Mirror" isn't right-wing. Have another desperate flail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom