• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Monarchy

C R O I X said:
I think you are right generally speaking. I didn't say the choice about monarch was from people or any other group. What I am saying is that it is an available choice when something drastic happens. When I talked about army dictatorship I was not referring specific to Sweden now a days but again in general terms.

Remember that society is in constant changing and in 20, 40 or 60 Years Sweden and any other country will very likely to be very different. What Sweden is now will not remain the same forever.

Remember also that sometimes people actually choose who will be in charge despite the control of such choice of the narrow few elite before. Venezuela is an example of it. If there was a monarch family in Venezuela would people choose to give power to them instead of the militar Hugo Chaves? I suspect the answer is Yes.
Click to expand...


Fair enough. In 20, 40 or 60 years Sweden will probably be an Islamic Republic and a benighted theocracy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom