• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Golden Rule

Nilly

stb
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
6,873
Reaction score
3,809
Location
DC
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Progressive
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The Evolution of Trust

Difficult to explain, but wow this is cool. A very clever take on the above, and reflective on today's media/political environment. Try it out!
 
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The Evolution of Trust

Difficult to explain, but wow this is cool. A very clever take on the above, and reflective on today's media/political environment. Try it out!

Yes. Cute.
 
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The Evolution of Trust

Difficult to explain, but wow this is cool. A very clever take on the above, and reflective on today's media/political environment. Try it out!

And I would add to this that globalization and the advent of the internet are very much intertwined in this. It's no coincidence that we've become less trustworthy as our circles of interaction grows hugely. Much easier to **** someone over who lives in a different city.
 
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

The Evolution of Trust

Difficult to explain, but wow this is cool. A very clever take on the above, and reflective on today's media/political environment. Try it out!

What a dumb game. It's DESIGNED so that cheaters win. It's not a illustration of anything other than the designer wanting to rationalize cheating.
 
What a dumb game. It's DESIGNED so that cheaters win. It's not a illustration of anything other than the designer wanting to rationalize cheating.

These games are done to gauge human responses, given a set of situations.
They're fairly good, but as always, they have limitations.

The intent of this one is to teach, imo, that people should attempt to understand one another and not always assume malice.
 
These games are done to gauge human responses, given a set of situations.
They're fairly good, but as always, they have limitations.

The intent of this one is to teach, imo, that people should attempt to understand one another and not always assume malice.

It also shows the meta-strategy for the Always Cheat: sow miscommunication
 
Back
Top Bottom