• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Interesting article on racism

Slingshot Bob

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
11,166
Reaction score
3,034
Location
A country liberals hate. America.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
https://www.thoughtco.com/reasons-not-to-call-someone-racist-2834957

This is a good article for people who loosely throw that card out to read. Doing so does a disservice to the discussion on genuine racism. Falsely branding people with that label is little better than actual racism itself.

FTR, I think hating an entire group based on race is idiotic. People should be given a chance based on individual merit, or lack thereof.
 
https://www.thoughtco.com/reasons-not-to-call-someone-racist-2834957

This is a good article for people who loosely throw that card out to read. Doing so does a disservice to the discussion on genuine racism. Falsely branding people with that label is little better than actual racism itself.

FTR, I think hating an entire group based on race is idiotic. People should be given a chance based on individual merit, or lack thereof.

It's ironic that you have posted a thoughtful article discussing the issue of racism, but have to include the qualifier that you are not, in fact, racist.

Interesting read.
 
It's ironic that you have posted a thoughtful article discussing the issue of racism, but have to include the qualifier that you are not, in fact, racist.

Interesting read.

So people like you don't throw the card out, have anything other than your deflection to contribute, thoughts on the article, perhaps?
 
So people like you don't throw the card out, have anything other than your deflection to contribute, thoughts on the article, perhaps?

I wasn't meaning it as a slight. I just thought it funny you felt that you had to put that qualifier in the post because you knew that someone who hop on here and call you a racist. Which, by the way, I did not.

My thoughts were posted. It was an interesting read.
 
I wasn't meaning it as a slight. I just thought it funny you felt that you had to put that qualifier in the post because you knew that someone who hop on here and call you a racist. Which, by the way, I did not.

My thoughts were posted. It was an interesting read.

My bad, just posting my personal feeling on the topic.
 
https://www.thoughtco.com/reasons-not-to-call-someone-racist-2834957

This is a good article for people who loosely throw that card out to read. Doing so does a disservice to the discussion on genuine racism. Falsely branding people with that label is little better than actual racism itself.

FTR, I think hating an entire group based on race is idiotic. People should be given a chance based on individual merit, or lack thereof.

I was expecting that article to define what racism actually is and point out how the definition has been expanded way beyond it's scope in recent years for mostly political reasons... Instead, the author seemed to give validity to the new definitions that have been created through the lens of political correctness. I found it rather disappointing.

In the article, it links to another piece that claims to define "racism", but gives credence to the false, contrived PC definitions. Here's a few examples taken from that article that I strongly disagree with:

It’s also worth noting that in response to living in a racially stratified society, people of color sometimes complain about whites. Typically, such complaints serve as coping mechanisms to withstand racism rather than as anti-white bias. Even when minorities are actually prejudiced against whites, they lack the institutional power to adversely affect whites’ lives.

What that is in effect saying, is that minorities who display prejudice against white people (the dictionary definition of racism) aren't racist... Only white people can be racists. That is a load of BS.

Then there's this on reverse racism:

"...as minorities become more prominent in society, more whites will argue that minorities are biased. Because people of color will surely gain more power over time, get used to hearing about “reverse racism.”

Now the author implies that many white people will falsely claim a minority to be a racist, out of fear that they are losing the racial majority and the power that goes along with it. He also implies that the term is predominantly white people complaining about affirmative action and social welfare programs.

The author seems to find reasons to dismiss accusations of racism when they are leveled toward a minority, but expands the definition when it's a white person who is being labeled as such. Needless to say, I was not impressed with the article, or it's author.


.
 
My Mother said; I say treat people as if you would like to be treated ...

My Grandmother said; it doesn't cost you anything to just be nice to people ...

My Father said; If they don't respect you, why would waist your respect on them ...

My Grandfather said; give on to those who have given to you ...


I say; if you got a problem with me, bring it, don't talk about it :mrgreen:
 
My Mother said; I say treat people as if you would like to be treated ...

My Grandmother said; it doesn't cost you anything to just be nice to people ...

My Father said; If they don't respect you, why would waist your respect on them ...

My Grandfather said; give on to those who have given to you ...


I say; if you got a problem with me, bring it, don't talk about it :mrgreen:

I feel the same way!
 
Back
Top Bottom