• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Photograph of Elizabeth Warren

Without knowing the context of the photograph, the only thing that can be accurately stated is that you concern yourself with really trivial things.

Eh. No big surprise.

Oh really? And you seem to concern yourself with really trivial things as well. Especially when the subject is an enemy. :roll: Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. Eh. No big surprise. :roll:

Wow. With all that money, you'd think they could get someone who wouldn't use such hamfisted lighting, wouldn't bleach out the center of her face (if the lighting were right, he/she wouldn't have to) and wouldn't have her looking so mannequin-esque.

I don't shoot as many portraits/fashion shots as I used to, but it doesn't take much to see this is crappy work.
 
Why would she be compared to a model? We could compare her to Trump seeing as they are both politicians.

Why do we need to pick apart any person's physical appearance no matter what their occupation?
 
What is she.....67? Looks good for 67.
 
Why do we need to pick apart any person's physical appearance no matter what their occupation?

You started the thread. Maybe you have the answer.
 
Who's next? Strom Thurmond?
 
I agree. It's pretty pathetic to pick apart someone's picture and make rude comments on their looks.

Thanks for exposing the partisan hackery of the left on DP. It really is astonishing.

It was hilarious to watch all the "photographic professionals" crawl out of the woodwork in the other thread. Yeah, that's believable. :lamo
 
Is there a point? Are you looking for people to say what you are doing is wrong?

I'll let you re-read the thread and figure it out for yourself.
 
Thanks for exposing the partisan hackery of the left on DP. It really is astonishing.

It was hilarious to watch all the "photographic professionals" crawl out of the woodwork in the other thread. Yeah, that's believable. :lamo

Yep -- immediately jumping in to criticize every tiny detail of the picture and her. Crickets from the same people on this thread. So predictable - so pathetic.
 
Yep -- immediately jumping in to criticize every tiny detail of the picture and her. Crickets from the same people on this thread. So predictable - so pathetic.

And the feigned ignorance that is so popular with lefties these daze. :rolleyes: I have to wonder if they realize how vacuous it makes them appear. I assume they don't give a crap. :doh
 
Oh really? And you seem to concern yourself with really trivial things as well. Especially when the subject is an enemy. :roll: Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. Eh. No big surprise. :roll:

You're confusing the criticism of the photographer with criticism of the woman's actual appearance.
 
View attachment 67215946

Have you all seen this? It's such an odd angle for a photograph. Is she leaning over and about to fall? Also, her earrings should've been silver with the cool-toned jacket she has on. She clearly doesn't know how to style herself. She has a dull, semi-creepy look in her eyes too like she'd rather be doing a rain dance instead of staring awkwardly into a camera. And let's not even talk about her hairstyle. Yeesh.

she appears to be missing her war paint :mrgreen:
 
You're confusing the criticism of the photographer with criticism of the woman's actual appearance.

I guess you missed all of the comments about her looks.
 
Ahhh. I see. I think I need to spend less time here. Too many people have gone off the deep end.


Not me -- I can't swim. For realz.
 
You're confusing the criticism of the photographer with criticism of the woman's actual appearance.

I just like admiring how people express themselves, not to be confused with criticism if you are talking about me by any chance.
 
Why no comments on how she looks?

Because she doesn't look like the skin on her face was stretched upwards? She looks normal...human. She's not a middle earth elf.
 
Back
Top Bottom