• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick Small

Andalublue said:
I think that's problem, ain't it?

Seriously though, I'm opposed to all non-consensual circumcision, but the scale of the injury caused by FGM is just incomparable with that of male circumcision.
Click to expand...

Not really. Like I said, just removing the clitoral hood is less serious than removing the foreskin. People have to stop thinking that FGM always involves removal of the clitoris.
 
Henrin said:
Not really. Like I said, just removing the clitoral hood is less serious than removing the foreskin. People have to stop thinking that FGM always involves removal of the clitoris.
Click to expand...

can you do a link for that please...removing the hood is defeating the purpose which is to ensure no sexual

I have looked and found nothing to suggest what you say (removal of the hood) so perhaps just link for us....thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom