• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick Small

Henrin said:
Not really. Studies have not found any noticeable differences between African American men and American white men in average size. What you're speaking towards is a myth pushed by porn and popular culture, not anything supported by hard data.
Click to expand...

HARD data. :lamo
 
Do you see ANY chicken here?
Huh?
HUH?
Fuhgeddaboutit!

 
beerftw said:
Shhhh quit bringing logic into a thread with no logic about peta who suffers from negative logic.
Click to expand...

PETA doesn't suffer from negative logic.

Their logic is in some undiscovered second dimension.
 
Tucker Case Sr. is Colonel Sanders?
 
Henrin said:
In other news having sex with a PETA member makes your dick explode.

See, I can make up random bull**** too.
Click to expand...

In other news, those who have taken up the plight of no male circumcision -- like it's right up the there female circumcision and other much more important human right violations -- are nothing but the whiniest of cry-baby fucknuts.
 
Middleground said:
In other news, those who have taken up the plight of no male circumcision -- like it's right up the there female circumcision and other much more important human right violations -- are nothing but the whiniest of cry-baby fucknuts.
Click to expand...

It depends on the type of female circumcision you're talking about. If we are just talking about the removal of the clitoral hood it's not as serious, while if we are dealing with removal of clitoris itself, it's much worse. As it stands, all types of FGM are banned, while MGM is still legal and done to about 50% of boys in the US and about 30% in the world.

There is also nothing wrong with accurately comparing things like I just did above.
 
Henrin said:
It depends on the type of female circumcision you're talking about. If we are just talking about the removal of the clitoral hood it's not as serious, while if we are dealing with removal of clitoris itself, it's much worse. As it stands, all types of FGM are banned, while MGM is still legal and done to about 50% of boys in the US and about 30% in the world.

There is also nothing wrong with accurately comparing things like I just did above.
Click to expand...

Talk to the 13 year old girl who got her clit cut off with a dull razor. Beside your idiotic self, I know of no other circumcised male who has experienced any continuous pain and infection nor any emotional scars from being circumcised soon after leaving the womb. Sure I have hear of a few mistakes where too much was cut off... but the numbers are very very small.
 
Middleground said:
Talk to the 13 year old girl who got her clit cut off with a dull razor. Beside your idiotic self, I know of no other circumcised male who has experienced any continuous pain and infection nor any emotional scars from being circumcised soon after leaving the womb. Sure I have hear of a few mistakes where too much was cut off... but the numbers are very very small.
Click to expand...

Well, first off, I'm not circumcised. Just because I fight for male rights doesn't mean I was abused by my parents or that I'm not whole.

Second, you're wrong:

Male Circumcision: Pain, Trauma and Psychosexual Sequelae

Third, I already said it wasn't as bad getting your clitoris cut off. There is different degrees of FGM that involve the removal different parts. As I said, removal of the clitoral hood is not as serious as male circumcision, while removing the clitoris is much worse.

You should also be aware that infections are actually not all that uncommon after the surgery.

On a side note, you seem to remember things for a very long time. I'm not sure if I like it or hate it. :D
 
Last edited:
Henrin said:
Well, first off, I'm not circumcised. Just because I fight for male rights doesn't mean I was abused by my parents or that I'm not whole.

Second, you're wrong:

Male Circumcision: Pain, Trauma and Psychosexual Sequelae

Third, I already said it wasn't as bad getting your clitoris cut off. There is different degrees of FGM that involve the removal different parts. As I said, removal of the clitoral hood is not as serious as male circumcision, while removing the clitoris is much worse.

You should also be aware that infections are actually not all that uncommon after the surgery.

On a side note, you seem to remember things for a very long time. I'm not sure if I like it or hate it. :D
Click to expand...

I looked at that site, it does not appear to be reliable, or balanced. It seems to be a propaganda site as a matter of fact... a poorly done one at that.
 
RAMOSS said:
I looked at that site, it does not appear to be reliable, or balanced. It seems to be a propaganda site as a matter of fact... a poorly done one at that.
Click to expand...

Everything listed on the site is accurate and well sourced. :shrug:

Anyway, here is another source that goes over the same information that you won't like:

http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/goldman_1999.pdf

If you don't like the sources I'm providing search for Psychological Effects of Male
Infant Circumcision yourself.
 
Circumcision literally exists because one ****ing guy convinced people that it would stop their children from masturbating.
 
Deuce said:
Circumcision literally exists because one ****ing guy convinced people that it would stop their children from masturbating.
Click to expand...

Surely, this man was an utter paragon of trollishness! I cannot imagine any greater master of misinformation and insanity to model my life after - pray tell, who is this miraculous man?
 
Henrin said:
It depends on the type of female circumcision you're talking about. If we are just talking about the removal of the clitoral hood it's not as serious, while if we are dealing with removal of clitoris itself, it's much worse. As it stands, all types of FGM are banned, while MGM is still legal and done to about 50% of boys in the US and about 30% in the world.

There is also nothing wrong with accurately comparing things like I just did above.
Click to expand...


Other than that the comparison is massively faulty?
 
Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick… Small.

Probably a good thing if you have girls then. Unless...:roll:
 
Mr Person said:
Other than that the comparison is massively faulty?
Click to expand...

I was only comparing things in terms of loss of function. :shrug: If you look at it that way some forms of FGM are pretty minor in comparison.
 
Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick Small.

That's BS or blacks wouldn't have huge dicks..

JK.. You know that's funny..
 
What does chicken taste like?
 
Middleground said:
Sure I have hear of a few mistakes where too much was cut off... but the numbers are very very small.
Click to expand...
I think that's problem, ain't it?

Seriously though, I'm opposed to all non-consensual circumcision, but the scale of the injury caused by FGM is just incomparable with that of male circumcision.
 
imyoda said:
PETA Just Made A Very Bizarre Claim About What Eating Chicken Will Do To You | IFLScience
Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick Small.”

PETA Just Made a Very Bizarre Claim About What Eating Chicken Will Do to You

“……People become vegetarians for many reasons: concerns about animal welfare, concerns about the environment, and even simply concerns about their health. Well, how about anxieties about your unborn child’s penis? That’s the message PETA posted to Facebook in a video called “Eating Chicken Can Make Your Kid's Dick”… Small.”

“According to their video, phthalate – a family of chemicals used in plastics, paints and packaging – leads to male children being born with a smaller penis. The video goes on to say that these phthalates have been found in chicken flesh. In their words: “The more chicken consumed, the smaller the dick.”

The study PETA is referring to is a 2008 report by the National Institute of Health. The report manuscript itself doesn’t make any explicit link between chicken and a child's penis size, or in fact any reference to chicken at all. ………….

Ben Williamson, senior international media director at PETA, told VICE: “PETA’s humorous new video is simply trying to warn potential new parents about the link between eating chicken and stunted penis growth. Chicken flesh has been shown to cause higher levels of the phthalate Mono(2-ethylhexyl), or MEHP as it’s better known. That’s a fancy name for a chemical that can shrink the penises of unborn children.”

He concluded, “Our new ad is simply trying to help people who are concerned about the development of their unborn child. It’s a humorous video with a serious message.”



OH DEAR ME………………………I just had chicken for dinner!
Click to expand...

That is not good news for KFC.
 
Gathomas88 said:
I knew there was a reason I never liked chicken!

Beef all the way, baby! :lol:
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, if PETA can be believed...
peta.billboard.original.jpg


And there's this little gem which I am sure was fun for parents to explain to kids during Christmas (first caught it on Pen and Teller's Bull**** though the billboard looked a little different):
Santa-Not-Coming.png


And then there's my favorite bit of PETA hypocrisy.
So its Ok to kill animals as long as its to save a PETA operative's life. :D
Mary Beth Sweetland Hypocrite or Savior to All Animal Kind?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom