• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Secret Soviet Marxist Plan to Crush European civilization in 7 Days

Litwin said:
wrong.
until end of 16c (when eastern Rome for huge bribe recognized Muscovite church) they were Nestarians , 1917- 1986 satanic Marxist atheists

Down with God! How the Soviet Union took on religion – in pictures | Art and design | The Guardian
Click to expand...

Wrong again.

The Russia. Orthodox Church had its roots in the Christian conversion of the Kievian Rus.

The Nestorians were but a sect.

By the end of the fourteenth century, however, the Nestorian and other churches—which at one time had dotted the landscape of all of Central and even parts of East Asia—were all but wiped out

And 1917-1991 the Russian Orthodox Church continued to survive.
 
Fledermaus said:
In other words it was still the USSR.


History hates you.
Click to expand...

no it was not your stalinist sovok , it was dead body of stalinist sovok with 15 already independent countries, BMW on the streets etc

Qjglq5nzml8A0Wji_0nbtIWsn937nBn8S9LQTxMBoJM.jpg
 
Jredbaron96 said:
A wargaming magazine may make for some interesting speculation but it's hardly a solid source when it comes to real life, especially given that every actual warplan we have from the Soviets make clear their intent to utilize nuclear weapons from the get-go.

The Soviets did not share the American belief that a conventional war between the WARPAC and NATO was possible. Their theories of nuclearization of the battlefield all rested on the principle that a nuclear exchange between nuclear powers was inevitable and that there was no tangible distinction between a tactical or strategic exchange. The closest we got was their plans to strike non-Nuclear members of NATO in the hope that the rest (UK, USA, France) would pause before risking total nuclear annihilation.
Click to expand...

Indeed France has a first use nuclear strike policy and doctrine the instant Russian Federation -- or USSR troops of the nuclear period before the RF -- crossed their border into any European country nuclear armed or not. Presently any country considered to be under the influence of RF or actively supportive of it is subject to France striking the country with nuclear devices under any such Russian conventional invasion.

Kremlin knows this of course as does Nato and indeed the world knows the French policy to press the button (as it were) the instant Russian forces cross their border into any country in an attack against Europe. All France would need to know from its own intelligence agencies and operatives is that a Russian move would be against Europe in contrast to a single given country that might border Russia, such as Ukraine for instance.

Kremlin knowing this would need to go nuclear to begin with if it thought it could gain anything by it. What's encouraging about the Russians with their nuclear weapons is that during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 the Kremlin recognized JFK had determined to go all the way which made the Politburo see the light and settle the crisis without any serious shots being fired never mind nukes flying. Kennedy was the guy who was fatalistic, not the Russians and it worked out nearly perfectly in avoiding the worst.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom