• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Secret Soviet Marxist Plan to Crush European civilization in 7 Days

Who forced the USSR to crumble?
question is how the slave driven backward Marxist ulus could survive for so long. yes we all know Muscovite the born poodle slaves (product of mongol selection) but 75 years work for free is a bit too much even for them
1b0c0e0914c8c17c244a9f785a56a065.jpg

DpiJR1SWkAESEeC.jpg
 
What conventional only operations are you referring to? The Soviets did not consider the possibility of a conventional only war in Europe possible.


.

They did from around 1979 to the end of the Cold War. The magazines Strategy & Tactics and Modern Warfare detailed that planning in great detail in various post Cold War issues.
 
question is how the slave driven backward Marxist ulus could survive for so long. yes we all know Muscovite the born poodle slaves (product of mongol selection) but 75 years work for free is a bit too much even for them

There are no Marxist ulus... Please say more stupid things.
 
There was no "antichrist".

The Russian Orthodox Church wasn't satanic.

tell to this pop
hqdefault.jpg

and to this Christian man

aLTsDVzpnyyDbJhiVAR9RWdUOuDVKmRo_3UXq4e4liB-b83WOxLiZoukLcHTazHwHCuUOq2kBkWDLMbLsRJXdfCIPGsFoFabC_AwSCrfBpC3e3cP3d1WPQ-ytEPt9K1I8Qir24rds_WyDJ0VDOnqvcv9z4p7owxBMbMyD9YAdQFZAzlPmsuoq137HjWBGMi1UoU


only in nkvd- KGB department format (from 1944)
 
Poor Lithuanian can't admit it was the US and NATO that crumbled the USSR....

i have great admiration to both , + KSA, great Crusader Reagan Vatican and many others . still without Siberian oil ussr´d dead in 70s
 
They did from around 1979 to the end of the Cold War. The magazines Strategy & Tactics and Modern Warfare detailed that planning in great detail in various post Cold War issues.

A wargaming magazine may make for some interesting speculation but it's hardly a solid source when it comes to real life, especially given that every actual warplan we have from the Soviets make clear their intent to utilize nuclear weapons from the get-go.

The Soviets did not share the American belief that a conventional war between the WARPAC and NATO was possible. Their theories of nuclearization of the battlefield all rested on the principle that a nuclear exchange between nuclear powers was inevitable and that there was no tangible distinction between a tactical or strategic exchange. The closest we got was their plans to strike non-Nuclear members of NATO in the hope that the rest (UK, USA, France) would pause before risking total nuclear annihilation.
 
A wargaming magazine may make for some interesting speculation but it's hardly a solid source when it comes to real life, especially given that every actual warplan we have from the Soviets make clear their intent to utilize nuclear weapons from the get-go.

The Soviets did not share the American belief that a conventional war between the WARPAC and NATO was possible. Their theories of nuclearization of the battlefield all rested on the principle that a nuclear exchange between nuclear powers was inevitable and that there was no tangible distinction between a tactical or strategic exchange. The closest we got was their plans to strike non-Nuclear members of NATO in the hope that the rest (UK, USA, France) would pause before risking total nuclear annihilation.

From what I've read the Soviets planned to use nuclear weapons from the beginning because they knew NATO could not stop a conventional attack and would have to resort to nuclear weapons anyway. So the Soviets figured they might as well use them first since they were going to be used anyway.

Later, as NATO conventional strength started growing substantially (late 1970s, to end of the Cold War) the Soviets thought that NATO might actually try to stop them with conventional only weapons which meant that a Soviet nuclear first strike would be unnecessary.
 
i have great admiration to both , + KSA, great Crusader Reagan Vatican and many others . still without Siberian oil ussr´d dead in 70s

You are babbling again.

You have to stop accusing everyone who disagrees with of being stalinist.

And Siberian oil is RUSSIAN oil.
 
From what I've read the Soviets planned to use nuclear weapons from the beginning because they knew NATO could not stop a conventional attack and would have to resort to nuclear weapons anyway. So the Soviets figured they might as well use them first since they were going to be used anyway.

Later, as NATO conventional strength started growing substantially (late 1970s, to end of the Cold War) the Soviets thought that NATO might actually try to stop them with conventional only weapons which meant that a Soviet nuclear first strike would be unnecessary.

That argument makes little sense; if the Soviets thought that they couldn't win with conventional forces alone why would they forgo nuclear weapons? That's why NATO leaned so heavily on nuclear weapons during the early Cold War, to offset that imbalance.

NATO by large recognized that the Soviets maintained conventional superiority and therefore needed nuclear weapons to offset that. NATO (well, the USA specifically) recognized they had a significant advantage in missile technology up until the late 70s, when the Soviet Strategic Rocket Corps began to match the US nuclear missile capability. This in turn led some (again mostly the US) to re-consider the possibility of a limited, conventional only conflict, but everything we know about the Soviets says they didn't share this belief. Every war plan we know (and there was really only two types of Soviet war plans for NATO) of made clear Soviet intentions to utilize nuclear weapons from the start.
 
Pictures without context.

NKVD.and KGB were not the Russian Orthodox Church.

really ? Marxists thugs killing Orthodox priests proves nothing just Pictures without context. ? grandpa you must be drunk
 
i have great admiration to both , + KSA, great Crusader Reagan Vatican and many others . still without Siberian oil ussr´d dead in 70s

The crusaders were psychotic thugs.

Reagan was a blowhard who covered for apartheid South Africa.
 
the Cuban exiles are Crusades who fight Asiatic satanic antichrist Barbaric Muscovites and Marxists . you are as a stalinist support Marxist side of cos
412px-Is_this_tomorrow-371x540.jpg

ooaoyjj.png



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubana_de_Aviación_Flight_455

“ Cubana de Aviación Flight 455 was a Cuban flight from Barbados to Jamaica that was brought down on October 6, 1976 by a terrorist bomb attack. All 73 people on board the Douglas DC-8 aircraft were killed. Two time bombs were used, whose explosives have been variously described as dynamite or C-4.[citation needed] The crash killed every member of the Cuban National Fencing team.
Several CIA-linked anti-Castro Cuban exiles were implicated by the evidence. Political complications quickly arose when Cuba accused the US government of being an accomplice to the attack. CIA documents released in 2005 indicate that the agency "had concrete advance intelligence, as early as June 1976, on plans by Cuban exile terrorist groups to bomb a Cubana airliner."

Former CIA terrorist operative Luis Posada Carriles denies involvement but provides many details of the incident in his book Caminos del Guerrero (Ways of the Warrior).[3][4] The Coordination of United Revolutionary Organizations, of which Carriles was a member, is widely seen as responsible for the bombing.[5][6]“

Orlando Letelier - Wikipedia

“ The FBI described CORU as "an anti-Castro terrorist umbrella organization."[1] According to declassified CIA documents, the Coordination of United Revolutionary Organizations (CORU) was set up at a meeting in the small town of Bonao in the Dominican Republic in June 1976. The meeting was attended by a number of Cuban exile militant groups. The FBI later said that at the meeting, "these groups agreed to jointly participate in the planning, financing, and carrying out of terrorist operations and attacks against Cuba." Bosch, according to the document, was committed to violent acts against other countries he believed supported Cuba, including Colombia, Mexico and Panama. The groups included the terrorist organizations Alpha 66 and Omega 7[1][2] Orlando Bosch, who became leader of CORU, later stated that "Our war strategy was created there—everything. All the top leaders of the paramilitaries in Miami were there."[3]
Carriles and Bosch were both present at the meeting in Bonao, at which CORU was formed, along with Guillermo Novo and Gaspar Jiménez.[2] A number of violent actions followed in the months after this meeting, for some of which CORU directly claimed responsibility.[4] The group used the reputation they had gained from these attacks to generate support for a larger attack, including through a fundraising dinner held in Caracas, at which donors paid $1000 a plate. This larger plot turned out to be the bombing of Cubana Flight 455, which killed 73 people, and which remained the group's largest attack.[2]

CORU continued to carry out violent attacks against the Cuban government until the 1990s.[5] They also participated in attacks against democratic governments elsewhere; CORU members participated in Operation Condor, a covert campaign against left-wing movements, democratic movements, and human-rights campaigns in South America. Other members helped supply the Contras in Nicaragua, and possibly train them as well.[5] Over the 1980s, the US government shifted away from using violent militant activities as its tool against Cuba, and the prominence of CORU declined.[5] Altogether, CORU was responsible for more than 50 bombings, in Miami, New York, Venezuela, Panama, Mexico and Argentina.[6]”

Coordination of United Revolutionary Organizations - Wikipedia

Terrorists. And no amount of Cold War propaganda garbage changes that fact.

And the crusaders were psychotic thugs.
 
really ? Marxists thugs killing Orthodox priests proves nothing just Pictures without context. ? grandpa you must be drunk

RUSSIANS were predominantly RUSSIAN Orthodox.

Nothing "Satanist" or "antichrist" about your average RUSSIAN.

YOU ARE LETTING YOUR RUSSIA HATE RUN WILD.
 
during the bolshevik dictatorship years ?

Ignorant question.

Even after a low point under Kruschev the church remained....

" In 1987 in the Russian SFSR, between 40% and 50% of newborn babies (depending on the region) were baptized. Over 60% of all deceased received Christian funeral services. "

" According to official figures, in 2016 the Church had 174 dioceses, 361 bishops, and 34,764 parishes served by 39,800 clergy. There were 926 monasteries and 30 theological schools."
 
Last edited:
any statistic on times before 1986 , in 1987 Marxism (a form of satanic worshiping ) was already dead in ussr .

ps Russians Are Getting Sick of Church – Foreign Policy

The USSR fell in what year? 26 December 1991 the last time I checked.

And Marxism isn't a "form of satanic worshiping".

That is stupid.

And if there were no Russian Orthodox Church no one would be getting tired of it.
 
Last edited:
The USSR fell in what year? 26 December 1991 the last time I checked.

And Marxism isn't a "form of satanic worshiping".

That is stupid.

And if there were no Russian Orthodox Church no one would be getting tired of it.

1986-91 it was in a coma
 
dont care about nazis, you forget that satanic Maskali could destroy your home-city and kill your family from Cuban bases

watch

Oh yes you do litwin. You very much do.
 
The Secret Soviet Marxist Plan to Crush European civilization in 7 Days. I know the Muscovite Marxist - stalinists were nuts but this plan is some Hitler level crazy.
one forsure this video makes pugabe pans wet , but his ulus rf is not even close to what was ussr



Yeah, they turned it into a game called' "NATO The Next War"..It was an ok game, heavily favored the Soviets...
 
Back
Top Bottom