Any one interested in real debate would not be so scared to answer a question that is about the topic of the thread you are posting in.
I am finding this quite fascinating. Especially when added to comments on the 101 other threads about the same thing that are brought up over and over again.
Challenge them to give their opinion of a terrorist group, and they absolutely refuse to answer. Or scream that it does not matter, as they spin back to something that has nothing to do with the actual topic itself. Or screaming that others are trying to intimidate them.
Honestly I am believing that they may actually support the terrorists, only for the simple reason that President Trump opposes them. They really do not give a damn about Kurds as a group, or the specific group I have been trying to discuss with them for weeks now. That is why they absolutely ignore any attempt to discuss this issue (which is really critical to the topic), or as I have seen in another thread try to defend them - and badly as they apparently do not really know anything about these groups, other than what their own propaganda puts out.
I guess I have an advantage here, having studied what I called the "Alphabet Soup: of the various Palestinian Groups. PLO, PLA, PIJ, PFLP, PFLP-GC, ANO, DFLP, PPSF, ALF, PLF, PAF, and a slew of others. With those groups, it became obvious that what an analyst had to do was to link the connections between groups, not the actual names. And just like with the various Kurdish groups (or the Nationalist and Communists in WWII with Japan), they will often fight each other, then band together against some common enemy, then fall right back to fighting each other again.
And yea, even then you had some with soup for brains that were applauding actions that those groups took. Generally so long as they were attacking Jews or other Palestinians. And this is really no different.
And I actually am interested in actual debate. In a debate, people try to discuss things based on merit and facts. The very proof that nobody is speaking in defense of the PKK shows me that they know they can not back up their support by facts, so they constantly try to derail things into other areas that have nothing to do with the subject. And for some reason I am a "bully" if I try to actually pin them down on if they support the PKK or not.
And one of them even tried that with me once, trying to claim they were not a Marxist-Communist Revolutionary Party, and that they were peaceful people only protecting themselves. Ignoring the fact that they had even assassinated or tried to assassinate other Kurdish leaders who did not share their radical views. They are no more typical of Kurdish views, or supported by most Kurds than the ASLA or JCAG was typical of the beliefs or supported by most Armenians.