Russia trains for large-scale war

beerftw said:

Your ignorance is showing, just to be blunt I never was a corporal or an e-4 in both active duty or reserve, I was e-1 through e-3 more times than most military would ever see rank changes. Now I have held e-6 and e-7 positions been in charge of squads and other leadership positions, but only held the position/authority and never once that kind of rank.

And fyi I was also active duty before the national guard, also never once served in the russian military or ever even been to russia, though I did serve with a russian man in the us army, cool guy but always seemed like he was plotting something, The other thing is you using corporal as an insult, in combat units corporals perform similar duties to sergeants, and are mostly used as team leaders while seargeants are used as squad leaders, meaning in a wartime environment a corporal is a very important part of the combat structure to provide lower level leadership to ensure leadership exists through all levels.

Click to expand...

I never said you weren't at your level.

beerftw said:

You should probably not chug vodka while watching alex jones before you post, I can literally make no sense of what you posted here.

Click to expand...

That's because corporal you're forever at your level.

Corporal is of course a famous rank in history, first half of the 20th century especially which is another reason I use it when I read your stuff. In other words you're having your kampf.

Tangmo said:

I never said you weren't at your level.







That's because corporal you're forever at your level.

Corporal is of course a famous rank in history, first half of the 20th century especially which is another reason I use it when I read your stuff. In other words you're having your kampf.

Click to expand...

Calling someone who wasn't a corporal a corporal? Why does a supposed officer not understand the rank structure?

Tangmo said:

Conservatives / Republicans have finally put country above party.

It's just the wrong country they admire and give their allegiance to.

We see it each day from the Putin-Trump Fanboys.

Click to expand...

Tangmo:

Didn't Ilhan Omar just get into a heap of trouble for saying that same thing publicly? Hmmm.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

Evilroddy said:

Tangmo:

Didn't Ilhan Omar just get into a heap of trouble for saying that same thing publicly? Hmmm.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

Click to expand...

You're groping both religion and the ME which is the center of global human madness and where hope died thousands of years ago. All of 'em and it in the name of the benevolent and loving god.

Russia, USA, Nato, EU are recent in history and involve the modern isims of the Western world post 1850. Specifically, capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism, all of which manifested as clear and coherent ideologies during the second half of the 19th century.

Totalitarianism and dictatorship are nothing new. What's new to history is the democracy that has established itself in the nation state some 250 to 300 years ago. American Conservatives / Republicans going over to Putin's 21st century fascism is that thing in and of itself. Religion is a component of it, not the central core to it.

The central core of the Putin-Trump Fanboys is ideological, cultural and racist, socioeconomic, not religion. Plus an American does not have to be Russian to want the USA to be more like Russia than the other way around. We see this each day. You yourself up there in the frozen north reach high and low a lot in your alleged mind as it is. Your posts attest to the fact. And this one is a stretch much more than it is a reach. You're grabbing air on it in fact and nothing but.

Tangmo said:

I never said you weren't at your level.







That's because corporal you're forever at your level.

Corporal is of course a famous rank in history, first half of the 20th century especially which is another reason I use it when I read your stuff. In other words you're having your kampf.

Click to expand...

No you are using corporal as an insult, your own wording sees to that. Corporals are different things for ever military and even branch, but they are valuable and almost universally the lowest level of nco leadership.

beerftw said:

No you are using corporal as an insult, your own wording sees to that. Corporals are different things for ever military and even branch, but they are valuable and almost universally the lowest level of nco leadership.

Click to expand...

You are misreading my posts. I never said I disrespect corporals or their role and contribution to the US armed forces. Each service member in rank and mos is valuable to the mission and the role of the armed forces.

What I have said....is that I never said you were not at your level. You are exactly at your strategic level, corporal.

So you need to cease your misrepresenting of what I have said about your capacity, capability, rank, status, role, function. I support having corporals of course. And what I have said to you is that you are at your level, exactly. I'm confident you make a fine corporal and I support that. You're not the only corporal in history however. Recent history at that. Because we've seen what can happen when a corporal puts himself in over his head.

Tangmo said:

You are misreading my posts. I never said I disrespect corporals or their role and contribution to the US armed forces. Each service member in rank and mos is valuable to the mission and the role of the armed forces.

What I have said....is that I never said you were not at your level. You are exactly at your strategic level, corporal.

So you need to cease your misrepresenting of what I have said about your capacity, capability, rank, status, role, function. I support having corporals of course. And what I have said to you is that you are at your level, exactly. I'm confident you make a fine corporal and I support that. You're not the only corporal in history however. Recent history at that. Because we've seen what can happen when a corporal puts himself in over his head.

Click to expand...

Why lie? You have disrespected nearly every rank. You have disrespected branches. You have disrespected MOSs.

And your last paragraph is another example of your disrespect.

Tangmo said:

You are misreading my posts. I never said I disrespect corporals or their role and contribution to the US armed forces. Each service member in rank and mos is valuable to the mission and the role of the armed forces.

What I have said....is that I never said you were not at your level. You are exactly at your strategic level, corporal.

So you need to cease your misrepresenting of what I have said about your capacity, capability, rank, status, role, function. I support having corporals of course. And what I have said to you is that you are at your level, exactly. I'm confident you make a fine corporal and I support that. You're not the only corporal in history however. Recent history at that. Because we've seen what can happen when a corporal puts himself in over his head.

Click to expand...

The mere fact you keep calling me corporal knowing I have never held that ranks tells me you use corporal as an insult, could not just call me private as was my earned rank as a trouble maker always sitting infront of the sergeant major.