• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Afghan government rejects proposals to privatize war

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,280
Reaction score
82,624
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Afghan government rejects proposals to privatize war

Ashraf-Ghani.jpg

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani speaks during a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan.

10/5/18
KABUL (Reuters) - Afghan officials have reacted angrily to speculation that foreign military contractors could take over training and advising the Afghan armed forces, following a renewed push by the founder of private military contractor Blackwater. Erik Prince, whose company came to prominence during the war in Iraq, has been lobbying officials about his proposal to privatize parts of U.S. military operations in Afghanistan for more than a year. On a recent visit to Kabul, he lobbied several Afghan political figures and gave interviews to media outlets including Tolo News, Afghanistan’s largest television station, as well as the New York Times, to discuss the plan. President Ashraf Ghani, approaching presidential elections in April, has repeatedly rejected the proposal and on Thursday his national security adviser issued a statement condemning what he called a “destructive and divisive debate”. “Under no circumstances will the Afghan government and people allow the counterterrorism fight to become a private, for-profit business,” the statement said.

In August, U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis also rebuffed the idea, saying: “When Americans put their nation’s credibility on the line, privatizing it is probably not a wise idea.” Afghan officials say that any move to replace U.S military advisers with private contractors would further undermine government legitimacy and fuel Taliban accusations that the war was being conducted for the benefit of foreign interests. Speaking half seriously, one senior security official said recently: “If they did that, even I would join the Taliban”. The plan was originally broached last year as Trump was considering a new strategy for Afghanistan but it was not adopted and instead, Washington ordered thousands more U.S. troops to be sent to boost existing forces. The United States currently has some 14,000 troops in Afghanistan, serving in the NATO-led Resolute Support training and advisory mission as well as in separate counter-terrorism operations against militant groups like Islamic State. Trump has since been reported to be unhappy about the lack of progress, prompting fears among some diplomats that he could reverse course and order U.S. troops out of Afghanistan, a move that would risk a collapse of the Western-backed government.

We've been entangled in Afghanistan for 17 years now. We can't stay there forever, but we can't just depart and foster a power-vacuum there either.

If the Taliban do take over, it's only a matter of time until violent Islamist groups such as IS utilize Afghanistan's rough topography to establish caliphate regions.

Related: Erik Prince, in Kabul, pushes privatization of the Afghan war
 
The US military has been in Afghanistan 70% longer than the Russians...........
 
My boy is over there now, it makes me sick.

America has really let me down.
 
The US military has been in Afghanistan 70% longer than the Russians...........

Yes but the russians only left there because the soviet union collapsed, had they stayed together and not had economic and political issues they may have had troops there to this day with no progress.
 
you should do better
















at the ballot box

Our foreign policy has been largely incompetent for decades, because the entire Ruling Class has been rotten for decades, which is why I joined the Rebellion on 9.10.15
 
Our foreign policy has been largely incompetent for decades, because the entire Ruling Class has been rotten for decades, which is why I joined the Rebellion on 9.10.15

and now your child is serving in afghanistan
how is that rebellion working out for you ... and him
 
and now your child is serving in afghanistan
how is that rebellion working out for you ... and him

Trump never should have gone along with Deep State here, he did not want to but he 1) did not trust his knowledge base enough to defy Deep State and 2) he was working to build up capital to use on stuff that he was more sure about....Trump is shrewd like that, this is why he has so much success in life, he has been successful generally his whole life, this being one of the best politicians of his generation was just a wild hair very late into life thing...

I blame Deep State, I blame the FAILED INTELLIGENTSIA!
 
Trump never should have gone along with Deep State here, he did not want to but he 1) did not trust his knowledge base enough to defy Deep State and 2) he was working to build up capital to use on stuff that he was more sure about....Trump is shrewd like that, this is why he has so much success in life, he has been successful generally his whole life, this being one of the best politicians of his generation was just a wild hair very late into life thing...

I blame Deep State, I blame the FAILED INTELLIGENTSIA!

So in other words you can't handle the fact your "rebellion" was totally meaningless and therefore you are blaming something that doesn't exist.
 
We've been entangled in Afghanistan for 17 years now. We can't stay there forever, but we can't just depart and foster a power-vacuum there either.

If the Taliban do take over, it's only a matter of time until violent Islamist groups such as IS utilize Afghanistan's rough topography to establish caliphate regions.

More like if the Taliban take over again. I for one remember what it was like the last time they were in charge.

As far as staying there forever, why not? We have been in Korea, Japan, and Germany since long before I was born. We have been in the former Yugoslavia since Bush Sr. was in office.

I would rather stay there for another 40 years, then see a return to what Afghanistan was 20 years ago.

I for one have always rejected the idea of an "exit strategy". As far as I am concerned, you stay until the country is stable and no longer needs outside assistance. Period. Otherwise, it is like going through a ghetto in a drug and crime sweep, then just pulling out, along with all police presence and hoping that the gangs and drugs will go away and the crime will then stop.
 
Afghan government rejects proposals to privatize war

Ashraf-Ghani.jpg

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani speaks during a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan.



We've been entangled in Afghanistan for 17 years now. We can't stay there forever, but we can't just depart and foster a power-vacuum there either.

If the Taliban do take over, it's only a matter of time until violent Islamist groups such as IS utilize Afghanistan's rough topography to establish caliphate regions.

Related: Erik Prince, in Kabul, pushes privatization of the Afghan war

It might be time to establish nuclear test sites for missile targeting.

just sayin'...
 
As far as staying there forever, why not? We have been in Korea, Japan, and Germany since long before I was born.

As far as I know, we're not getting shot at in those places.
 
Back
Top Bottom