• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ban on chemical and germ warfare is sexist

RobertU

RobertU

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
631
Location
Vacaville, CA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Opposition to chemical and biological weapons is sexist. We readily accept weapons that have “male” characteristics: weapons like bombs and bullets that explode like a male orgasm or penetrate the body in phallic projectiles.

Poison is the traditional weapon of the female. Yet we abhor “female” chemical and biological weapons that kill or injure through poisoning.

We need to end this double standard and remove the glass ceiling on female weaponry. Indeed, I would recommend taking affirmative action to end this discrimination. We should reserve at least half our arsenal for chemical and biological weapons. Anything less would be a grave social injustice.
 
RobertU said:
Opposition to chemical and biological weapons is sexist. We readily accept weapons that have “male” characteristics: weapons like bombs and bullets that explode like a male orgasm or penetrate the body in phallic projectiles.

Poison is the traditional weapon of the female. Yet we abhor “female” chemical and biological weapons that kill or injure through poisoning.

We need to end this double standard and remove the glass ceiling on female weaponry. Indeed, I would recommend taking affirmative action to end this discrimination. We should reserve at least half our arsenal for chemical and biological weapons. Anything less would be a grave social injustice.
Click to expand...

What on Earth are you talking about, you silly person?

It is clear that the reason these weapons are banned is because they are too effective and make wars less costly, thus negating the need for more expensive weaponry and equipment and thereby depriving the military industrial complex of valuable revenue. That is why the ban on them should be lifted. Let us undercut the too-big-to-fail corporate military manufacturing giants by letting the up-and-coming chemical weapons and biological weapons firms into the market! Let competition in the marketplace of death thrive! :rofl
 
Last edited:
RobertU said:
Opposition to chemical and biological weapons is sexist. We readily accept weapons that have “male” characteristics: weapons like bombs and bullets that explode like a male orgasm or penetrate the body in phallic projectiles.

Poison is the traditional weapon of the female. Yet we abhor “female” chemical and biological weapons that kill or injure through poisoning.

We need to end this double standard and remove the glass ceiling on female weaponry. Indeed, I would recommend taking affirmative action to end this discrimination. We should reserve at least half our arsenal for chemical and biological weapons. Anything less would be a grave social injustice.
Click to expand...

You ever really look at your hands, man? I mean, REALLY look?
 
RobertU said:
Opposition to chemical and biological weapons is sexist. We readily accept weapons that have “male” characteristics: weapons like bombs and bullets that explode like a male orgasm or penetrate the body in phallic projectiles.

Poison is the traditional weapon of the female. Yet we abhor “female” chemical and biological weapons that kill or injure through poisoning.

We need to end this double standard and remove the glass ceiling on female weaponry. Indeed, I would recommend taking affirmative action to end this discrimination. We should reserve at least half our arsenal for chemical and biological weapons. Anything less would be a grave social injustice.
Click to expand...

Lol, this reminds me of that gender studies paper that actually got into a peer reviewed journal claiming penises cause climate change.
 
RobertU said:
Opposition to chemical and biological weapons is sexist. We readily accept weapons that have “male” characteristics: weapons like bombs and bullets that explode like a male orgasm or penetrate the body in phallic projectiles.

Poison is the traditional weapon of the female. Yet we abhor “female” chemical and biological weapons that kill or injure through poisoning.

We need to end this double standard and remove the glass ceiling on female weaponry. Indeed, I would recommend taking affirmative action to end this discrimination. We should reserve at least half our arsenal for chemical and biological weapons. Anything less would be a grave social injustice.
Click to expand...

:inandout:
 
Kobie said:
You ever really look at your hands, man? I mean, REALLY look?
Click to expand...

I don't know why they call them fingers you never see them fing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom