• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Female Ranger School student dropped for pregnancy

If was an SF soldier (an actual SF soldier) I wouldn't be on the internet bragging about it. That's a serious breach in intel security. That's just me, though...thinking like a real soldier.

Says the person who knows zero about this topic.
Guess what clown there are several entire forums where the vast majority of people on there are SOF guys. There is nothing wrong with saying that I am SF. It is not something we have to keep secret. Same goes for SEALs and Rangers. We wear a Tab that tells everyone who sees us in uniform that we are SF.
I think you watch to much TV. It is apparently where you get all your knowledge about the military since you seem to have no actual knowledge. That's why you have been wrong on pretty much every claim you have made in this thread. Things that an actual Soldier would know. Says quite a bit about you.
 
Says the person who knows zero about this topic.
Guess what clown there are several entire forums where the vast majority of people on there are SOF guys. There is nothing wrong with saying that I am SF. It is not something we have to keep secret. Same goes for SEALs and Rangers. We wear a Tab that tells everyone who sees us in uniform that we are SF.
I think you watch to much TV. It is apparently where you get all your knowledge about the military since you seem to have no actual knowledge. That's why you have been wrong on pretty much every claim you have made in this thread. Things that an actual Soldier would know. Says quite a bit about you.

I guess my first clue was when you lost your **** because I said the M-16 is a ****ty battle rifle and that it's no match for the FAL, or the G3. Anyone with any real field experience would concur with that assessment.
 
If was an SF soldier (an actual SF soldier) I wouldn't be on the internet bragging about it. That's a serious breach in intel security. That's just me, though...thinking like a real soldier.

Lol ****ing what? being in SOF isn't classified information, what on Earth lead you to believe that? They have long tabs, special berets, and their own crest for a reason. They're another branch within the Army just like the others, complete with crests, and an insignia.
 
Lol ****ing what? being in SOF isn't classified information, what on Earth lead you to believe that? They have long tabs, special berets, and their own crest for a reason. They're another branch within the Army just like the others, complete with crests, and an insignia.

Never said it was. You dudes need to address what I said vice what I didn't.
 
Never said it was. You dudes need to address what I said vice what I didn't.

What you said was bragging about being in SF on the internet is a breach of Operational Security. Commenting on your MOS isn't a breach of security. I am in Military Intelligence MOS; A 35 series job field, and a job that requires a higher clearance than any 18 series MOS. Yet I'm more than allowed to go on social media and post a picture of myself in uniform with the MI insignia.
 
What you said was bragging about being in SF on the internet is a breach of Operational Security. Commenting on your MOS isn't a breach of security. I am in Military Intelligence MOS; A 35 series job field, and a job that requires a higher clearance than any 18 series MOS. Yet I'm more than allowed to go on social media and post a picture of myself in uniform with the MI insignia.

See? There you go again. I said intel security.

If you were operational, would you be announcing when you are and aren't in the field by posting on an unsecured internet forum? That's a little piece of the puzzle that be used to create a bigger picture.

So far, it's been announced he's with the 10th SFG, he's in Okinawa and by his posts, we know when he is and isn't in the field. We also know that he carries an SBR and his host unit has an organic mortar team. Aren't you MI?

Even grunts were taught SALUTE reports.

If you advertised on social media that you're MI, that would be dumb as ****.
 
I guess my first clue was when you lost your **** because I said the M-16 is a ****ty battle rifle and that it's no match for the FAL, or the G3. Anyone with any real field experience would concur with that assessment.

OH look it's APDST trying to change the topic because he has been proven wrong over and over and over again. Unfortunately it's another topic he had no real world knowledge on.

You think he would learn his lesson.

So APDST which TV show did you learn about how great the G3 and the FAL are.
 
Lol ****ing what? being in SOF isn't classified information, what on Earth lead you to believe that? They have long tabs, special berets, and their own crest for a reason. They're another branch within the Army just like the others, complete with crests, and an insignia.

He is a clown that knows virtually nothing about the military. Why would you expect different.
 
OH look it's APDST trying to change the topic because he has been proven wrong over and over and over again. Unfortunately it's another topic he had no real world knowledge on.

You think he would learn his lesson.

So APDST which TV show did you learn about how great the G3 and the FAL are.

See..?
 
See? There you go again. I said intel security.

If you were operational, would you be announcing when you are and aren't in the field by posting on an unsecured internet forum? That's a little piece of the puzzle that be used to create a bigger picture.

So far, it's been announced he's with the 10th SFG, he's in Okinawa and by his posts, we know when he is and isn't in the field. We also know that he carries an SBR and his host unit has an organic mortar team. Aren't you MI?

Even grunts were taught SALUTE reports.

If you advertised on social media that you're MI, that would be dumb as ****.
Poor poor APDST. So clueless.
You do not realize that you can post on this forum from Afghanistan just as easily as you can from the cat majority of ranges and training areas on most military bases.

Stating what group I am in is not secret information. You can tell what group just by looking at my beret. And it's 1st not 10th. It's not any secret what so ever that 1st Group has a BN in okie. Hell it's on the USASOC website.
And let's see you quote me saying that there is an organic mortar team with my unit. bet you can't. You pulling crap out of your butt again I see
. The fact that SF has short barreled rifles is no secret. USASOC releases plenty of pictures with those weapons in use.

Nothing I have posted is not already open source information.
So care to try again.

This is the problem with people who have no idea what they are talking about but like to pretend they do. It leads them to making all sorry of dumb statements that are ridiculous to anyone with a clue.
 
Poor poor APDST. So clueless.
You do not realize that you can post on this forum from Afghanistan just as easily as you can from the cat majority of ranges and training areas on most military bases.

Stating what group I am in is not secret information. You can tell what group just by looking at my beret. And it's 1st not 10th. It's not any secret what so ever that 1st Group has a BN in okie. Hell it's on the USASOC website.
And let's see you quote me saying that there is an organic mortar team with my unit. bet you can't. You pulling crap out of your butt again I see
. The fact that SF has short barreled rifles is no secret. USASOC releases plenty of pictures with those weapons in use.

Nothing I have posted is not already open source information.
So care to try again.

This is the problem with people who have no idea what they are talking about but like to pretend they do. It leads them to making all sorry of dumb statements that are ridiculous to anyone with a clue.

That was too easy.
 

Yep I see you talking about things you are clueless on. Maybe if you had ever actually served in the military you would know better.

So how about you tell us more about what being recycled means. Or back up your claim that female soldier in the linked story was trying to go to the 75th Ranger Regiment. Or how people in the 75th are not Rangers till they go to Ranger School.
 
That was too easy.

Yes it was very easy proving just how little you know about the military. That's what happens when all your knowledge comes from watching TV shows.
 
See? There you go again. I said intel security.

Oh please tell me all about the difference between intel security and classified information. This should be good.

If you were operational, would you be announcing when you are and aren't in the field by posting on an unsecured internet forum?

Operational as in operating in a certain theater? No, that would be breach of operational security. That's privileged information.

That's a little piece of the puzzle that be used to create a bigger picture.

Sure, but telling people your MOS, even if it's 18B or 18S doesn't cause harm to operational security. It isn't a secret that 2nd bat is stationed in JBLM, and most SOF groups are stationed in Bragg.

So far, it's been announced he's with the 10th SFG, he's in Okinawa and by his posts, we know when he is and isn't in the field.

10th Group is usually stationed in Carson, BD could be on temporary assignment doing SF recruiting detail. He could be doing anything when he's not posting on a politics site. Hell, do you know if I'm at work right now or not? Does that have any bearing on security?

We also know that he carries an SBR and his host unit has an organic mortar team.

And that's all unclassified information and not classified. Despite popular belief, not everything in the Army gets a "Secret" red sticker slapped on it.

Aren't you MI?

Yes, and I handle classified information daily. Which is why I can speak on this matter with some levity than assuming that a user posting that he is SF is endangering himself or others.

Even grunts were taught SALUTE reports.[/quote]



If you advertised on social media that you're MI, that would be dumb as ****.

Dumb yes, it's certainly cringe worthy but it's not uncommon. Even if I didn't outwardly mention I was in MI even most laymen (like yourself) could assess I'm in intelligence because my unit is a Military Intelligence Company within a MI Brigade.
 
Oh please tell me all about the difference between intel security and classified information. This should be good.



Operational as in operating in a certain theater? No, that would be breach of operational security. That's privileged information.



Sure, but telling people your MOS, even if it's 18B or 18S doesn't cause harm to operational security. It isn't a secret that 2nd bat is stationed in JBLM, and most SOF groups are stationed in Bragg.



10th Group is usually stationed in Carson, BD could be on temporary assignment doing SF recruiting detail. He could be doing anything when he's not posting on a politics site. Hell, do you know if I'm at work right now or not? Does that have any bearing on security?



And that's all unclassified information and not classified. Despite popular belief, not everything in the Army gets a "Secret" red sticker slapped on it.



Yes, and I handle classified information daily. Which is why I can speak on this matter with some levity than assuming that a user posting that he is SF is endangering himself or others.






Dumb yes, it's certainly cringe worthy but it's not uncommon. Even if I didn't outwardly mention I was in MI even most laymen (like yourself) could assess I'm in intelligence because my unit is a Military Intelligence Company within a MI Brigade.



Just add two things. One there is no such thing as an 18S. Second I am in 1st Group. As usual APDST can't get anything right.

Other then that you are spot on.
It really just comes down to the fact that he got caught acting like he knew stuff when it is obvious he doesn't and is now just clutching at straws. It's all he has left.
 
Just add two things. One there is no such thing as an 18S. Second I am in 1st Group. As usual APDST can't get anything right.

Other then that you are spot on.
It really just comes down to the fact that he got caught acting like he knew stuff when it is obvious he doesn't and is now just clutching at straws. It's all he has left.

I fat fingered "S" for a "D" thinking D was the Intel Sergeant, but after googling it's Medical. Thank you for the correction regardless.
 
I fat fingered "S" for a "D" thinking D was the Intel Sergeant, but after googling it's Medical. Thank you for the correction regardless.

No worries. Was debating even saying anything it really doesn't matter.
Have a good one.
 
So, you DO want women to be held to a lower standard. Got it.

I dont know what the standard is...maybe women already achieve it. But *as I wrote* most roles in the military do not require exceptional strength.
 
Wrong.

The military does NOT "serve society". The military serves the Constitution and the superiors in the Chain of Command. That Chain of Command resides solely within the Executive Branch.

Your/society's input is limited to influencing the Commander in Chief (the President) and influencing the various Congressional oversight committees that affect the Department of Defense. Soldiers owe you NO consideration whatsoever.

Now...if a soldier or veteran dismisses your nonsense because you've never served, you should take that as an indication that you should educate yourself on their point of view.


Your authority and competence in the matter is lacking and it is lacking severely. The military has two oaths of service -- the enlisted and the officer. You are reciting the contents of EP oath. You recite it exclusively and within its proscribed limitations. Only.

It is appropriate to remind you that you obey the superior officers appointed over you. The officer oath is -- in contrast -- to the Constitution only. Potus/CinC is not in the officer oath. No one is. No other officer is in fact in the officer oath. No officer civilian or military. This is the expressed advocacy by Geo Washington adopted by Washington and his fellow Founders who wrote the Constitution and by the first Congress that wrote the military oath. The officer oath, being to the Constitution solely and exclusively, is to the three branches of the government, the coequal branches of the government, the checks and balances -- and to the leader of each branch. Potus/CinC is one of 'em. Potus is appointed CinC by the Constitution as an administrative and executive position. In other words, if a general or admiral wanted the opinion of the chief justice of Scotus he could get one. Or of another justice or several of 'em. A flag officer can confer with the Speaker to also possibly include the so-called Gang of Eight leaders of the parties in the House and the Senate. There is the SecDef also who is principal military adviser to Potus/CinC in presenting the views of the Pentagon. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and the chairman all of whom are the principal uniformed advisers to Potus/CinC. JCS are not in the chain of command which throws your statements in respect of the chain of command to the winds.

So the summary of the post is that he who bellows authority and authoritatively bellows. A mitigating factor to the vacuous statements in the post is that EP are poorly instructed or informed of the officer oath, its nature, its origin, the evolution of it and its rationale and purpose -- and the fundamental difference between the EP oath and the officer oath. The officer oath is to the Constitution only for the reasons and purposes specified by Washington himself, i.e., to check a tyrant leader should one emerge, and should a tyrant take power and abuse it and misuse it.
 
A record 16 out of 100 Navy women are reassigned from ships to shore duty due to pregnancy, according to data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

That number is up 2 percent from 2015, representing hundreds more who have to cut their deployments short, taxing both their unit’s manpower, military budgets and combat readiness. Further, such increases cast a shadow over the lofty gender integration goals set by former President Barack Obama.

Overall, women unexpectedly leave their stations on Navy ships as much as 50 percent more frequently to return to land duty, according to documents obtained from the Navy. The statistics were compiled by the Navy Personnel Command at the request of TheDCNF, covering the period from January 2015 to September 2016.

The evacuation of pregnant women is costly for the Navy. Jude Eden, a nationally known author about women in the military who served in 2004 as a Marine deployed to Iraq, said a single transfer can cost the Navy up to $30,000 for each woman trained for a specific task, then evacuated from an active duty ship and sent to land. That figure translates into $115 million in expenses for 2016 alone.

“This is an avoidable cost and expense, leaving a gap for other people to pick up the work slack,” Eden said.

https://stream.org/deployed-us-navy-pregnancy-problem-getting-worse/

so do you think that women are having more sex than men?

I'm speculating that unmarried women in the service are having less sex than unmarried men. Do you think that it's wrong for unmarried men and women to have sex when enlisted?

OTOH, even if they have sex fewer times OR as much as men, women are still the only ones that get pregnant, and no birth control is 100%.

Would you hold women to a higher standard for consensual sex while enlisted than men?
 
She got pregnant proving that women can not and should not be Rangers...


Letting their kids do it is fine. To be encouraged in fact if the kid might be interested in the military for any period of time, reason or purpose. The long and the short of it might be that we could be having a bit too much experimentation in Rangers qualifications but eligibility especially. Jus sayin.
 
Your authority and competence in the matter is lacking and it is lacking severely. The military has two oaths of service -- the enlisted and the officer. You are reciting the contents of EP oath. You recite it exclusively and within its proscribed limitations. Only.

It is appropriate to remind you that you obey the superior officers appointed over you. The officer oath is -- in contrast -- to the Constitution only. Potus/CinC is not in the officer oath. No one is. No other officer is in fact in the officer oath. No officer civilian or military. This is the expressed advocacy by Geo Washington adopted by Washington and his fellow Founders who wrote the Constitution and by the first Congress that wrote the military oath. The officer oath, being to the Constitution solely and exclusively, is to the three branches of the government, the coequal branches of the government, the checks and balances -- and to the leader of each branch. Potus/CinC is one of 'em. Potus is appointed CinC by the Constitution as an administrative and executive position. In other words, if a general or admiral wanted the opinion of the chief justice of Scotus he could get one. Or of another justice or several of 'em. A flag officer can confer with the Speaker to also possibly include the so-called Gang of Eight leaders of the parties in the House and the Senate. There is the SecDef also who is principal military adviser to Potus/CinC in presenting the views of the Pentagon. The Joint Chiefs of Staff and the chairman all of whom are the principal uniformed advisers to Potus/CinC. JCS are not in the chain of command which throws your statements in respect of the chain of command to the winds.

So the summary of the post is that he who bellows authority and authoritatively bellows. A mitigating factor to the vacuous statements in the post is that EP are poorly instructed or informed of the officer oath, its nature, its origin, the evolution of it and its rationale and purpose -- and the fundamental difference between the EP oath and the officer oath. The officer oath is to the Constitution only for the reasons and purposes specified by Washington himself, i.e., to check a tyrant leader should one emerge, and should a tyrant take power and abuse it and misuse it.

Poor Tangmo... Did some "EP" beat you up for lunch money?
 
She should have disciplined enough to avoid getting pregnant. She's trying to become a member of one of the most elite infantry regiments in the world. She needs to act like it.

So it's her fault then?. OMG! :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom