• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S.-Led Liberation of Raqqa Killed Hundreds of Civilians: Watchdog

Yep , I thought you actually might be able to , for once, hold up your end of a debate without having to constantly deploy ad hominems , straw men and also ignore reality, I was wrong. I should have known better from the past experiences of interaction with yourself that trying such unattainable goals would be a waste of time.

I feel really stupid now :roll:

You should...

Mr. Conflation.
 
the mantra of war mongers is basically, "you gotta kill a lot to free a lot more"

that's war 4 U ...........
 
And at the same time interestingly enough, the US also supported Iran.

And prior to 1990, the US took military action against both Iraq and Iran.

Oh, as did a great many other countries. But you seem to save all of your anger for the US only. Strange, one might suppose that you are unhinged in this regard, and have some kind of agenda.

Sorry, no interest in your personal opinions. Especially as you have this habit of only giving half-truths and ignoring a great many other things.

As I have said earlier , when it comes to rogue state/state terrorism the US is in something in a league of its own. The cases of Saddam Hussein/Iraq and Iran are only two examples worthy of some study in this regard

I don't recall me using any " half truths " but I do recall you spouting a number of outright fictional BS claims at the start of this thread that merited the response I gave. I think that's where you first felt the pole up your a**e that resulted in the hostility towards me. That's fine and expected but also worthy of a mention here again
 
*shakes head slowly*

Wow, really?

You are really trying to use this. A political satire, made by 2 conservatives that spends the entire movie essentially laughing at Liberals and their absurd beliefs and concepts of the world.

That is the funniest thing about that movie really. It was made over the top, so that Liberals could point at it and say "See! Even they get it, this has to stop!"

Meanwhile Parker & Stone made a movie that essentially lambasted Liberals, and they love it. They do not even seem to realize that they are the butt of the entire joke.

I loses something when you have to explain it to them....
 
the mantra of war mongers is basically, "you gotta kill a lot to free a lot more"

that's war 4 U ...........

And even that ain't the truth. imo

The people that pump that sh*te out are reading from a script too. The alleged wish for/promotion of freedom of a people is good PR but the real driver is geopolitical gain every time. Some people just never want to acknowledge that fact as is completely evident again in this thread
 
And at the same time interestingly enough, the US also supported Iran.

And prior to 1990, the US took military action against both Iraq and Iran.

Oh, as did a great many other countries. But you seem to save all of your anger for the US only. Strange, one might suppose that you are unhinged in this regard, and have some kind of agenda.

Sorry, no interest in your personal opinions. Especially as you have this habit of only giving half-truths and ignoring a great many other things.

I'm up for the debate on US involvement in the histories of Iran and Iraq , seeing as you are coming on all expert like and accusing me of telling half truths whilst being seemingly forgetful that it is I that have exposed your falsehoods and ignorance on a number of issues thus far in this thread.
 
I'm up for the debate on US involvement in the histories of Iran and Iraq , seeing as you are coming on all expert like and accusing me of telling half truths whilst being seemingly forgetful that it is I that have exposed your falsehoods and ignorance on a number of issues thus far in this thread.

Dunning, meet Kruger... Kruger, Dunning.
 
And everyone else has you tagged for what you are. Lol.

And, of course , you speak for everyone else. You can't even speak for yourself properly
 
Dunning, meet Kruger... Kruger, Dunning.

When the bar's set so low................... lol

Thing is I can back my statements and can back the ones I've made here
 
I'm up for the debate on US involvement in the histories of Iran and Iraq , seeing as you are coming on all expert like and accusing me of telling half truths whilst being seemingly forgetful that it is I that have exposed your falsehoods and ignorance on a number of issues thus far in this thread.

A Hezbollah fan crying about civilian casualties is absolutely absurd, by the way. Your heroes try to maximize civilian casualties, yet you spend all your time inventing fairy tales about "US meddling" and other such crap.
 
A Hezbollah fan crying about civilian casualties is absolutely absurd, by the way. Your heroes try to maximize civilian casualties, yet you spend all your time inventing fairy tales about "US meddling" and other such crap.

Just when you think it can't be any worse a supporter of paedophilia/paedophiles decides to jump in and spout more junk , lol.

As if there haven't been enough Americans here defending their rogue state terrorism. You live in denial because you haven't the independence of thought needed to try to see through the BS your own propaganda system forces down your throat as a forced and fake reality
 
Just when you think it can't be any worse a supporter of paedophilia/paedophiles decides to jump in and spout more junk , lol.

As if there haven't been enough Americans here defending their rogue state terrorism. You live in denial because you haven't the independence of thought needed to try to see through the BS your own propaganda system forces down your throat as a forced and fake reality

Post numbers where he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles ?
 
Post numbers where he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles ?

He went out of his way to defend those sexually abusing young boys in Afghanistan purely because they are the ones the US are working with there. He chose to ignore the words of US soldiers that had been disciplined for complaining about it or actually fighting with those responsible. He ignored the words of Afghans themselves and the western journalists and UN staffers that interviewed them. Not once did he actually allow himself to criticize the paedophiles, such is his adherence to the mantra

you can follow it here

https://www.debatepolitics.com/mili...hanistan-5-billion-failure-watchdog-says.html

You will side with him no doubt because you are a cheek off the same arse. Contented mushrooms, happy to be fed on sh*t and kept in the dark
 
He went out of his way to defend those sexually abusing young boys in Afghanistan purely because they are the ones the US are working with there. He chose to ignore the words of US soldiers that had been disciplined for complaining about it or actually fighting with those responsible. He ignored the words of Afghans themselves and the western journalists and UN staffers that interviewed them. Not once did he actually allow himself to criticize the paedophiles, such is his adherence to the mantra

you can follow it here

https://www.debatepolitics.com/mili...hanistan-5-billion-failure-watchdog-says.html

You will side with him no doubt because you are a cheek off the same arse. Contented mushrooms, happy to be fed on sh*t and kept in the dark

Post numbers where he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles ?

SUPPORTED

As in SUPPORTED

Not that he doesn't like a group known for their misogyny, hatred of religions other than their brand of Islam, their support of terrorists, etc.

Where has he stated, inferred or implied he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles?

Post number?

Support or retract.
 
Just when you think it can't be any worse a supporter of paedophilia/paedophiles decides to jump in and spout more junk , lol.

As if there haven't been enough Americans here defending their rogue state terrorism. You live in denial because you haven't the independence of thought needed to try to see through the BS your own propaganda system forces down your throat as a forced and fake reality

Oh look, the Hezbollah fanboy is busy spotting yet more bull**** because he has fantasies about the Taliban. Typical.

Ah yes, the Hezbollah fanboy is busily shrieking his lies about US "terrorism" which is a load of crap.

A Hezbollah fanboy like you has no room to talk with your deluded ravings about how supporting actual terrorists makes you "independent minded".

As usual, anti americans prove to support atrocities far worse than anything they fantasize the US did.
 
Post numbers where he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles ?

SUPPORTED

As in SUPPORTED

Not that he doesn't like a group known for their misogyny, hatred of religions other than their brand of Islam, their support of terrorists, etc.

Where has he stated, inferred or implied he SUPPORTED paedophilia/paedophiles?

Post number?

Support or retract.

The Hezbollah fanboy is upset because I don't agree with his delusion that the current US backed Afghan government is as bad as the Taliban.
 
Back
Top Bottom