• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Assad raises prospect of clashes with U.S. forces in Syria

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,343
Reaction score
82,725
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Assad raises prospect of clashes with U.S. forces in Syria

42fa597fd4d9d888fefd5ecfcfa12d6b--arab-news-news-agency.jpg


Reuters
5/31/18

In an interview with Russia’s RT international broadcaster, Assad said he would negotiate with fighters backed on the ground by Washington, but would reclaim territory they control by force if necessary, whether or not American troops supported them. Assad also responded sharply to U.S. President Donald Trump’s description of him as an animal, saying “what you say is what you are”. Assad, who is backed by Russia and Iran, appears militarily unassailable in the war that has killed an estimated half a million people, uprooted around 6 million people in the country, and driven another 5 million abroad as refugees. Around 2,000 U.S. special forces troops are believed to be on the ground in Syria, where they have aided a group called the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which is led by the YPG, a Kurdish militia. The U.S.-backed group holds the largest area of Syrian territory outside government control, but has tried to avoid direct clashes with the government during the multi-sided war.

Assad said the government had “started now opening doors for negotiations” with the SDF. “This is the first option. If not, we’re going to resort to ... liberating those areas by force. We don’t have any other options, with the Americans or without the Americans,” he said in a text of the interview published by Syria’s state news agency. Kino Gabriel, a spokesman for the SDF, said in response to Assad’s comments that a military solution “is not a solution that can lead to any result”, and would “lead to more losses and destruction and difficulties for the Syrian people”. The SDF wants a “democratic system based on diversity, equality, freedom and justice” for all the country’s ethnic and religious groups, he added in a voice message to Reuters.

Assad is posturing. That said, I hope Trump doesn't abandon the YPG/YPJ to appease Erdogan who wishes to cleanse the northern region of Syria (Rojava) of Kurds and replace them with Sunnis and Turkmen.
 
Assad raises prospect of clashes with U.S. forces in Syria

42fa597fd4d9d888fefd5ecfcfa12d6b--arab-news-news-agency.jpg




Assad is posturing. That said, I hope Trump doesn't abandon the YPG/YPJ to appease Erdogan who wishes to cleanse the northern region of Syria (Rojava) of Kurds and replace them with Sunnis and Turkmen.

Assad is making the point that USA forces are "INVADERS" in Syria. A disruptive threat to Syrian sovereignty. There are 2,000 US military and perhaps another 3-6,000 PMCs. Mercenaries/private military contractors on the US payroll and not including any Kurdish military forces funded, armed and trained by the USA. The Kurds are an unusual problem, but a Syrian/Turkey problem. The USA has no business being involved. The USA, SDF, PMCs, and Kurds are all terrorists. To consider USA as "good guys" in the Syrian embroglio is a fantasy narrative promoted by the MSM NeoCon agenda. Assad is not posturing. He is serving notice that his armies have cleaned up most of the ISIS terrorists and must now deal with enforcing their sovereignty in the region of Syria "occupied" by the "invaders/terrorists," the USA.
/
 
My reading of Assad's comments lead me to think that he said that while there had been some close calls of clashes between US and Russian forces, he felt that they had mostly been averted, thanks to responsible Russian leadership. By avoiding confrontation, Putin helped avert major clashes.
 
My advice to Assad is shut your pie hole you could very easily become a burnt ember after the US military completes a mission against you! :peace

maxresdefault.jpg
 
al-Assad is just trying to do what Russia does with pushing limits, odds are he is not ready for direct clashes in that context.
 
My advice to Assad is shut your pie hole you could very easily become a burnt ember after the US military completes a mission against you! :peace

Why should he " shut his pie hole " ?

The horrific war in Syria might hopefully be nearing its end and it is perfectly reasonable to see the government there wanting to see an end to all the foreign proxies bent of carrying things on or holding the territory of the state

You would never accept Syrian proxies fighting on US territory should the roles be reversed
 
Why should he " shut his pie hole " ?

The horrific war in Syria might hopefully be nearing its end and it is perfectly reasonable to see the government there wanting to see an end to all the foreign proxies bent of carrying things on or holding the territory of the state

You would never accept Syrian proxies fighting on US territory should the roles be reversed

Remind me who used WMD on his own people? Remember the RED line stuff?
 
Remind me who used WMD on his own people? Remember the RED line stuff?

Remind yourself about US hypocrisy concerning WMDs when you talk about red lines . When you have used them yourselves on numerous occasions and aided and abetted others in their use of them it kinda makes this fake moral stand look rather stupid

I don't believe the Douma attack was what the US/UK governments and subservient MSM would have us believe it was
 
Remind me who used WMD on his own people? Remember the RED line stuff?

Are you talking about the syphilis experiments conducted on Tuskegee Airman by the government in Washington? Or tests conducted with US personnel in the early stages of nuclear arms? Or maybe LSD experiments conducted on US personnel?

Yes, remind me, please.
 
No matter what the topic these days, the CTers always intrude with their nonsense.
 
No matter what the topic these days, the CTers always intrude with their nonsense.

Yessir, for so many the brutal truth causes too much anxiety. Pretend it doesn't exist. :lol: Cognitive dissonance in action.

For the record, experiments done on the Tuskegee Airmen was very much a conspiracy, but not a theory. Like so many inconvenient truths, it is a conspiracy fact.
 
Yessir, for so many the brutal truth causes too much anxiety. Pretend it doesn't exist. :lol: Cognitive dissonance in action.

For the record, experiments done on the Tuskegee Airmen was very much a conspiracy, but not a theory. Like so many inconvenient truths, it is a conspiracy fact.

You may want to try the truth in regards to the USS Liberty, 9/11, etc.

It would be refreshing.
 
Back
Top Bottom