• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Expert: Syria Deployment Pushing the Limits of Russian Military Capability

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,171
Reaction score
82,445
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Expert: Syria Deployment Pushing the Limits of Russian Military Capability

tka_02.jpg

Russian military supplies on the way to Syria

5/17/18

While the Kremlin’s newly professionalized military is armed with top-of-the-line ship-launched cruise missiles, flying more capable strike aircraft and firing precision munitions Russia, “does not have the ability to sustain forces far from the border,” a military expert said on Wednesday. “Syria pushed Russian logistics to its limits,” Anton Lavrov, a visiting fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and affiliated with the Center for Analysis and Technologies in Moscow, said. Moscow’s logistical trouble in Syria to maintain the 5,000 personnel, helicopters and aircraft illustrate one of the serious shortfalls in President Vladimir Putin’s drive to pull Russia’s conventional and nuclear forces out of their post-Soviet decay. “Russia doesn’t have the capability to sustain 20,000” troops in continuous operations far from its borders for any length of time. Even getting there is a challenge — from pier to pier, Lavrov said. The Kremlin had to buy old Black Sea merchant ships in Crimea and convert them into transports to move the soldiers and equipment including large trucks and heavy artillery, to its base in Syria and ports under the control of President Bashar al-Assad. And that was for movement into an uncontested area at the water’s edge.

Lavrov said the Russian public, like the American, “don’t want high casualties” in the Kremlin’s interventions even in the “near abroad,” like Ukraine and Georgia, and most certainly further from their borders like Syria. Russians have been engaged in the Syrian civil war for almost three years. They want its military leaders “to use technical superiority to fight” over putting “boots on the ground” or, when needed, use proxies for ground combat over committing Russian troops. “Russian leaders must hear the people,” he added. Lavrov said the impact of sanctions following the taking of Crimea and backing separatists in Ukraine first meant to modernize that former Soviet research and development projects that were feasible got the go ahead. Now after fielding them, like the precision munitions used in Syria, the Russians are looking at what will be the new tanks, fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, long-range drones with strike capabilities and laser-protection systems that they will need in the future.
To sustain the modernization effort and professionalization of the officer corps and ranks under those conditions, Russia needs to “scrap some programs.” Seventy percent of its announced defense budget goes to equipment, he added.


Moscow must supply its military forces in Syria (at least 95% of supplies) via slow moving supply ships that begin their journey in Russian ports on the Black Sea and wind up at the Syrian port of Tartus in the eastern Mediterranean. The supply chain must then be resumed in reverse. Occasionally, the Kremlin/Wagner will rotate troops in/out at Damascus International via commercial air carrier.
 
Expert: Syria Deployment Pushing the Limits of Russian Military Capability

tka_02.jpg

Russian military supplies on the way to Syria




Moscow must supply its military forces in Syria (at least 95% of supplies) via slow moving supply ships that begin their journey in Russian ports on the Black Sea and wind up at the Syrian port of Tartus in the eastern Mediterranean. The supply chain must then be resumed in reverse. Occasionally, the Kremlin/Wagner will rotate troops in/out at Damascus International via commercial air carrier.

You could be right or else the Russians try to do these things with realistic budgets. Maybe they don't even have any $800 hammers. The USA way is not necessarily the correct way but it is the most profitable way for the MIC. Maybe the US could take a lesson here.
/
 
I do not believe they are stretching the limits, rather they are pushing their comfortable logistics since they prefer land based logistics. However going by ship is not a bad thing at all, the us military uses them quite often to ship military equipment and supplies around the world, Because truthfully trying to send a full brigade and their equipment over to the middle east all by plane is extremely expensive. What I usually see is most troops sent by air with much of their equipment sent by sea long before they deploy.

Also sea shipments work great for re supply as they usually have a constant flow, so delivery time is not an issue except for the initial delivery.
 
Back
Top Bottom