• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Officer of the deck during fatal Fitzgerald collision pleads guilty at court-martial

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,132
Reaction score
82,397
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Officer of the deck during fatal Fitzgerald collision pleads guilty at court-martial

BR5TAM6TJJG7NCWSV4TZ7USRJI.jpg

Inside the USS Fitzgerald after collision

5/9/18

A junior officer who oversaw navigation of the destroyer Fitzgerald when it collided with a hulking merchant vessel on June 17, killing seven sailors, pleaded guilty to a dereliction of duty charge during a special court-martial Tuesday. Lt. j.g. Sarah Coppock received a punitive letter and will forfeit half a month’s pay for three months as part of her sentence, according to a Navy statement. “The Navy will not accept complacency, negligence, or other behaviors contrary to its core values,” the release states. As part of her pretrial agreement, Coppock waived her right to an administrative discharge board, where a panel would have decided whether she would stay in the Navy or not. Navy spokesman William Speaks declined to say Tuesday what Coppock’s final fate in uniform will entail. “As of right now, she remains on active duty,” he said.

Coppock was serving as officer of the deck, or OOD, at the time of the collision, and was accused of failing to follow the commanding officer’s standing orders, as well as international navigation rules. She was supposed to communicate with the ship’s combat information center, report ship contacts to the skipper, operate safely in high-density traffic and warn the crew of imminent collisions, according to her charge sheet. Navy officials declined to provide a copy of Coppock’s plea deal or any statement of fact for the case. The ship’s captain, Cmdr. Bryce Benson, was asleep, and the Crystal’s bow punched into his quarters. He was injured and rescued by crew members as he clung to the side of the ship. He faces an Article 32 hearing to determine if he will be court-martialed later this month. Two juniors officers will face their own Article 32 relating to the Fitz disaster on Wednesday at the Navy Yard in Washington.

IMO, she should be charged with criminal negligence and manslaughter.
 
If there is already a guilty plea to one charge, what room is there to really change or add to the charges?
 
The fact that the penalty was SO light, 1/2 pay for 3 months, leads me to believe that they think her
subordinates were the cause, and she did not properly supervise them.
We will have to see what is handed down to the Two juniors officers today.
If they get sent to prison, we will know they find greater fault with them.
 
If there is already a guilty plea to one charge, what room is there to really change or add to the charges?

We will never really learn what happened.

The description based on the charges is she piloted the ship blindly and no one at the radar posts informed her that she was either going to hit the Cliffs of Dover or the 730-foot freighter ACX Crystal, stacked with more than 1,000 containers. You have at least three look outs and radar, and a small navy vessel like that can maneuver like a witch relative to other shipping.

Either A: "somebody wasn’t paying attention".
or B: Someone was asleep.
or C: Something was going on we aren't being told.

And no one summoned the Captain, which is protocol.

F'ing Chinese are laughing their asses off.
 
The fact that the penalty was SO light, 1/2 pay for 3 months, leads me to believe that they think her
subordinates were the cause, and she did not properly supervise them.
We will have to see what is handed down to the Two juniors officers today.
If they get sent to prison, we will know they find greater fault with them.

The sentence might seem light but I’m guessing her Navy career is effectively over as well.
 
AH.. So women drive ships like they drive cars....

Never paying attention

djl
 
The fact that the penalty was SO light, 1/2 pay for 3 months, leads me to believe that they think her
subordinates were the cause, and she did not properly supervise them.
We will have to see what is handed down to the Two juniors officers today.
If they get sent to prison, we will know they find greater fault with them.
My thought is that the CO/XO may also be blamed for here performance, e.g. failure to property train her.
 
The sentence might seem light but I’m guessing her Navy career is effectively over as well.
She's reached her terminal rank without question. She waived an administrative discharge board so my guess is that she's counting on finishing her time, getting passed over for promotion twice and then getting a Good Conduct discharge.
 
Back
Top Bottom