BobDick
Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 15
- Location
- The Heavens
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
So Syria had equipment that was 30 years old and yet they successfully shot down most of their rockets. M'kay.
To show my attempt to answer your '...is Russia/Putin good or bad' question.
its TV.ru propaganda, solonin got them right
if they did it, where are these ? LOL
???? ??????? - ???????????? ???? ????????. ???????? ????????
Well, other than that not being from the latest attack, what is your point?
I found the exact same picture, of an Oxygen Sensor, from April 2017. It was posted on Twitter last year.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...763924332544&usg=AOvVaw3QY8kxBaN4M-8Wmp3Rx6Pv
So if you are using this picture and trying to claim it is from this attack, you failed.
So Syria had equipment that was 30 years old and yet they successfully shot down most of their rockets. M'kay.
not me but historian Solonin, calmed that Muscovite c-300, shot down nothing ...that TV.ru spreads propaganda
They very well may have shot down a few. But nowhere near the figure of 71 that they have been trying to claim. If they said from 1-5 I might believe it. Maybe even as high as 10. But 71 out of 100? No freaking way.
And even if the roles were reversed and this was a salvo launched at a US facility, I would have strong questions about the US claiming to shoot down 71 out of 100 cruise missiles by ground launched missiles. Ground launched missiles are simply not that effective against cruise missiles. Since WWII the system of choice to shoot down cruise missiles are fighter launched air to air missiles.
Ground based are simply the wrong platform to claim such a high number of intercepts, unless the target city is as heavily defended as say Moscow.