• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump’s Militarization of the US-Mexico Border Won’t Come Cheap

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,281
Reaction score
82,665
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump’s Militarization of the US-Mexico Border Won’t Come Cheap

defense-large.jpg


April 5, 2018

Donald Trump has been unable to get funding from Congress for the “big, beautiful wall” he promised voters he would build on the US-Mexico border, so he offered up a new plan Tuesday (April 3): install US military troops there instead. Adding troops to the US’s nearly 2,000-mile-long border with Mexico isn’t a new idea. Both presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush tried it. Both times, US diplomats, local business people, and some lawmakers called it an expensive failure. In July of 2010, Obama ordered up “Operation Phalanx,” dispatching 1,200 National Guard troops to the border. The Obama order was an extension of “Operation Jump Start,” a 2006 Bush policy that sent 6,000 National Guard troops to the US-Mexico border, where they did everything from help seize drugs to rescue a drowning Central American woman. Operation Phalanx cost $145 million for 14 months, while Operation Jump Start cost $1.2 billion over two years. Both operations took resources from other Department of Defense projects, while failing to establish a transparent US-Mexico border security policy, the Government Accountability Office said in a critical 35-page report.

Complicating matters, Pentagon rules meant that the National Guard was unable to confront or detain suspects, thus they needed to call CBP officers if they saw someone they suspected of smuggling drugs or entering illegally. Like many of Trump’s off-the-cuff policy announcements, the notion of putting military on the US-Mexico border seemed to come as a complete surprise to the agencies involved and the people who could be affected. “That’s the first we’re hearing of it,” said one union representative for border agents. An official with the Texas Border Coalition, a group of border lawmakers, mayors, and business people, said she was trying to find out more information. Spokespeople at the CBP and the Department of Homeland Security said they had no comment.

The back of the envelope plan is for 4,000 National Guardsmen from various states. Texas and Arizona have volunteered ~200 troops each. Oregon and Nevada said no thanks. California was non-committal. The NG troops can only act in a support role for CBP and cannot interdict/arrest anyone crossing the border. DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said on Wednesday that the military can only construct a wall/fence on DoD-owned land that abuts the border.

It's basically window dressing that has been employed by many presidents. The CBP has 2,024 funded positions that remain vacant. CBP agents quit/retire faster than new applicants can be hired.

Related: Every president since Reagan has deployed troops to the border
 
Back
Top Bottom