• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russia's Putin reveals 'invincible' nuclear weapons

Litwin said:
Muscovy doesn't have modern nukes, its all fake , show for the cowards , USA must strike Vova and and his Nigeria in snow as soon as better
Click to expand...

what does that look like?
 
Helix said:
what does that look like?
Click to expand...

SraOTNB.jpg
 
Litwin said:
Muscovy doesn't have modern nukes, its all fake , show for the cowards , USA must strike Vova and and his Nigeria in snow as soon as better
Click to expand...

On the Internet, there is an opinion that the life of Russian nuclear missiles expires in 2019. But I would not discount the Russian military threat. I think you should not play "Russian roulette" regarding Russian nuclear weapons. The unleashing of any war, the more nuclear one, is an insane step in all respects. Any empire or dictatorship sooner or later collapses under the pressure of its own contradictions. Do not squeeze the abscess until it is well ripe.
 
Vlad Dreamer said:
On the Internet, there is an opinion that the life of Russian nuclear missiles expires in 2019. But I would not discount the Russian military threat. I think you should not play "Russian roulette" regarding Russian nuclear weapons. The unleashing of any war, the more nuclear one, is an insane step in all respects. Any empire or dictatorship sooner or later collapses under the pressure of its own contradictions. Do not squeeze the abscess until it is well ripe.
Click to expand...

one way or another , the Juchi Khan´s project has done ...just matter of time ...
 
Litwin said:
we ´d use Nuclear_bunker_buster against Kremlin thugs in order to stop all wars
Click to expand...

so you advocate a preemptive nuclear strike on Russia? what does the next step look like? how does the whole thing play out?
 
Hawkeye10 said:
What the Russians have been able to do with really limited funds and on the back of massive infrastructure deficiencies we need to be standing at attention for.

This is important.
Click to expand...

Naw. We need to keep being belligerent. We need to keep moving troops and weapons closer to their borders. We need more sanctions and hostility.
 
Helix said:
if anyone launches a modern nuke, we're probably looking at a chain reaction back to the dark ages; more specifically, a version of the dark ages which includes vast areas of the earth which will be uninhabitable for a very long time.

i understand that we are primates who generally think in a tribal "us" and "them" dynamic until a common "them" emerges. i generally try to be sympathetic with this mindset, as i am not immune to it myself. how could i be? it's innate. it came with the computer, and deleting it is very difficult. however, if we don't get our **** together as a species, we are in trouble, and i would be remiss for not pointing that out.

we now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
Click to expand...
I'm a man old enough, and I remember the period of Leonid Brezhnev's reign. Although he was a Communist to the core, however, he proclaimed the struggle for peace the main goal of his life. Because he remembered all the horrors of the war that he had to face during the Second World War II, where he was a participant. And in addition, he can fully imagine the consequences of modern nuclear war.

Unfortunately, in the face of the current Russian leaders, I do not see such a desire for peace. On the contrary, there is an aggressive policy and rhetoric. This is because Putin did not see the horrors of the war that Brezhnev had to endure.
Moreover, some modern leaders allow themselves to threaten the world community with their nuclear arsenals and proclaim the state of things that they can use this weapon under certain conditions.

This blackmail may well lead to direct practical action. I regret to explain that the presence of such not quite adequate leaders as Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin threatens the very existence of mankind.

For some several decades of the existence of nuclear weapons, we have witnessed the emergence of such irresponsible politicians. Unfortunately, this proves that our civilization is in reality very unstable and vulnerable.
 
Helix said:
so you advocate a preemptive nuclear strike on Russia? what does the next step look like? how does the whole thing play out?
Click to expand...

on "Nigeria with snow" (c) S. Brin . the next step will be

cdd53ba1016c0b46886ea8052e704e50.jpg
 
Thoreau72 said:
Naw. We need to keep being belligerent. We need to keep moving troops and weapons closer to their borders. We need more sanctions and hostility.
Click to expand...

That was what caused the problem between Russia and the West in the first place.

We can do better.
 
Litwin said:
on "Nigeria with snow" (c) S. Brin . the next step will be

cdd53ba1016c0b46886ea8052e704e50.jpg
Click to expand...

Your grasp of what nuclear war would look like is so poor that further discussion is a waste of my time.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Russia's Putin reveals 'invincible' nuclear weapons



The new hypersonic conventional/nuclear cruise missiles (5 m/s) and their ability to evade interception are almost a battlefield reality.
Click to expand...

Pavel Felgenhauer about Putin´s imitations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K20jZeT2Z-E

"Pavel Felgenhauer - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavel_Felgenhauer

Pavel Eugenievich Felgenhauer is a Russian military analyst known for his publications about Russia's political and military leadership. Contents. [hide]. 1 Biography; 2 Views; 3 References; 4 Sources. Biography[edit]. Felgenhauer was born in 1951 in Moscow, the Soviet Union and graduated from Moscow State University ..."
 
Mr Person said:
Yes and no.

Missile Defense can only do so much. If one of the powers nuked the other with a hypersonic cruise missile, a massive response with existing nukes would be more than sufficient to end life in the country, possibly on most of the planet. (Aren't we humans awesome?)



Even if this is entirely truthful, they could get past all missile defense with an all-out first strike launch. I'm not sure it changes all that much.
Click to expand...

But the popular Nuclear Winter scenario would mean Mutually Assured Destruction. Putin is not self-destructive.
 
Litwin said:
the leading Muscovite military expert Alexander Goltz, says that all Putin´s "new" military technologies are fake.
Click to expand...

In politics and economics, a Potemkin village (also Potyomkin village, derived from the Russian: потёмкинские деревни, Russian pronunciation: [pɐˈtʲɵmkʲɪnskʲɪɪ dʲɪˈrʲɛvnʲɪ] potyomkinskiye derevni) is any construction (literal or figurative) built solely to deceive others into thinking that a situation is better than it is.
 
JacksinPA said:
But the popular Nuclear Winter scenario would mean Mutually Assured Destruction. Putin is not self-destructive.
Click to expand...

Well, that's my point.


Yes, the new weapons could certainly better evade any attempts to knock them out of the sky, but because of MAD it's not really a threat. He's not going to try to nuke D.C. with one of the new weapons anymore than he would with an old-school ICBM.
 
JacksinPA said:
In politics and economics, a Potemkin village (also Potyomkin village, derived from the Russian: потёмкинские деревни, Russian pronunciation: [pɐˈtʲɵmkʲɪnskʲɪɪ dʲɪˈrʲɛvnʲɪ] potyomkinskiye derevni) is any construction (literal or figurative) built solely to deceive others into thinking that a situation is better than it is.
Click to expand...

+1, this what Muscovite empire has always done "best" . the second leading Muscovite military expert Pavel_Felgenhauer talks about putler´s Potemkin nuke - village
use subtitles


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavel_Felgenhauer
 
Let us not use the word "invincible" and weapon in a realistic feasible way. There has never been nor will there be a such thing as an invincible weapon. Although nuclear weapons are devastating and almost apocalyptic in nature they are by no means invincible and even if a interception device doesn't exist now , there is no guarantee that it also wont in the future. We also would do well to remember that although the Russian Federation strains to put on a show to make up for the huge losses it took after its so called "independence" they are a fearsome force to be reckoned with economically, politically, and militarily and there fore although not invincible they are incredibly dangerous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom