• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Steve Bannon is the voice of reason????

joG said:
Don't be silly. Of course, we don't have the stomach for it.
Click to expand...

Since about 100% of all the military generals and governments involved don't know what you apparently know, please explain what exactly you are talking about.
 
Dragonfly said:
Since about 100% of all the military generals and governments involved don't know what you apparently know, please explain what exactly you are talking about.
Click to expand...

Oh. They know. You know too, unless you are much less intelligent than I had thought.
But nobody wants to mention it at this point.
 
joG said:
Oh. They know. You know too, unless you are much less intelligent than I had thought.
But nobody wants to mention it at this point.
Click to expand...

No seriously. Please explain exactly what you mean.
 
justabubba said:
grenada ... at least we won that one
Click to expand...

Yeah those couple hundred construction workers learned their lesson, might as well throw Panama in as well... :roll:

The key to that one is attack tiny neighbor nations that really are no threat.... :peace
 
joG said:
We have not really had the stomach for wars faught in a way to shield Americans from grief. PS: the wars you mention were all quite different and would each have to be cost benefitted on their own. With the exception of Iraq/Afghanistan, where we probably should have pulled out immediately and turned responsibility over to the un, I think you would find that the benefits outweighed the costs.
Click to expand...

Apparently you are no student of history but a rather clueless armchair fantasy reader...

'We' have no stomach for wars of empire that cost so much and gain so little. (No nation has, but again, you are no student of history)

You pretend crushing one regime would automatically created a nation filled with peace, love and democracy... :roll:

You would be one of the few warhawks that believes the UN is mission capable... :roll:

History has shown an in and out strategy rarely creates a stable, friendly regime. The costs of the initial invasion are paltry compared to creating a friendly regime when done- why spend American lives and treasure to leave an unstable hot mess for other small nations to attempt to stabilize??? :confused:
 
joG said:
But nobody wants to mention it at this point.
Click to expand...

Especially YOU.

Come on man. Tell us exactly what you mean.

Explain how the USofA, or some other country (or coalition of countries) in the world could wage war on NK and NOT have it result in millions of deaths in SK.

Be clear and specific.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom