• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is China battle ready?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fledermaus said:
Still waiting for the apology you owe those you maliciously libeled.

BTW - You are in no position to order around anyone who actually served. IF you served that little ability ended the day your commission did.

Then again an officer would have known that.

Thinking about it. You require my apology before you will apologize to hundreds of thousands...

How petty.
Click to expand...


You gunny denied my honorable military service before you knew anything about it from my posts.

When my reply to your denial was that I'd served honorably on active military duty you denied the veracity and truth of my statement. You did that immediately and absolutely. Out of the blue.

You and a gang of other rightwingers lead by a group of retired lifer NCO's or by other rightwingers who'd served much as I'd served, i.e., for a tour of duty and no more (or more than a single tour but not a career, as in 20 years or more than) opened a thread to pursue the denial.

The rightwingers can't stand that there is present here a veteran of honorable military service who isn't a fellow rightwinger. Having a veteran present of an opposite political and cultural persuasion is perhaps unique. It further challenges and neutralizes the posting dominance youse on the right have always had of matters military from the standpoint of veterans of active duty military service.

Most of the others have however dropped their challenge. They don't post about it any more and not for some months now. Indeed, only you Gunny spend time in your life as a retired lifer NCO rightwinger posting numerous posts daily that deny my active duty honorable service while you repeat the same same thing in each post...over 100+ pages of same same posts to several threads over several months (since November in fact).

In December I wuz advised from above not to use the word "loser" in my identification terminology of you back then as a retired career lifer loser NCO rightwinger. So since being advised by proper authority I dropped the word "loser" from my descriptive identification of you as a retired career lifer NCO rightwinger. So I accept that the word "loser" in the description of you is off limits to the postings. I still do think of it however. So enuff said about it at this point.

Gunnery Sergeant.
 
Tangmo said:
You gunny denied my honorable military service before you knew anything about it from my posts.

When my reply to your denial was that I'd served honorably on active military duty you denied the veracity and truth of my statement. You did that immediately and absolutely. Out of the blue.

You and a gang of other rightwingers lead by a group of retired lifer NCO's or by other rightwingers who'd served much as I'd served, i.e., for a tour of duty and no more (or more than a single tour but not a career, as in 20 years or more than) opened a thread to pursue the denial.

The rightwingers can't stand that there is present here a veteran of honorable military service who isn't a fellow rightwinger. Having a veteran present of an opposite political and cultural persuasion is perhaps unique. It further challenges and neutralizes the posting dominance youse on the right have always had of matters military from the standpoint of veterans of active duty military service.

Most of the others have however dropped their challenge. They don't post about it any more and not for some months now. Indeed, only you Gunny spend time in your life as a retired lifer NCO rightwinger posting numerous posts daily that deny my active duty honorable service while you repeat the same same thing in each post...over 100+ pages of same same posts to several threads over several months (since November in fact).

In December I wuz advised from above not to use the word "loser" in my identification terminology of you back then as a retired career lifer loser NCO rightwinger. So since being advised by proper authority I dropped the word "loser" from my descriptive identification of you as a retired career lifer NCO rightwinger. So I accept that the word "loser" in the description of you is off limits to the postings. I still do think of it however. So enuff said about it at this point.

Gunnery Sergeant.
Click to expand...

See Tangmo

See Tangmo babble

Babble Tangmo babble......

How could I deny that which I did not know about?

The rest is the usual Tangmo *stuff*

You need not reply unless it is to render an apology to all NCOs, career military, etc.
 
Fledermaus said:
Still waiting for the apology you owe those you maliciously libeled.

BTW - You are in no position to order around anyone who actually served. IF you served that little ability ended the day your commission did.

Then again an officer would have known that.

Thinking about it. You require my apology before you will apologize to hundreds of thousands...

How petty.
Click to expand...


No need of me to apologize to any veteran of honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States. I don't deny anyone's active duty military service as they represent it to DP. I wouldn't and haven't ever though to attempt to do any such thing. Not here, not ever, not anywhere and not at any time in respect of any veteran of honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States.

Gunny.

I therefore demand your apology. You arbitrarily and summarily deny my honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States. My voluntary service during a time when there was military conscription in the United States. My voluntary participation in university ROTC at a time in the country's history when ROTC was unpopular in the extreme on college campuses and throughout much of the society besides. And during a war that was extremely unpopular and which tore at the fabric of American society and communities; families.

Although I did not go to Vietnam, I did after my honorable separation from active duty military service work formally with Vietnam veterans in their readjustment to civilian life and in their rehabilitation after their in-country war experience over there. My committment to these our veterans, and to the issues is a matter of the formal record and is unquestioned anywhere and everywhere. Except by you Gunny.

Shame on you Gunny.

And shameless you are.

Arrogant and arbitrary. Disrespectful and contemptable. Despicable.

Gunnery Sergeant.
 
Fledermaus said:
See Tangmo

See Tangmo babble

Babble Tangmo babble......

How could I deny that which I did not know about?

The rest is the usual Tangmo *stuff*

You need not reply unless it is to render an apology to all NCOs, career military, etc.
Click to expand...


I have two words for you Gunny.

And they are...

...have a nice day.

I allow for a madness when I see it. There is a limit however.
 
Tangmo said:
No need of me to apologize to any veteran of honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States. I don't deny anyone's active duty military service as they represent it to DP. I wouldn't and haven't ever though to attempt to do any such thing. Not here, not ever, not anywhere and not at any time in respect of any veteran of honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States.

Gunny.

I therefore demand your apology. You arbitrarily and summarily deny my honorable service to the United States in the armed forces of the United States. My voluntary service during a time when there was military conscription in the United States. My voluntary participation in university ROTC at a time in the country's history when ROTC was unpopular in the extreme on college campuses and throughout much of the society besides. And during a war that was extremely unpopular and which tore at the fabric of American society and communities; families.

Although I did not go to Vietnam, I did after my honorable separation from active duty military service work formally with Vietnam veterans in their readjustment to civilian life and in their rehabilitation after their in-country war experience over there. My committment to these our veterans, and to the issues is a matter of the formal record and is unquestioned anywhere and everywhere. Except by you Gunny.

Shame on you Gunny.

And shameless you are.

Arrogant and arbitrary. Disrespectful and contemptable. Despicable.

Gunnery Sergeant.
Click to expand...

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
 
Fledermaus said:
So, no apology to those you have libeled.

Got it.
Click to expand...


Let's hope you got it Gunny. Whatever, read all about this.

That is, how most of the career professional military in the Iraq Operation with only some exception at Central Command violated virtually every principle of von Clausewitz....


OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM: WHAT WENT WRONG? A CLAUSEWITZIAN ANALYSIS

By Clayton Dennison, Center for Military and Strategic Studies, University of Calgary

in key areas of decision making, in the planning and execution stages of O.I.F., U.S. strategists either misapplied, or disavowed altogether, those principles of strategy most recognized and esteemed in Western military academies, those codified in Carl von Clausewitz’s book On War.4 [T]these decisions had negative consequences which undermined the U.S. war effort.6

According to the late Michael Handel, a former professor at the U.S. Naval War College, Clausewitzian principles helped analysts identify U.S. strategic errors in Vietnam, formed the doctrinal basis of the Weinberger and Powell Doctrines [of overwhelming force], and provided a strong foundation for a successful strategy in the Persian Gulf War.

The insurgency that spiraled out of control in the immediate aftermath of O.I.F. had more to do with the flawed, antiClausewitzian, strategic decision making of U.S. military planners than with international or locally grown terrorists promoting global jihad. Rumsfeld and his generals misidentified Iraq’s center of gravity from the war’s outset. They incorrectly believed that the outcome of the war hinged on defeating Saddam’s Republican guard units and victory would be sealed with the occupation of Baghdad. As it turned out, however, the paramilitary Fedayeen and various other insurgent groups were the greatest military challenge and what was required to seal the victory was the support of the Iraqi people themselves, especially in the Sunni Triangle.

http://jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/viewFile/105/115


In a direct contrast, General Colin Powell as Chairman of JCS in 1991 chose the right guy to head Central Command and to strategize and execute Operation Desert Storm. First and foremost, O.D.S. commander General "Stormin" Norman Swartzkopft got the overwhelming force he needed from Gen. Powell.

The late Gen. Swartzkopft used deception and large unit (division) sweeping and sudden mobile maneuver warfare of Army and Marines to demolish the Iraqi armed forces -- in 100 hours. The shock and awe victory included a comprehensive air campaign to set up the successful land warfare.

In the succinct words of General Swartzkopft, "Yesterday Iraq had the 4th largest army in the world. Today they have the second largest army in Iraq." A strategic confluence existed for the general to storm Baghdad and remake Iraq then and there. However, as we know, Potus Bush 41 prohibited any move against Baghdad, thus setting up the Bush 43 disaster of a decade later that was overseen and executed by idiots in uniforms and without uniforms.

In O.I.F. in 2003 the strategic and operational genius of General Tommy Franks to seize Baghdad in only three weeks went wasted from immediately afterward by the underwhelming numbers of U.S. forces assigned to the operation. Gen. Franks wanted a greater force strength than SecDef Rumsfeld was willing to provide. Rumsfeld went so far as to sidline the members of the JCS who agreed with Gen. Franks, such as Army CoS Gen. Eric Shinseki who was chief advocate in Washington of a force strength of 500K rather than the fewer than 200K the U.S. did commit as the baseline force.

It is ominous in the present dimension that Trump has reduced the stature and influence of the current Chairman of JCS, General "Fighting Joe" Dunford of USMC. Trump has excluded Gen. Dunford from National Security Council meetings to instead include the uniquely American fascist Stephen Bannon.
 
Last edited:
Tangmo said:
Let's hope you got it Gunny. Whatever, read all about this.

That is, how most of the career professional military in the Iraq Operation with only some exception at Central Command violated virtually every principle of von Clausewitz....


OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM: WHAT WENT WRONG? A CLAUSEWITZIAN ANALYSIS

By Clayton Dennison, Center for Military and Strategic Studies, University of Calgary

in key areas of decision making, in the planning and execution stages of O.I.F., U.S. strategists either misapplied, or disavowed altogether, those principles of strategy most recognized and esteemed in Western military academies, those codified in Carl von Clausewitz’s book On War.4 [T]these decisions had negative consequences which undermined the U.S. war effort.6

According to the late Michael Handel, a former professor at the U.S. Naval War College, Clausewitzian principles helped analysts identify U.S. strategic errors in Vietnam, formed the doctrinal basis of the Weinberger and Powell Doctrines [of overwhelming force], and provided a strong foundation for a successful strategy in the Persian Gulf War.

The insurgency that spiraled out of control in the immediate aftermath of O.I.F. had more to do with the flawed, antiClausewitzian, strategic decision making of U.S. military planners than with international or locally grown terrorists promoting global jihad. Rumsfeld and his generals misidentified Iraq’s center of gravity from the war’s outset. They incorrectly believed that the outcome of the war hinged on defeating Saddam’s Republican guard units and victory would be sealed with the occupation of Baghdad. As it turned out, however, the paramilitary Fedayeen and various other insurgent groups were the greatest military challenge and what was required to seal the victory was the support of the Iraqi people themselves, especially in the Sunni Triangle.

http://jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/viewFile/105/115


In a direct contrast, General Colin Powell as Chairman of JCS in 1991 chose the right guy to head Central Command and to strategize and execute Operation Desert Storm. First and foremost, O.D.S. commander General "Stormin" Norman Swartzkopft got the overwhelming force he needed from Gen. Powell.

The late Gen. Swartzkopft used deception and large unit (division) sweeping and sudden mobile maneuver warfare of Army and Marines to demolish the Iraqi armed forces -- in 100 hours. The shock and awe victory included a comprehensive air campaign to set up the successful land warfare.

In the succinct words of General Swartzkopft, "Yesterday Iraq had the 4th largest army in the world. Today they have the second largest army in Iraq." A strategic confluence existed for the general to storm Baghdad and remake Iraq then and there. However, as we know, Potus Bush 41 prohibited any move against Baghdad, thus setting up the Bush 43 disaster of a decade later that was overseen and executed by idiots in uniforms and without uniforms.

In O.I.F. in 2003 the strategic and operational genius of General Tommy Franks to seize Baghdad in only three weeks went wasted from immediately afterward by the underwhelming numbers of U.S. forces assigned to the operation. Gen. Franks wanted a greater force strength than SecDef Rumsfeld was willing to provide. Rumsfeld went so far as to sidline the members of the JCS who agreed with Gen. Franks, such as Army CoS Gen. Eric Shinseki who was chief advocate in Washington of a force strength of 500K rather than the fewer than 200K the U.S. did commit as the baseline force.

It is ominous in the present dimension that Trump has reduced the stature and influence of the current Chairman of JCS, General "Fighting Joe" Dunford of USMC. Trump has excluded Gen. Dunford from National Security Council meetings to instead include the uniquely American fascist Stephen Bannon.
Click to expand...


Hey look....

More Tangmo spew.

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
 
Tangmo said:
Let's hope you got it Gunny. Whatever, read all about this.

That is, how most of the career professional military in the Iraq Operation with only some exception at Central Command violated virtually every principle of von Clausewitz....


OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM: WHAT WENT WRONG? A CLAUSEWITZIAN ANALYSIS

By Clayton Dennison, Center for Military and Strategic Studies, University of Calgary

in key areas of decision making, in the planning and execution stages of O.I.F., U.S. strategists either misapplied, or disavowed altogether, those principles of strategy most recognized and esteemed in Western military academies, those codified in Carl von Clausewitz’s book On War.4 [T]these decisions had negative consequences which undermined the U.S. war effort.6

According to the late Michael Handel, a former professor at the U.S. Naval War College, Clausewitzian principles helped analysts identify U.S. strategic errors in Vietnam, formed the doctrinal basis of the Weinberger and Powell Doctrines [of overwhelming force], and provided a strong foundation for a successful strategy in the Persian Gulf War.

The insurgency that spiraled out of control in the immediate aftermath of O.I.F. had more to do with the flawed, antiClausewitzian, strategic decision making of U.S. military planners than with international or locally grown terrorists promoting global jihad. Rumsfeld and his generals misidentified Iraq’s center of gravity from the war’s outset. They incorrectly believed that the outcome of the war hinged on defeating Saddam’s Republican guard units and victory would be sealed with the occupation of Baghdad. As it turned out, however, the paramilitary Fedayeen and various other insurgent groups were the greatest military challenge and what was required to seal the victory was the support of the Iraqi people themselves, especially in the Sunni Triangle.

http://jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/viewFile/105/115


In a direct contrast, General Colin Powell as Chairman of JCS in 1991 chose the right guy to head Central Command and to strategize and execute Operation Desert Storm. First and foremost, O.D.S. commander General "Stormin" Norman Swartzkopft got the overwhelming force he needed from Gen. Powell.

The late Gen. Swartzkopft used deception and large unit (division) sweeping and sudden mobile maneuver warfare of Army and Marines to demolish the Iraqi armed forces -- in 100 hours. The shock and awe victory included a comprehensive air campaign to set up the successful land warfare.

In the succinct words of General Swartzkopft, "Yesterday Iraq had the 4th largest army in the world. Today they have the second largest army in Iraq." A strategic confluence existed for the general to storm Baghdad and remake Iraq then and there. However, as we know, Potus Bush 41 prohibited any move against Baghdad, thus setting up the Bush 43 disaster of a decade later that was overseen and executed by idiots in uniforms and without uniforms.

In O.I.F. in 2003 the strategic and operational genius of General Tommy Franks to seize Baghdad in only three weeks went wasted from immediately afterward by the underwhelming numbers of U.S. forces assigned to the operation. Gen. Franks wanted a greater force strength than SecDef Rumsfeld was willing to provide. Rumsfeld went so far as to sidline the members of the JCS who agreed with Gen. Franks, such as Army CoS Gen. Eric Shinseki who was chief advocate in Washington of a force strength of 500K rather than the fewer than 200K the U.S. did commit as the baseline force.

It is ominous in the present dimension that Trump has reduced the stature and influence of the current Chairman of JCS, General "Fighting Joe" Dunford of USMC. Trump has excluded Gen. Dunford from National Security Council meetings to instead include the uniquely American fascist Stephen Bannon.
Click to expand...


BTW - The above lays no blame on the NCOs.... So another TANGMOFAIL....
 
Fledermaus said:
Hey look....

More Tangmo spew.

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
Click to expand...


See you in court Gunny.

That is, if you can find a lawyer who is willing to take a guaranteed white elephant of a case that would get a summary dismissal by any judge in the USA even before a jury gets called. It's termed a summary dismissal because the judge throws out the plantiff due to the fact the evidence shows there is no case to try.

So Gunny what did you do during The Incompetence Era of the U.S. military post 1945?

And now here you are retired and in your Operation Tangmo Tantrum. Your OTT through more than a hundred combined pages in several threads over several months has done nothing more than entangmo you in the barbed wire of your own hapless career. I do thank you for your service whatever it was and wherever it wuz and wish along with everyone else youse could have done better than youse done managed to do.

Gunny.
 
Fledermaus said:
BTW - The above lays no blame on the NCOs.... So another TANGMOFAIL....
Click to expand...


It is well known NCOs are the backbone of the U.S. military.

As go the NCOs so goes the U.S. military. Gunny.

U.S. military has mostly spent the past 60 years in sick bay as doctors keep looking to find some vertebrae. Youse have been making our enemies to look like they have a 50 pound brain when they don't have any such weight, strength or power. Not even close to any of it.

Thank you for your service btw.
 
Tangmo said:
It is well known NCOs are the backbone of the U.S. military.

As go the NCOs so goes the U.S. military. Gunny.

U.S. military has mostly spent the past 60 years in sick bay as doctors keep looking to find some vertebrae. Youse have been making our enemies to look like they have a 50 pound brain when they don't have any such weight, strength or power. Not even close to any of it.

Thank you for your service btw.
Click to expand...

And more libel....

What would drive someone to lie like you do?

Oh, and no thank you for pretending.
 
Last edited:
Tangmo said:
See you in court Gunny.

That is, if you can find a lawyer who is willing to take a guaranteed white elephant of a case that would get a summary dismissal by any judge in the USA even before a jury gets called. It's termed a summary dismissal because the judge throws out the plantiff due to the fact the evidence shows there is no case to try.

So Gunny what did you do during The Incompetence Era of the U.S. military post 1945?

And now here you are retired and in your Operation Tangmo Tantrum. Your OTT through more than a hundred combined pages in several threads over several months has done nothing more than entangmo you in the barbed wire of your own hapless career. I do thank you for your service whatever it was and wherever it wuz and wish along with everyone else youse could have done better than youse done managed to do.

Gunny.
Click to expand...

Hey look....

More Tangmo spew.

Court isn't necessary Tangmo. Your own posts show you to be a liar. Proven ignorant about the military as well.

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
 
Fledermaus said:
Hey look....

More Tangmo spew.

Court isn't necessary Tangmo. Your own posts show you to be a liar. Proven ignorant about the military as well.

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
Click to expand...


So Gunny how many signatures do you have on your petition? The apology petition.

You do have a petition with dozens of signatures, right? Or a dozen signatures?? A half-dozen of 'em???

A Petition.

Or are you the only one aggreved over there on the right. Your military right of course...
 
So does this mean we all aren't really too worried about China?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Tangmo said:
So Gunny how many signatures do you have on your petition? The apology petition.

You do have a petition with dozens of signatures, right? Or a dozen signatures?? A half-dozen of 'em???

A Petition.

Or are you the only one aggreved over there on the right. Your military right of course...
Click to expand...

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...

You were wrong... In many ways.

But, no... Childlike in your attempts to distance yourself from the original libel. Then when you foolishly posts something that destroys your original claim do you learn? No. Do you retract? No. Like a child you double down on the lie.

My guess is the closest you got to serving is the Recruiter's office where you were rejected by the Evil NCOs.
 
Tangmo said:
So Gunny how many signatures do you have on your petition? The apology petition.

You do have a petition with dozens of signatures, right? Or a dozen signatures?? A half-dozen of 'em???

A Petition.

Or are you the only one aggreved over there on the right. Your military right of course...
Click to expand...

.Is this our Tangmo?

ceremonial-guard-on-duty-in-chiang-kai-shek-memorial-hall-taipei-taiwan-DAB4N4.jpg
 
Fledermaus said:
Hey look....

More Tangmo spew.

Still waiting for you, the one that blatantly libels honorable veterans, specifically the NCOs and career military, to apologize for your slurs...
Click to expand...


Well Gunny my research assistant got a light bulb illuminated over her head so she decided to do some counting. Time on her hands at the moment kind of thing in addition to the amazement (and the fright) of it all.

My RA counts 63 posts by you to me since the top of page 22, all of 'em about the same same stuff stuff. The demand of an apology...I didn't serve my country in active duty military service...I'm libeling certain people...I don't know anything about the military or military service...blah blah blurp blurp and so on.

That stuff. Repeated and repeated in, I say again for effect, 63 posts by you to me since the top of page 22 alone.

So I reiterate further than I allow for a madness when I see it. And we see a lot of it. A hellovalot of it...the madness of it.

So you do have a petition of course.

PM it to me plse thx. ASAP at this point ok?

Cause the people who initiate madness and sleep and eat well throughout are the people I and many others have concerns about. The guy who has no restraint and no conscience or guilt, no reservations, no limits, no balance, no perspective, no hesitation and the like over there. Just machine-like behaviors. Compulsions and obsessions done in a cold and calculated repetition over an extended period of time.
 
Last edited:
Tangmo said:
Well Gunny my research assistant got a light bulb illuminated over her head so she decided to do some counting. Time on her hands at the moment kind of thing in addition to the amazement (and the fright) of it all.

My RA counts 63 posts by you to me since the top of page 22, all of 'em about the same same stuff stuff. The demand of an apology...I didn't serve my country in active duty military service...I'm libeling certain people...I don't know anything about the military or military service...blah blah blurp blurp and so on.

That stuff. Repeated and repeated in, I say again for effect, 63 posts by you to me since the top of page 22 alone.

So I reiterate further than I allow for a madness when I see it. And we see a lot of it. A hellovalot of it...the madness of it.

So you do have a petition of course.

PM it to me plse thx. ASAP at this point ok?

Cause the people who initiate madness and sleep and eat well throughout are the people I and many others have concerns about. The guy who has no restraint and no conscience or guilt, no reservations, no limits, no balance, no perspective, no hesitation and the like over there. Just machine-like behaviors. Compulsions and obsessions done in a cold and calculated repetition over an extend period of time.
Click to expand...

Hey, look... Blah, blah, blah.....

I gave you a venue to carry this on in. You refused. Wimped out as it were. You have no standing to whine about posts here....

Remember this post?

Fledermaus said:
Pathetic... Really.

I have to teach you how to use the website?

Go to -> NOTIFICATIONS -> Go to QUOTES -> Go to the thread that was created for you.

Now I can consider this intentional ignorance (most likely given your time here) or simple ignorance (you just don't know how to use the site).

Since you have been able in the past to find threads I can assume the first.
Click to expand...

Now why won't you go?

Don't like bare knuckles?
 
Tangmo said:
You can't read.

I said several times to several threads Air-Land battle remains the mode for Nato against Russia on the continent of Europe-Eurasia. It is the only way there to defend the geostrategic region.

You are instead trailing me and my posts stating willful contrarian bull**** for the sake of stating willful and contrarian bull****.

You are blind to my military expertise in strategy and geostrategic dimensions that originate in four years of university ROTC military education (and training). This is the case because an NCOs scope of military competence is limited to matters such as being in charge of latrine cleanup duty assignments of underlings.

All the same, thank you Gunny for your 20+ years of your limited competence military service to our great nation. We need youse guyz and we appreciate what it is your inherent limitations of performance allow.
Click to expand...
And you have zero actually knowledge about the crap you copy and paste. Pretending that 4 years at ROTC and 4 more in a ceremonial unit gives you any type of expertise is so laughable that it's hard to believe you could type it with a straight face.

And speaking of things you have zero knowledge about. One I am not a Gunny as that rank does not exist in the Army. Two I am not retired as I am currently serving, and finally that you think that is all enlisted are in charge of again further demonstrates just how little you actually know about the military.
 
braindrain said:
And you have zero actually knowledge about the crap you copy and paste. Pretending that 4 years at ROTC and 4 more in a ceremonial unit gives you any type of expertise is so laughable that it's hard to believe you could type it with a straight face.

And speaking of things you have zero knowledge about. One I am not a Gunny as that rank does not exist in the Army. Two I am not retired as I am currently serving, and finally that you think that is all enlisted are in charge of again further demonstrates just how little you actually know about the military.
Click to expand...


The kid here never said anything to you that you throw out in the second paragraph. Or to anyone. And who at a military thread does not know a Gunnery Sergeant is USMC.

Thank you for your current active duty service in AUS (Army of the United States, not 'Australia'). So I welcome the opportunity of your current active duty Army service to ask you for some inside scoop. Which is, to let us know on the QT when AUS is going to win one for a change in contrast to the past 70 years of failure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom