• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Zumwalt Breaks Down........ (Again!)

RetiredUSN

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
38,070
Reaction score
22,562
Location
Norfolk Virginia area.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
We stiil have naval superiority over ISIS - we are stlll on pace to defeat ISIS by 2050. ;)
 
Victory is not part of the plan for the Global War On Terror.

What matters is that the GWOT be waged. In perpetuity, it appears.
 
Victory is not part of the plan for the Global War On Terror.

What matters is that the GWOT be waged. In perpetuity, it appears.

It's like organized crime. It never stops.
 
The Navy is a wreck. All of the services are in bad shape post Obama, but I suspect that the Navy is the worst.

Fixing the military has to go at the top of the Trump Priority List.

I dont think Trump knows this yet.
 
Victory is not part of the plan for the Global War On Terror.

What matters is that the GWOT be waged. In perpetuity, it appears.

So true.

I am reminded of that Gore Vidal quote.

You can't have a war on a concept.

"terrorism" will exist forever on the globe. Always has, always will.

Francis Marion was considered a terrorist by the Brits.
John Mosby was considered a terrorist by the Yankees, then made an ambassador by Grant.
Bloody Bill Anderson WAS a terrorist by any standard.
The Israeli URGUN were considered terrorist by the Brits, then it became the Israeli Army, and one of its leaders became PM.
In antiquity the Sunni majority considered the Shiite assassins on their mountain top terrorists.

Pick any time in history and you will see one side calling the other "terrorists", in some form or another.
It is how a smaller force can keep a larger force occupied and busy through attrition.

So having a perpetual never ending WAR on this concept guarantees a blooded military with combat experience.

This was one of the reasons Queen Victoria had so many little bush wars the world over.

Then when you REALLY need them, you have some experienced troops who have "seen the elephant".
 
Last edited:
Where have the "Rickover" type Admirals all gone?

https://www.navytimes.com/articles/destroyer-zumwalt-breaks-down-and-gets-tow-in-panama-canal

A 4 billion dollar waste.

Today's Admirals spend more time on 18 week pregnancy vacations and political correctness issues................................ than they do with fighting ships.

Hm.

Maybe it's just cranky. Have we spent a lot of time and money studying what gender pronoun ships would like to be called? Maybe if we stopped aggressively gendering them, they would work better?


That sounds idiotic and like it would definitely reduce our ability to invest in combat capability; it should become one of the Pentagons' top 5 priorities.
 
Back
Top Bottom