• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More F35 bad news

Deuce said:
Yeah, because Congress will keep throwing money at it until it technically meets its contractual requirements.
Click to expand...

I am familiar with everything rolled out over the last half century even if it is just what I know from reading trade journals.
The F35 is not a failure by any method of observation I am equipped to use. I have witnessed far worse like the Sikorsky RAH-66, ,YAL-1, Lockheed Lancer. Cost over runs and bad mistakes don't kill good programs unless it kills pilots which the Osprey did. Turns out that even with 60mins uttering nonsense like they usually do the V22 is now a winner with 200 built and allies buying.
 
Deuce said:
Keep this post in mind next time you state "Bush's fault" in a thread where nobody has brought up Bush.

Incidentally, I've been flying planes for seventeen years.
Click to expand...

So you run lots of aviation program? Being a pilot doesn't count.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom