• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Illinois governor vetoes bill to raise minimum salary for teachers

Good old Blowjobavich is a Republican?

26 straight years of GOP crooked governors came before him!!!

Remember the Genesis of Illinois in the 1920s — crooked GOPs — Chicago Mayor — Illinois Governor — Al Capone —

Ohio has the worst and most illegal Racist Gerrymandering in the USA 🇺🇸 No More
 
Lol. Just because you don't like the story doesn't mean it's false. The Trib is pretty good about its sources and facts.

Yep, makes all the sense in the world to compare " Illinois teachers was set at $9,000 in July 1980.". with what they get today. :lol:
 
Minimum pay of $9000? What the **** is a teacher doing for $9000??? And if they are being paid THAT much? How can it be justified to pay that same person $40,000???

Naperville vs. Cairo.
 
Mismanagement in Illinois is certainly no secret. 1972 to 1976 is Dan Walker territory.

Doesn't have a lick to do with Bruce Rauner and the teacher minimum wage.

I did not say it did. As I posted, the root of the problem in Illinois is a unionized public sector, and the corrupt politicians who purchase union support with future benefits.
 
Yep, makes all the sense in the world to compare " Illinois teachers was set at $9,000 in July 1980.". with what they get today. :lol:

Lol. You think all teachers in Illinois today get paid $40,000 a year?
 
I did not say it did. As I posted, the root of the problem in Illinois is a unionized public sector, and the corrupt politicians who purchase union support with future benefits.

That's no secret. Rauner did his part to screw up the state also. They're all crooks.
 
[h=3]The Trouble with Public Sector Unions | National Affairs[/h]https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/.../the-trouble-with-public-sector-unions



If policymakers fail to rein in this growth, a fiscal crack-up will be the inevitable result. ... As the Wall Street Journal put it recently, public-sector unions "may be the single ... Indeed, the first president of the AFL-CIO, George Meany, believed it was ..... In the case of California, like that of Illinois, the unfunded pension liability ...
 
Illinois governor vetoes bill to raise minimum salary for teachers

90

Illinois Republican Governor Bruce Rauner.



Rauner, a multimillionaire, personally financed much of his campaign in 2014. However, his Democrat opponent in 2018 is J.B. Pritzker of the billionaire Pritzker family. Rauner's four year term has been a disaster (in fairness he has been blocked on many initiative's by the majority Democratic legislature) and I believe his term as governor will end in November. This will result in a reverse of the Federal problem .... the Illinois Dems will control all levers of state government plus the City of Chicago.

Related: Why Illinois is becoming more of a 'microcosm of national politics'

You truly don't understand how fragile school funding has been in Illinois. It spends more than any other state in the Midwest and is 13th in the US. Meanwhile outcomes are much lower than 13th.

Traditionally spending more on teachers has led to lots of revenue fights, strikes, and contentious spending bills.
 
You truly don't understand how fragile school funding has been in Illinois. It spends more than any other state in the Midwest and is 13th in the US. Meanwhile outcomes are much lower than 13th.

Traditionally spending more on teachers has led to lots of revenue fights, strikes, and contentious spending bills.

Lol. Don't get your panties in a bunch.

The OP intent is more about Rauner than school funding. I think his veto just about seals his fate in November.
 
Lol. Don't get your panties in a bunch.

The OP intent is more about Rauner than school funding. I think his veto just about seals his fate in November.

Your asinine comment is indicative of how you reflect bad policy as being the fault of a Republican when the bill being proposed is just bad policy. Illinois spends entirely too much per student for the results it gets. Spending more is not the problem. A democratic governor isn't going to fix that, its going to make it worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom