• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This truly sucks

are you ignoring the obvious? gun crime is really irrelevant objectively to gun rights but those who want to end gun rights use gun crime as the excuse to do so

well, it is obvious to me that politics from the Dem side does typically attempt to drive gun rights into the dirt but was wondering how you were viewing the gun rights concerns you previously voiced, since you did not directly explain ........

I left my crystal ball in a previous life
 
Last edited:
you seem unable to understand that Trump was the best of the two possible candidates. I didn't vote for Trump in the Primaries where there were BETTER candidates.

You missed the point entirely.

You based your case here on the fact that a politician changed his story. I feel like plenty of republicans flip flop wildly. Before, Obamacare's high premiums were horrible for the American public. Now that the AHCA/BCRA are going to result in higher premiums, i expect that makes all republicans who support either one RINOs.

Or, you could elaborate on your criteria for "RINO" as flip flopping doesn't seem sufficient.
 
You missed the point entirely.

You based your case here on the fact that a politician changed his story. I feel like plenty of republicans flip flop wildly. Before, Obamacare's high premiums were horrible for the American public. Now that the AHCA/BCRA are going to result in higher premiums, i expect that makes all republicans who support either one RINOs.

Or, you could elaborate on your criteria for "RINO" as flip flopping doesn't seem sufficient.

nah you missed the point its another case of wanting to complain for the sake of complaining.
 
nah you missed the point its another case of wanting to complain for the sake of complaining.

I'm asking you to elaborate on your criteria for RINO- you seem to be flip flopping wildly, unable or unwilling to provide a coherent explanation.
 
I'm asking you to elaborate on your criteria for RINO- you seem to be flip flopping wildly, unable or unwilling to provide a coherent explanation.

Lets see if you can understand

There are several other people running or intending to run against DeWhine in the primary who are solid conservatives and stick to a consistent theme. DeWhine has been proven to change his message -not over time-but daily depending on what he thinks his audience wants to hear. When he spoke to me at lunchtime before the reds opening day game, he saw me as an NRA member and spoke in a way that would cause an NRA member to support him. 4-5 hours later, I spoke to him as someone who was concerned about "gun violence" and he then spoke to me (not knowing he had already engaged me earlier that day) as if I was anti gun or at least hospitable to more restrictions on gun ownership.

that's different than what Trump has done and unlike the Governorship in Ohio, when it came time to vote for President, there was Trump-who had changed his positions on guns but has been consistently pro gun for at least a year leading up to the election versus a woman who has been a consistent hater of gun ownership for a quarter of a century.
 
Back
Top Bottom