• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran issues arrest warrant for Donald Trump over Qassem Suleimani killing

Tigerace117 said:
To overthrow a dictator who gassed his own people repeatedly.

Hmm.... sounds like someone you admire :lamo

The fantasy that if Saddam had stayed in power there would have been no sectarian violence simply lacks any evidence whatsoever .
Click to expand...
The irreversible damage US did and the unnecessary, unimaginable suffering they caused has evidence for it. The only question is, why are they excused when others would not be?

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
Yasureoktoo said:
There is little or no violence because they are under control.
There is lots of it within the secret confines of the government to dissenters.
That's how Muslim countries are run. An Iron fist, life or death, over the other Muslims.
Click to expand...

“Under control”

I wonder how under control Syria is right now? :roll:

This fantasy that a dictator can keep things “under control” is blatantly false. Sooner or later, people get tired of being brutally oppressed.

That’s also how numerous Christian European nations have been run over the years, so don’t even bother trying to pretend that that’s unique to the Muslim world.
 
MeSoNe said:
The irreversible damage US did and the unnecessary, unimaginable suffering they caused has evidence for it. The only question is, why are they excused when others would not be?

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

“Unimaginable suffering” is what the Kurds and anyone else who stepped “out of line” went through under Saddam.

Do you have a source for your claim that the US did anything remotely close to the atrocities he committed?
 
Tigerace117 said:
“Unimaginable suffering” is what the Kurds and anyone else who stepped “out of line” went through under Saddam.

Do you have a source for your claim that the US did anything remotely close to the atrocities he committed?
Click to expand...
Whataboutism. The US is guilty.

Such hideous crimes do not need to be measured against each other. In US for such actions in criminal court, without the excuse of being a soldier, one probably gets a death sentence. In Iraq, similarly, such crime would likely lead to a death sentence.

Do ou really think there should be a competition on who slaughtered people more/better/worse? Who tortured them better? Who committed 'better' war crimes? Are you quite serious?

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
Tigerace117 said:
Funny how it’s a-okay for Solemiani to order the killing of US soldiers, but not alright for the US to take him out in reprisal :roll:
Click to expand...


Well and n that case when will trump strike Putin???
 
Tigerace117 said:
To overthrow a dictator who gassed his own people repeatedly.

Hmm.... sounds like someone you admire :lamo

The fantasy that if Saddam had stayed in power there would have been no sectarian violence simply lacks any evidence whatsoever .
Click to expand...

assad never used chemical weapons

oh and saddam would still be in power if he listened to the economic jackals, instead they overthrew him, took the oil, fuled a sectarian conflict and made widespread propoganda around the USA which vilified Islam
 
MeSoNe said:
Whataboutism. The US is guilty.

Such hideous crimes do not need to be measured against each other. In US for such actions in criminal court, without the excuse of being a soldier, one probably gets a death sentence. In Iraq, similarly, such crime would likely lead to a death sentence.

Do ou really think there should be a competition on who slaughtered people more/better/worse? Who tortured them better? Who committed 'better' war crimes? Are you quite serious?

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So in other words you have no actual evidence to back up your claims but you are desperate to slam the US so you are grasping at straws. Got it.

Such “hideous crimes” that you can’t even mention them huh :roll:

“Guilty” of what?

Pointing out that Saddam was far, far worse than the US is A) pointing out the obvious and B) rather important to note.
 
MeSoNe said:
I never said they are. They could be though seeing as Russia is a threat to both..

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Iran sees a lot of people as a threat but Russia dominates in Syria
 
TypicalRussian said:
assad never used chemical weapons

oh and saddam would still be in power if he listened to the economic jackals, instead they overthrew him, took the oil, fuled a sectarian conflict and made widespread propoganda around the USA which vilified Islam
Click to expand...

At the very least he was criminally irresponsible with them and allowed them to be captured.

Far more likely is that he used them....which is what every objective intelligence source has been saying this whole time

Saddam would still be in power if he hadn’t brutally invaded his neighbors and done everything in his power to make America think he was involved in 9/11.

And no, they didn’t “take the oil”. That idiotic conspiracy theory needs to die already.
 
GDViking said:
Well and n that case when will trump strike Putin???
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t want to bet on Trump in a fistfight with Putin, and it would be seen as “undiplomatic”....so probably not anytime soon :mrgreen::roll:
 
TypicalRussian said:
assad never used chemical weapons
Click to expand...
Then why did the kids suffocate? Who done it? Reportedly Assad with chemical weapons. The fact that he has tortured tens of thousands of prisoners isn't exactly a sign that empathy would prevent him from murdering children.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
MeSoNe said:
Then why did the kids suffocate? Who done it? Reportedly Assad with chemical weapons. The fact that he has tortured tens of thousands of prisoners isn't exactly a sign that empathy would prevent him from murdering children.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

the syrian rebels did it
 
Tigerace117 said:
So in other words you have no actual evidence to back up your claims but you are desperate to slam the US so you are grasping at straws. Got it.

Such “hideous crimes” that you can’t even mention them huh :roll:

“Guilty” of what?

Pointing out that Saddam was far, far worse than the US is A) pointing out the obvious and B) rather important to note.
Click to expand...
You're just pretending to be stupid because you're ashamed of what US has done. The whole world knows. It's written into history as a fact. Denying it is like being a flat earther.

The attitude is disgusting that just because other people have done wrong you can do whatever. Revolting. Such people make me sick.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
TypicalRussian said:
Iran sees a lot of people as a threat but Russia dominates in Syria
Click to expand...
Yes, but when one is a bigger than than another you can compromise and take the smaller threat. Syria has little to do with it.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
Tigerace117 said:
At the very least he was criminally irresponsible with them and allowed them to be captured.

Far more likely is that he used them....which is what every objective intelligence source has been saying this whole time

Saddam would still be in power if he hadn’t brutally invaded his neighbors and done everything in his power to make America think he was involved in 9/11.

And no, they didn’t “take the oil”. That idiotic conspiracy theory needs to die already.
Click to expand...

no he was not responsible, all evidence points to the rebels doing it

its not idiotic, trump conformed it

Trump Said '''Take the Oil''' From Iraq. Can He?
 
MeSoNe said:
You're just pretending to be stupid because you're ashamed of what US has done. The whole world knows. It's written into history as a fact. Denying it is like being a flat earther.

The attitude is disgusting that just because other people have done wrong you can do whatever. Revolting. Such people make me sick.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

hes like that
 
TypicalRussian said:
the syrian rebels did it
Click to expand...
The ones "aided" by the US? That's what Putin would say. Glad every intelligent source agrees Assad/Russia did it. Lets not forget how Russia boasted of having such good planes that see the targets so clear and them went on to bomb civilians 70% of the time. Whoops.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
 
MeSoNe said:
Yes, but when one is a bigger than than another you can compromise and take the smaller threat. Syria has little to do with it.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

syria has a lot to do with it

Both iran and russia are pro assad but putin(at least in the past) has shown some good relations to Israel
 
MeSoNe said:
You're just pretending to be stupid because you're ashamed of what US has done. The whole world knows. It's written into history as a fact. Denying it is like being a flat earther.

The attitude is disgusting that just because other people have done wrong you can do whatever. Revolting. Such people make me sick.

Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Again, you haven’t been able to actually cite anything the US supposedly did that was even remotely close to Saddam’s atrocities....mostly because you can’t.

Meaningless vague buzz words like “the whole world knows” and “flat earthers” don’t change the facts.

Either support your argument or face facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom