- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 55,599
- Reaction score
- 40,005
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
No, but the idea that southern villagers spontaneously formed guerilla armies to fight on behalf of Uncle Ho's revolutionaries is propaganda. If you were a rice farmer in Quang Nam Province (I Corps) for instance, you didn't really have a choice whether or not to join the VC. The local province chief (working for the NVA) would make sure of that.
The average rice farmer likely never even considered politics or resistance. He just wanted to plant his paddies, smoke his pipe, and live peacefully with his wife and kids.
All communist revolutions try to project the illusion of broad grass roots support for their objectives. It is all smoke and mirrors.
Nice spin.
The NVA were in the south to support the communist uprising there. The commies were fighting the government before the first NVA set foot there.
What's the point of changing history? Does it sit better with you to say it was the north invading and defeating the south? Fine then, have it, but that's not what happened. What happened was a violent reaction by a population who'd endured generations, hundreds of years, of oppression by foreigners. That's how extremists are made. You watch, though, they've got their own country now and they're doing pretty well with it. My son toured the area a couple years ago and he says the people are all doing well and there's small capitalism everywhere you go. Vietnam will be a democracy in my son's lifetime and they will have done it themselves instead of having it imposed on them.
Vietnam, when it's all said and done, once they've grown out of communism, will be an example of a people making a success of one-sided resistance to overwhelming foreign power.