• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is wrong with the Iran deal?

Red_Dave

Libertarian socialist
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
6,923
Reaction score
1,738
Location
Staffs, England
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Step one: The United States nukes a country

Step two: Following the Cuban missile crisis, on the initiative of the U.S, most of the world signs the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), agreeing that


(A)those with nuclear weapons reduce their stockpiles with a few to eventually phasing them out altogether

(B) Nuclear weapons states do not assist non-nuclear states in attaining weapons and push those outside the treaty into membership

(C) Non-nuclear states are free to develop peaceful nuclear energy under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Authority.

Step Three: The U.S does none of those things, stockpiles increase, Israel is placed under no pressure to sign the treaty, and India enjoys assistance from the Bush presidency in its nuclear weapons program.

Step 4: After years of threats and tensions Iran is eventually pushed into agreeing to inspections and controls of its nuclear energy that go above and beyond those stipulated in the NPT.

Step 5: Americans somehow feel they are getting the raw end of the deal. Which naturally begs the question; Why complain when you have got away with a deal that no other country on earth could get away with?
 
Step one: The United States nukes a country

Step two: Following the Cuban missile crisis, on the initiative of the U.S, most of the world signs the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), agreeing that


(A)those with nuclear weapons reduce their stockpiles with a few to eventually phasing them out altogether

(B) Nuclear weapons states do not assist non-nuclear states in attaining weapons and push those outside the treaty into membership

(C) Non-nuclear states are free to develop peaceful nuclear energy under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Authority.

Step Three: The U.S does none of those things, stockpiles increase, Israel is placed under no pressure to sign the treaty, and India enjoys assistance from the Bush presidency in its nuclear weapons program.

Step 4: After years of threats and tensions Iran is eventually pushed into agreeing to inspections and controls of its nuclear energy that go above and beyond those stipulated in the NPT.

Step 5: Americans somehow feel they are getting the raw end of the deal. Which naturally begs the question; Why complain when you have got away with a deal that no other country on earth could get away with?

What are you talking about? That just too thin.
 
Step one: The United States nukes a country

Step two: Following the Cuban missile crisis, on the initiative of the U.S, most of the world signs the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), agreeing that


(A)those with nuclear weapons reduce their stockpiles with a few to eventually phasing them out altogether

(B) Nuclear weapons states do not assist non-nuclear states in attaining weapons and push those outside the treaty into membership

(C) Non-nuclear states are free to develop peaceful nuclear energy under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Authority.

Step Three: The U.S does none of those things, stockpiles increase, Israel is placed under no pressure to sign the treaty, and India enjoys assistance from the Bush presidency in its nuclear weapons program.

Step 4: After years of threats and tensions Iran is eventually pushed into agreeing to inspections and controls of its nuclear energy that go above and beyond those stipulated in the NPT.

Step 5: Americans somehow feel they are getting the raw end of the deal. Which naturally begs the question; Why complain when you have got away with a deal that no other country on earth could get away with?

Please................... do your research before posting nonsense.

US_Nuclear_Weapons_Stockpile_765_1.JPG
 
Step one: The United States nukes a country

Step two: Following the Cuban missile crisis, on the initiative of the U.S, most of the world signs the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), agreeing that


(A)those with nuclear weapons reduce their stockpiles with a few to eventually phasing them out altogether

(B) Nuclear weapons states do not assist non-nuclear states in attaining weapons and push those outside the treaty into membership

(C) Non-nuclear states are free to develop peaceful nuclear energy under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Authority.

Step Three: The U.S does none of those things, stockpiles increase, Israel is placed under no pressure to sign the treaty, and India enjoys assistance from the Bush presidency in its nuclear weapons program.

Step 4: After years of threats and tensions Iran is eventually pushed into agreeing to inspections and controls of its nuclear energy that go above and beyond those stipulated in the NPT.

Step 5: Americans somehow feel they are getting the raw end of the deal. Which naturally begs the question; Why complain when you have got away with a deal that no other country on earth could get away with?

I have often wondered why the "reds" have maintained there enemies, though, it was not them that were wrong.
 
Please................... do your research before posting nonsense.

View attachment 67213210

I stand corrected! still would you not agree that support for India and Israel still leaves the U.S in violation of this treaty? Given that the goal (and legal obligation) is complete ellimination (and it has been over 40 years).
 
Last edited:
An indication of what you want?

The details of what people feel is lacking in the treaty. In light of Trumps threat to tear it up, the ban on Iranians entering the U.S etc.
 
The details of what people feel is lacking in the treaty. In light of Trumps threat to tear it up, the ban on Iranians entering the U.S etc.

I am really not sure, what you arevthinking.
 
Back
Top Bottom