On the evidence available, Israel attacked and killed in Gaza, blaming them for an incident they have no evidence of them being to blame for and, Ido this is not my personal view as you want to pretend I have given you plenty of links to support it. None of which you have refuted
Would you please stop laundering words? This wasn't an "incident" this was a premeditated terrorist attack, a ****en Anti Tank missile blow up two couples coming back from a vacation in Eilat following by a gunman who shot them from point blank range, a suicide bomber blew himself up on a bus killing the bus driver and another gunman ambushed another couple coming back from Eilat killing the husband while his wife hears him gurgling as he dies and she can't help because she plays dead for 45 minutes as she fear the gunman will finish her off. This is your "incident"...
As for evidence, you keep refering to evidence available, as I already explained but you wish to keep living in your fantasy world, not all of the evidence is available to you, and I do not think the IDF intelegence has to give up their informants for the sake of Alexa's approval.
and Gaza civilians are killed regularly trying to go about their daily life and earn a living. This is not a one sided affair.
YOU are the one who is making it look as if it was one sided, remember??? YOU said Israel attacked first! Now when you are confronted with reality you say its not a one sided affair???
You must not have noticed. I did not see the rocket launches as a good idea. I understand the first Israeli strike on Gaza killed an infant of two
Good idea??? Alexa, this is not a "good idea" and not even a "bad idea" this is an act of terror, this is a murderous act designed to implement fear in the hearts of civilian population! stop with this word laundary!!! You put on the scale attacks targeting civilian populations on one side and surgical strikes aimed at terrorists on the other and in your weird univers they are moraly equivalent. You try to excuse terrorisem, there is no excuse for terrorisem, none what so ever. But again, nothing will supprise me from someone who compared Gaza to Nazi Ghettos.
Again, my opinion was that restraint was the best course of action. However it is completely predictable that their would be rocket attack from Gaza and you are using a double standard here. You see your right to attack, even without evidence, but do not see the right of the people of Gaza to fight back when their children are killed. I never approve of unnecessary killing.
Even without evidence??? What are those metal tubes falling from the sky terrorising the people of southern Israel? Candy canes ???
The people of Gaza has every right to fight back, they are not fighting, they are targeting civilians, Beer Sheva is not a legitimate target to fight back, a head of a terrorist group is, an IDF outpost is, but when they do launch an attack on an IDF unit it usually ends up with dead terrorists so... they go back to doing what they do best, terrorise ordinary citizens
Not everyone is as pacifist as me.
ROFL
If you go bombing people within an hour of an attack when you have no evidence they did it, just because you 'thought' they were going to engage in terrorist activity, and you kill people who had nothing to do with this including children, for that, not the first attack, but for retaliation after Gaza is attacked, Israel is responsible.
I see what you are doing there, war of atteration, if you say something long enough, people will finally give up correcting you.
Israel knew of the PRC intent to launch the attack from Sinai BEFORE the attack took place. I believe it is the 2nd time I note this.
The attack on the PRC high command didn't kill any civilians.
Israel can't be held resposible for terrorist activity from Gaza, Israel can be held responsible only for legitimate retaliation from Gaza.
I advise everyone to get back on-topic or there will be consequences.