It's not that Demokrats are against unknown threats, the Black Swan events that only become known in hindsight (like 911)... like, how could somebody do that, on so many levels?
It is difficult to defend against unknown unknowns.
Nope, Demokrats are against protecting the nation against future known threats. Things that have happened in San Bernardino, Paris, London, Istanbul, Berlin, Nice, Madrid, Ohio State University... and on and on...
Though I enjoy the banter, tweaking the left and the laughs, it's time to use my time a little more wisely. Have too much to do, and DP has become a luxury I can't afford. Sticking around during the primaries and general election would act like a black hole, sucking time in large chunks.
My 2012 Prediction:
Of course... Obama's going to go the way of Carter, I hope he gets beaten like Mondale, but that type of drubbing isn't likely. I think he'll lose by about the same margin
Once again, for the forth time... answer the question in bold. I don't want to know anything about the Constitution per se, I do want to know your defense of yourQuote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
So what? Those who control the most wealth should pay the most. This is not rocket science. At least to most of us who know the difference between the words TO and TOO.