• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Man dies but lives... did he serve his life sentence?

Bodi

Just waiting for my set...
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
123,703
Reaction score
28,003
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
It's a silly argument that ignores the plain intent of laws imposing life sentences.

If you "die" but are brought back, you are once more alive. It's still the you that was sentenced.
 
It's a silly argument that ignores the plain intent of laws imposing life sentences.

If you "die" but are brought back, you are once more alive. It's still the you that was sentenced.

It is an amusing argument but what does the guy have to lose? At least an article was written about it.
 
Murderer who briefly 'died' in hospital goes to court to claim he's served his life sentence | US News | Sky News

Man dies but lives... did he serve his life sentence?

[FONT="]A man serving life for murder claims he has served his sentence because he "died" during a medical emergency.[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#4A4A4A][FONT="]A court has denied his request to be released, because if he can make such a plea, he must still be alive.[/FONT]

:lamo This is you, right bod? I only ask, because the only person I know that would attempt a troll like this is you. Please stop murdering people, Bod... :lol:
 
What legal representation did he get?
 
I guess a question would be even if he were freed, would he have any rights.
Social security, no the person with that number died!
any property he might have owned, no the person who held that title died!
He would truly be a non person, even his citizenship would be non existent.
I do not see how he could split the hair, he is ether legally dead, or he is not.
 
Hmm... not many go to court to present their own death certificate. ;)
 
It reminds me of the legal theory in the movie double jeopardy which was totally wrong
 
:lamo This is you, right bod? I only ask, because the only person I know that would attempt a troll like this is you. Please stop murdering people, Bod... :lol:

But did he serve his "life sentence"? He was in prison until he died, after all.
 
It reminds me of the legal theory in the movie double jeopardy which was totally wrong

Yeah, that movie bugged me because of that... I tried explaining the error to a couple who loved it and thought it was so clever... I am not sure that they believed me.
 
Murderer who briefly 'died' in hospital goes to court to claim he's served his life sentence | US News | Sky News

Man dies but lives... did he serve his life sentence?

[FONT="]A man serving life for murder claims he has served his sentence because he "died" during a medical emergency.[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#4A4A4A][FONT="]A court has denied his request to be released, because if he can make such a plea, he must still be alive.[/FONT]

He didn't die. Doctors erroneously pronounced him dead.
 
It's a silly argument that ignores the plain intent of laws imposing life sentences.

If you "die" but are brought back, you are once more alive. It's still the you that was sentenced.

And if, as a result, you got amnesia or some kind of brain damage, resulting in loss of identity and memories?
 
Murderer who briefly 'died' in hospital goes to court to claim he's served his life sentence | US News | Sky News

Man dies but lives... did he serve his life sentence?

[FONT="]A man serving life for murder claims he has served his sentence because he "died" during a medical emergency.[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#4A4A4A][FONT="]A court has denied his request to be released, because if he can make such a plea, he must still be alive.[/FONT]

Why waking up in a morgue isn’t quite as unusual as you’d think | Carla Valentine | Opinion | The Guardian
 
How was it wrong? I'm curious.

She presumes she cannot be prosecuted for murdering her ex husband because she was already wrongfully convicted for his murder.

It is wrong because the first murder was a totally different “crime” then if she commits the real murder.
 
She presumes she cannot be prosecuted for murdering her ex husband because she was already wrongfully convicted for his murder.

It is wrong because the first murder was a totally different “crime” then if she commits the real murder.

That's what I figured. But double jeopardy applies to the SAME crime. I.e. the same charge with the same victim, legally. The only way to charge her is to charge her with lesser crime.
 
She presumes she cannot be prosecuted for murdering her ex husband because she was already wrongfully convicted for his murder.

It is wrong because the first murder was a totally different “crime” then if she commits the real murder.

Oh I think I remember now. It was self-defense. So it's moot.
 
And if, as a result, you got amnesia or some kind of brain damage, resulting in loss of identity and memories?

Prisons tend not to give too much of a **** about mentally ill (whether it's a disease or brain damage as you mention) inmates. Something like 50% of inmates are, on average. I suppose if it were bad enough they'd just transfer the guy to a prison hospital, but they wouldn't let him go. I suppose he could beg the governor for some sort of compassionate commutation/pardon, but if it was that bad he'd still end up in a hospital of some sort.
 
Prisons tend not to give too much of a **** about mentally ill (whether it's a disease or brain damage as you mention) inmates. Something like 50% of inmates are, on average. I suppose if it were bad enough they'd just transfer the guy to a prison hospital, but they wouldn't let him go. I suppose he could beg the governor for some sort of compassionate commutation/pardon, but if it was that bad he'd still end up in a hospital of some sort.

You were talking about personal identity. You are still you after you're back to life. With amnesia or brain damage, you are no longer you. There's legal precedence of such thing, especially when a crime was committed in a drunken stupor.
 
Prisons tend not to give too much of a **** about mentally ill (whether it's a disease or brain damage as you mention) inmates. Something like 50% of inmates are, on average. I suppose if it were bad enough they'd just transfer the guy to a prison hospital, but they wouldn't let him go. I suppose he could beg the governor for some sort of compassionate commutation/pardon, but if it was that bad he'd still end up in a hospital of some sort.


Well I mean, defense attorneys for 50% of prisoners claim they’re mentally Ill and professionals who diagnose that kind of thing are just paid prostitutes. If you want mental illness you can have it.
 
That's what I figured. But double jeopardy applies to the SAME crime. I.e. the same charge with the same victim, legally. The only way to charge her is to charge her with lesser crime.

It wouldn’t be the same crime.

It would involve the same victim, but it would’ve occured in different dates, under different circumstances, etc. Plus the first conviction would’ve been vacated anyway.
 
It wouldn’t be the same crime.

It would involve the same victim, but it would’ve occured in different dates, under different circumstances, etc. Plus the first conviction would’ve been vacated anyway.

Hmm. Good point about the conviction being vacated. But then again there's the problem of already SERVING the sentence.
 
He didn't die. Doctors erroneously pronounced him dead.

If doctors pronounced him dead it is because he died...
 
Back
Top Bottom