• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Isn't discrimination against cops evil?

Yep. That's the nature of default states. They don't require a choice to be in it, but do require a choice to be out of it.

Wow.

Who would choose to be a demonized minority?
 
Yep. That's the nature of default states. They don't require a choice to be in it, but do require a choice to be out of it.

You didn't choose to be hetero, you chose to not choose to be gay? So, you could be gay but you choose not to be? Bottom line, you could?

What helped you resist choosing to be gay?

Sorry for so many questions, it's fascinating.
 
Last edited:
You didn't choose to be hetero, you chose to not choose to be gay? So, you could be gay but you choose not to be?

I could choose to go blow some guy or get banged in the ass if I wanted, sure. I just don't.
 
Sadists, attention whores, perpetual victims, desperate people that can't get laid by the opposite sex, mentally ill, etc.

Wow.

Anyone? Lil' help?
 
I could choose to go blow some guy or get banged in the ass if I wanted, sure. I just don't.

Would it depend more on his looks or money?
 
But you could be?

I'm an adult, and make appropriate and healthy life choices that don't lead to the maladapted psychological states listed, so it's not likely. Now, it's possible for people to be subjected to bad environments that lead to those states, especially younger people as they have less control over their lives. You could argue that removes an amount of "choice" from the picture. But, that still doesn't mean they were born that way. My argument is that it's an environmental issue. Nurture, not nature.
 
I'm an adult, and make appropriate and healthy life choices that don't lead to the maladapted psychological states listed, so it's not likely. Now, it's possible for people to be subjected to bad environments that lead to those states, especially younger people as they have less control over their lives. You could argue that removes an amount of "choice" from the picture. But, that still doesn't mean they were born that way. My argument is that it's an environmental issue. Nurture, not nature.

You could be attracted to men?
 
Not some, all. Every cop agrees to enforce mala prohibita laws, which is immoral.
How is it immoral?
Even their assumption of authority over all others in enforcement of mala in se laws is immoral. Further elucidation...

It's not an assumption. Society elected people like the sheriff or elect people who appoint police chiefs to protect the communkty and enforce the laws the society agreed to. The police's power comes from us.
When a "bad guy" does it:..............When your government does it:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbery.......................................Taxing
Kidnapping...................................Arresting
Breaking and entering....................Executing a warrant
Burglary.......................................Seizure
Assault.........................................Enforcing compliance
Sexually assault............................Search
Take hostage................................Incarcerate
Trespass......................................Investigate
Terroristic Threatening...................Warning

False equivalency is false. Why can a doctor cut you open with a knife but some stranger can't?

Let's suppose someone murdered your loved one. No one knows who did it. In order to find out who did it, someone must investigate the crime scene. Then, once enough evidence is gathered to pinpoint a suspect, a warrant is issued for the suspect's arrest. Once they find him, they may need to kick in a door or stop a vehicle to prevent escape. If the suspect resist, then use of force is authorized. Once in handcuffs, the suspect need to face trial to answer for his crime. In the mean time, they can't let a potential killer on the streets so they keep him in jail.
 
I have concluded homosexuals don't care who the hell they try to have sex with.

LOL, women concluded that about most men, period, a long long time ago. :lamo :lamo
 
Refusing to comply to a traffic violation is not the equivalent of committing murder. Your equivocation is what is very telling. Killing someone who has not initiated violence is the equivalent of murder. That's what cops do to those who refuse to comply.

You don't get to pick and choose what laws to obey based own your own personal feelings. Society is not all about you; stop being such a narcissist.

No, cops kill people who try and kill them first. Lots of your ilk are happy to "initiate violence" to avoid being "kidnapped" for violating the law.
 
You don't get to pick and choose what laws to obey based own your own personal feelings. Society is not all about you; stop being such a narcissist.

No, cops kill people who try and kill them first. Lots of your ilk are happy to "initiate violence" to avoid being "kidnapped" for violating the law.

No one initiates violence to avoid being kidnapped. The kidnapper initiates.
 
No one initiates violence to avoid being kidnapped. The kidnapper initiates.

It isn't kidnapping. You broke the law. The punishment is being arrested and put in jail/prison.
 
No one initiates violence to avoid being kidnapped. The kidnapper initiates.

Literally tens of thousands of people have committed violence to avoid going to haul for their crimes over the years:
 
Political agitators vehemently protest against public disrespect for homosexuals . Where is the vehement protests against public displays of disrespect for cops?

No, its not evil. People are quite free to express their dislike of LEOs so long as it does not involve doing anything illegal, like assault, riots, etc etc. If you want to flip a cop off then by all means do it. If you want to assault a cop then I hope you get your ass handed to you by being thrown in jail.
 
Political agitators vehemently protest against public disrespect for homosexuals . Where is the vehement protests against public displays of disrespect for cops?

You don't choose to be gay, you choose to be a cop. And also, **** cops. **** their drug war. And **** anyone that thinks they protect a goddamn thing other than the for profit prison systems interests.

**** the system, I'm ready for anarchy.
 
No, its not evil. People are quite free to express their dislike of LEOs so long as it does not involve doing anything illegal, like assault, riots, etc etc. If you want to flip a cop off then by all means do it. If you want to assault a cop then I hope you get your ass handed to you by being thrown in jail.

Democrats seem to think getting in the faces of conservatives or attacking their wives at home alone is the best way to show anger toward conservatives and republicans. When they get a republican down they kick him for good measure. Democrats don't know God which explains why they are so uncivilized.

Michael Brown was a stupid kid. Stupid because he had been brought up to believe assaulting cops is something heroes do in that culture. Poor Michael. he did not know better.
 
You don't choose to be gay, you choose to be a cop. And also, **** cops. **** their drug war. And **** anyone that thinks they protect a goddamn thing other than the for profit prison systems interests.

**** the system, I'm ready for anarchy.

Is that you Mr. Ayers?
 
Back
Top Bottom