- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Not that that they will respond, but here is a thread if they choose to.As I said, if you want to rehash Martin/Zimmerman......start your own thread.
There is no validity to your take.I still say that zimmerman was a bad shoot.
The reason is this.
Zimmerman was following someone. That person had no idea who he was and zimmerman failed to follow any kind of procedure as identifying himself.
I have been in plenty of cities when traveling and not all of them are nice area's. I very much watch out for anyone and everyone walking.
If someone is following me or running after me you bet i consider them a threat and i am going to defend myself.
Zimmerman to me is the aggressor in this situation therefore he should have been charged with murder.
causing an incident and then start losing said incident doesn't mean you get to shoot someone.
This is more of a toss up. The guy assaulted him for no reason. If there is a video it will very much play into whether or not
the guy that attacked him is a threat and the AG will go off of that.
1. Following for legitimate purpose as Zimmerman did is not a valid reason to attack him, and does not make Zimmerman the aggressor.
2. Secondly, Zimmerman was no longer following him at that point when Trayvon came out from Zimmerman's rear left, mind you, on Zimmerman return path.
So Trayvon came out from a safe place to attack. That is Trayvon being the aggressor.
1. No matter how many times you say it, trying to keep an eye on a suspect so you can identify them to police, is not called pursuit.while still being pursued by someone he did not know.
maybe he couldn't get home.
there is also the fact that zimmerman disobeyed a direct order by police not to engage and follow the person.
anyone following me is a threat period. more so if they do not identify themselves and who they are.
by them being a threat i have a right to defend myself if needed if they continue to pursue me.
doesn't matter if he lost sight of him or not.
if someone is following me i am going to try and lose them. if i can't lose them then i am going to defend myself.
2. Zimmerman did not disobey a direct order. That is a completely foolish claim and just shows you know not of what you speak.
a. The call taker told Zimmerman that they did not need him to do that. That is not an order, but a request.
b. That call taker had no authority to give any order, and even if they had been a police Officer no order could be given as they are not on scene and in control. Not to mention an order can create a liability unlike a suggestion for a persons own safety.
3. Zimmerman, to his credit, did indeed follow the suggestion and stopped following. He went East when Trayvon had gone South.b. That call taker had no authority to give any order, and even if they had been a police Officer no order could be given as they are not on scene and in control. Not to mention an order can create a liability unlike a suggestion for a persons own safety.
4. And again. Zimmerman passed by the area and Trayvon was nowhere to be seen. He only came out after Zimmerman was returning through the area and came from Zimmerman's left rear. Not only is that leaving the safety of your position to confront/attack but suggests that he laid in wait.
The whole incident? No.Did anyone witness the confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin and the actual shooting?
In parts? Yes. And of what they relayed they saw and/or heard was consistent with what Zimmerman reported.