• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

POTUS Cannot Be Idicted

cuban smokes said:
haha, well you sure look like you didn't do your homework ............. I would go further but you're not worth points ..........

923. 18 U.S.C. § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States

https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us
Click to expand...

If you want to go this route, perhaps you...and everyone like you...should be more precise in your rhetoric and stop mentioning "collusion".

In any case, if this is what you want to hang your "get Trump" dreams on, I'm thinking you'll be having a hard time getting it done.

The operative language is the so-called "defraud clause," that prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States. This clause creates a separate offense from the "offense clause" in Section 371. Both offenses require the traditional elements of Section 371 conspiracy, including an illegal agreement, criminal intent, and proof of an overt act.
Click to expand...

Nothing I've seen comes near to satisfying these requirements.
 
Mycroft said:
If you want to go this route, perhaps you...and everyone like you...should be more precise in your rhetoric and stop mentioning "collusion".

In any case, if this is what you want to hang your "get Trump" dreams on, I'm thinking you'll be having a hard time getting it done.



Nothing I've seen comes near to satisfying these requirements.
Click to expand...


personally, I have never utilized the verbiage 'collusion'

AFA your last statement is concerned, there is an ongoing SC investigation that has yet to be completed.
 
cuban smokes said:
personally, I have never utilized the verbiage 'collusion'

AFA your last statement is concerned, there is an ongoing SC investigation that has yet to be completed.
Click to expand...

Point accepted about your rhetoric.

I think enough has been leaked about Mueller's investigation and enough of his own actions have been seen to safely say he has nothing that applies to the conspiracy you mention.
 
American said:
You were nowhere when Obama signed a millions EO's doing whatever he wanted. Trump has had to spend too much time undoing all that bull****. If Obama had gotten laws passed, like he was supposed to, he'd have a legacy.
Click to expand...

EOs have long been constitutional. You may not have liked them, but they were not illegal. and with obstructionists Republicans who wouldn't even bring a vote to the floor there was no other choice. Republicans hated that a black man was president. Trump has just verified that everyone was correct that Republicans hated a black man in power. It't why Trump is so quick to insult just about everyone EXCEPT White Supremacists.
 
Mycroft said:
Point accepted about your rhetoric.

I think enough has been leaked about Mueller's investigation and enough of his own actions have been seen to safely say he has nothing that applies to the conspiracy you mention.
Click to expand...

if the SC investigation is allowed to be completed then we will know, one way, or the other ........
 
cuban smokes said:
if the SC investigation is allowed to be completed then we will know, one way, or the other ........
Click to expand...

Don't worry. Mueller's investigation will be allowed to be completed.

(Unless, of course, we find out there was no need for the investigation in the first place. Then it might be dumped before it's completed.)
 
Praxas said:
EOs have long been constitutional. You may not have liked them, but they were not illegal. and with obstructionists Republicans who wouldn't even bring a vote to the floor there was no other choice. Republicans hated that a black man was president. Trump has just verified that everyone was correct that Republicans hated a black man in power. It't why Trump is so quick to insult just about everyone EXCEPT White Supremacists.
Click to expand...

This is where your post goes into absurdity. The fact that you're still pushing this nonsense, says more about you than anything else. This didn't stick then, and it doesn't stick now. The legality of EO's isn't the issue, it's their permanence and ethics that matter. Obama refused to work with the Republicans at all. He's a fanatical ideologue.
 
Mycroft said:
Don't worry. Mueller's investigation will be allowed to be completed.

(Unless, of course, we find out there was no need for the investigation in the first place. Then it might be dumped before it's completed.)
Click to expand...

Is that you Donald?
 
will it not be possible to prosecute him if he looses the presidency in 2020?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom