• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What’s It All About, Ralphie?

Flanders

Member
Joined
May 1, 2018
Messages
173
Reaction score
17
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Big:

426861.jpg

Last year, BMW issued a recall for 36,410 vehicles in the UK over a safety issue where an electrical fault could potentially lead to a complete power loss. However, BMW clearly underestimated the scale of the issue because an investigation by the BBC Watchdog has prompted the automaker to extend the recall to 310,000 cars. "We now recognize that there may have been some cases of similar power supply issues in vehicles not covered by the original recall,” BMW said in response to the investigation.​

Yesterday by Martin Bigg
BMW Recalls 300,000 Cars Over Electrical Fault

https://carbuzz.com/news/bmw-recalls-300-000-cars-over-electrical-fault

and small:

2011_smart_fortwo_convertible_passion-cabriolet_s_oem_1_500.jpg

German luxury automobile manufacturer Mercedes-Benz is recalling almost 43,000 Smart cars in the U.S. market, because of a potential risk of fire in the engine compartment.​

Almost 43,000 Smart Cars Recalled by Mercedes-Benz in the U.S.
By George KuruvillaMay 12, 2018

Almost 43,000 Smart Cars Recalled by Mercedes-Benz in the US - The Drive



What was it all about, Ralphie? It was all about the Chevrolet Corvair:



50 Years Ago, ‘Unsafe at Any Speed’ Shook the Auto World
By Christopher Jensen
Nov. 26, 2015

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/...unsafe-at-any-speed-shook-the-auto-world.html
 
this is a debate site....you post a topic, WITH YOUR THOUGHTS....

not just videos, and pictures

and then people get an idea on what YOU want to discuss
 
Big:

426861.jpg

Last year, BMW issued a recall for 36,410 vehicles in the UK over a safety issue where an electrical fault could potentially lead to a complete power loss. However, BMW clearly underestimated the scale of the issue because an investigation by the BBC Watchdog has prompted the automaker to extend the recall to 310,000 cars. "We now recognize that there may have been some cases of similar power supply issues in vehicles not covered by the original recall,” BMW said in response to the investigation.​

Yesterday by Martin Bigg
BMW Recalls 300,000 Cars Over Electrical Fault

https://carbuzz.com/news/bmw-recalls-300-000-cars-over-electrical-fault

and small:


German luxury automobile manufacturer Mercedes-Benz is recalling almost 43,000 Smart cars in the U.S. market, because of a potential risk of fire in the engine compartment.​

Almost 43,000 Smart Cars Recalled by Mercedes-Benz in the U.S.
By George KuruvillaMay 12, 2018

Almost 43,000 Smart Cars Recalled by Mercedes-Benz in the US - The Drive



What was it all about, Ralphie? It was all about the Chevrolet Corvair:



50 Years Ago, ‘Unsafe at Any Speed’ Shook the Auto World
By Christopher Jensen
Nov. 26, 2015

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/...unsafe-at-any-speed-shook-the-auto-world.html


Posted in wrong forum.
 
Posted in wrong forum. This is not a car forum.


To Bodhisattva:
It is about consumer protection laws. Had it been about dangerous toothpaste from China you would have said it belongs in the toothpaste forum.
 


To Bodhisattva:
It is about consumer protection laws. Had it been about dangerous toothpaste from China you would have said it belongs in the toothpaste forum.

When you quote a person it is obvious that you are responding to that person. No need for the bold red To blah blah
 
When you quote a person it is obvious that you are responding to that person. No need for the bold red To blah blah

To Bodhisattva: You might want to put me on your Ignore List since I have no intention of changing my format to please you.
 
To Bodhisattva:[/COLORu might want to put me on your Ignore List since I have no intention of changing my format to ease ]
you ant to lose?

You are admitting that you w


Looks ŕ...
 
you ant to lose?

You are admitting that you w


Looks ŕ...

To Bodhisattva: I have sympathy for anyone who is tongue-tied, but I never heard of anyone who was tongue-tied in print. Pull yourself together and try to make your replies understandable.
 
To Bodhisattva: I have sympathy for anyone who is tongue-tied, but I never heard of anyone who was tongue-tied in print. Pull yourself together and try to make your replies understandable.

You can't understand that?
 
To Bodhisattva: You might want to put me on your Ignore List since I have no intention of changing my format to please you.

You apparently also don't care about posting coherently. You're on the second page of your own thread and you still haven't said anything about your original post.
Question is, what the hell are you on about here? Are you able to put a thought into language?
 
Back
Top Bottom