• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Paris 1971 - NYC 2018 - Part 2

Flanders

Member
Joined
May 1, 2018
Messages
173
Reaction score
17
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Kerry not only got away with treason he eventually settled down in that nest of Democrat traitors for 27 years —— the U.S. Senate. Not content to continue working against his country in the Senate he succeeded in getting the Democrat party’s nomination for president in 2004. Failing to win the presidential election he angled his way into the secretary of state job. John Kerry’s tenure as secretary of state should forever remind Americans of how close a traitor came to the presidency?

. . . Kerry himself acknowledged that his visit to Paris was “on the borderline” of legality. Actually, it extended far beyond that “borderline.” A federal law known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice prescribed severe punishment (including, in some cases, the death penalty) for any person who “without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly.”

During the ensuing months, Kerry, with increasing stridency, continued to exhort the U.S. to accept the Viet Cong peace proposals. His radical VVAW comrades went so far as to sign a “People’s Peace Treaty,” whose nine points were all extracted from a list of Viet Cong conditions for ending the war. Kerry fully supported this treaty.​

John Kerry: Obama’s “Perfect Choice” For Secretary of State
December 21, 2012 By John Perazzo

John Kerry: Obama's ?Perfect Choice? For Secretary of State | Frontpage Mag

Not only did Kerry’s testimony before a Senate Committee do as much to sway public opinion as did Uncle Walter he, Kerry, gave the Vietcong a political reason to prolong the war:

General No Nguyen Giap, the Supreme Commander of the Viet Minh (NVA) forces said, in a 1989 interview with CBS’s Morley Safer,

“We paid a high price, but so did you…not only in lives and material…After Tet the Americans had to back down and come to the negotiating table, because the war was not only moving into…dozens of cities and towns in South Vietnam, but also to the living rooms of Americans back home for some time. The most important result of the Tet offensive was it made you de-escalate the bombing, and it brought you to the negotiation table. It was, therefore, a victory…The war was fought on many fronts. At that time the most important one was American public opinion.” (The Vietnam War: An Encyclopedia of Quotations, Howard Langer, 2005)​

February 27, 2008
Walter Cronkite, Vietnam, and the Decline of Media Credibility
By Lee Cary

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2008/02/walter_cronkite_vietnam_and_th.html

Finally, Democrats like John Kerry, the Clintons, Joe Biden, and the rest of their crowd did fight against an unjust war in Vietnam as they still claim —— unjust in that fighting Communist expansion is unjust.

SEE PART 1
 
UPDATE

Kerry not only got away with treason he eventually settled down in that nest of Democrat traitors for 27 years —— the U.S. Senate. Not content to continue working against his country in the Senate he succeeded in getting the Democrat party’s nomination for president in 2004. Failing to win the presidential election he angled his way into the secretary of state job. John Kerry’s tenure as secretary of state should forever remind Americans of how close a traitor came to the presidency?

VIDEO ▼

Marc Thiessen on John Kerry's secret talks with Iran | On Air Videos | Fox News

Lurch will never be convicted of anything; nevertheless, charge and try him to show the world what he is.

Politicized Justice: Democrats went gaga over a little-known law they claimed an advisor to President Trump violated following the 2016 presidential campaign. Now, the shoe's on the other foot, and both the Democrats and the media that supported them have grown strangely quiet.

The law in question is the 219-year-old Logan Act, which makes it a felony for Americans to negotiate with foreign powers in an effort to undermine the U.S. in a dispute.​

Editorials
John Kerry's Freelance Diplomacy Violates U.S. Law — So Why Isn't He Prosecuted?
5/07/2018

https://www.investors.com/politics/...y-violates-u-s-law-so-why-isnt-he-prosecuted/

Incidentally, when Kerry was secretary of state the leaders in foreign countries must have despised him because diplomacy forced them to treat a man who betrayed his own country as an equal. There is no telling what Putin and Sergey Lavrov dug up in KGB files about Kerry’s activities in Paris in 1971. Take this to the bank, those Russians know more about Kerry’s treason than the American people will ever know.

I would love to know how much help Lavrov gave to the Iranians negotiating Kerry’s Nuclear Deal (TREATY).
 
John Kerry spent all his life getting things wrong. He came home from the war in Vietnam to trash as war criminals the men with whom he wore the colors.

He told a hearing of the U.S. Senate a wicked tale of calumny, how the Americans in Vietnam had “personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam.”

It was all a lie, and he knew it was a lie, dramatic, convenient and self-serving.

John Kerry’s 57 varieties of mischief
By Wesley Pruden - The Washington Times - Monday, May 7, 2018

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/7/john-kerrys-57-varieties-of-mischief/

There is no shortage of Democrats who violated the Logan Act:

Kerry, by sharp contrast, is consulting with foreign powers for the purpose of counteracting the sitting president’s policy on Iran.

This is hardly the first time Democratic grandees—including Kerry himself—have pretended to be secretaries of state when the incumbent administration had rejected their policy views. In 1985, Kerry and then-Sen. Tom Harkin traveled to Managua to meet with Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega in an explicit attempt to undermine the Reagan administration’s policy of aiding anti-communist Sandinistas. Former senator Chris Dodd and House member Peter Kostmayer, among others, were fond of sending letters to Ortega apologizing for Reagan administration policy.

Former president Jimmy Carter is still the most famous and aggressive shadow diplomat in the United States. He has inserted himself into U.S. foreign relations, uninvited, time and again since leaving office in 1981. In 2003 he met with the Japanese in order to undermine Bush administration policy on North Korea; in 1986 he met with Ortega regime officials in opposition to Reagan administration policy; and in the Middle east he has been a constant adversary to Republican administrations. One might also consider Ted Kennedy’s offer to coach Soviet officials on nuclear disarmament and to orchestrate favorable American media coverage of a (never realized) visit by Soviet premier Yuri Andropov.​

Editorial: John Kerry, Busybody
May 08, 2018 05:50 AM

https://www.weeklystandard.com/the-editors/editorial-john-kerrys-iran-deal-meddling

Every Democrat bleeding heart is a busybody. Kerry is the only provable traitor. Calling Kerry a busybody lets him off easy.

. . . Kerry himself acknowledged that his visit to Paris was “on the borderline” of legality. Actually, it extended far beyond that “borderline.” A federal law known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice prescribed severe punishment (including, in some cases, the death penalty) for any person who “without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly.”
 
Back
Top Bottom