• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Our old buddy Eric Holder in the news again

of course you do
he is a black guy
and more successful than you
 
of course you do
he is a black guy
and more successful than you

You think every thing has to do with race, race baiter you are.

Left wing default position, every one on the right is racist. :doh :roll:

When you learn this is what is costing you elections?

Idiots keep trying the same thing over, expecting different results.

You not one of those are you..... :2wave:

Better leave room in Your party for whites. They cost you dearly in 2016 when you pushed them out of your party
 
of course you do
he is a black guy
and more successful than you

Holder was found in criminal contempt with Congress. He Has done nothing but stone wall fast and furious. He helped Obama turn the DOJ into a partisan tool.

I would go after any white man who did the same. Your much more racist than I am for even bringing this into the topic..

As for success, I am that alright. 8 figure net worth is fine with me. So take that off your list as well.
 
of course you do
he is a black guy
and more successful than you

No, Holder's blackness doesn't bother him. It's his choice of political party. He committed the biggest crime of all and joined the Democrats.
 
Holder was found in criminal contempt with Congress. He Has done nothing but stone wall fast and furious. He helped Obama turn the DOJ into a partisan tool.

I would go after any white man who did the same. Your much more racist than I am for even bringing this into the topic..

As for success, I am that alright. 8 figure net worth is fine with me. So take that off your list as well.

That was a completely bastardized Congress, just like this one.

republiconmen are scared ****less of the Holder/Obama Redistricting Project, for good reason ...
 
That was a completely bastardized Congress, just like this one.

republiconmen are scared ****less of the Holder/Obama Redistricting Project, for good reason ...

Please explain why Holder is the only DOJ head to be held in contempt of criminal Congress?

Your excuse is in vain. Republicans did not have control of Congress when this all started. Try again, and fail again.

He is part of the most crooked DOJ in our history, and in fact orchestrated it from on high...
 
of course you do
he is a black guy
and more successful than you

Wow...this has to be a record for one of the dumbest and pathetically pandering posts. Congrats, you get a sticker.
 
a2a7fd61-9a24-4879-8262-854b1e5eaee2.jpg


eric " Big K.R.I.T. " holder should be held accountable with extra sanctions added on.
This dude obama has been protecting him for so long and time now to pay.
This is the usual liberal/Demo politics at its best to be worse.
 
This Holder?
The 47 IGs minced no words: “Each of us strongly supports the principle that an inspector general must have complete, unfiltered, and timely access to all information and materials available to the agency that relate to that IG’s oversight activities, without unreasonable administrative burdens. The importance of this principle, which was codified by Congress in Section 6(a)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (the IG Act), cannot be overstated. Refusing, restricting, or delaying an IG's access to documents leads to incomplete, inaccurate, or significantly delayed findings or recommendations, which in turn may prevent the agency from promptly correcting serious problems and deprive Congress of timely information regarding the agency’s performance.”
The experience of Justice Department IG Michael Horowitz is especially outrageous. In a Senate hearing in April, Horowitz said his office must go through Attorney General Eric Holder to gain access to DOJ documents and officials. Giving Holder the power to veto an IG’s access in that manner egregiously violates the 1978 law and other statutes. Obstruction like Holder’s risks “leaving the agencies insulated from scrutiny and unacceptably vulnerable to mismanagement and misconduct – the very problems that our offices were established to review and that the American people expect us to be able to address,” the IGs said in their letter to Congress.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...stigations-examiner-editorial/article/2551805
 
Back
Top Bottom