Judicial Bias, Clarification.

I have a question for the legal people.
I am trying to seek what constitutes a judge being biased. If a grade schooler punched the judge's kid not knowing it was the judge's kid and now has say some litigation the judge needs to decide on is the father of the puncher. I am beating around the bush here,

The question, Below is what a judge put in her court biography. Now lets say I am suing someone in her court with terminal cancer, do you think this judge can be fair or will she be biased.




In 2013, my husband was diagnosed with cancer. He had multiple
surgeries and extensive radiation treatment in the last four months of
that year. Then, in the summer of 2014, we were told his cancer had
returned and was not treatable. As it turned out, that tentative
diagnosis was wrong, and Michael has been cancer-free for two years.
However, I had a difficult time in the summer of 2014, when I thought
that I would lose my husband. I was quite emotional and sometimes
those emotions were apparent when I was working. In hindsight, it
would have been wise for me to stop working for a month or two while we
worked our way through that diagnosis.
Despite this personal challenge, I kept up with my caseload and my
administrative duties.

Too little information IMO. Her personal anxiety in the past does not mean she was biased (from what we know here), just that she was possibly distracted. You would need input from others who may have appeared in her court during that time period.

BakedAlaskan said:

I have a question for the legal people.
I am trying to seek what constitutes a judge being biased. If a grade schooler punched the judge's kid not knowing it was the judge's kid and now has say some litigation the judge needs to decide on is the father of the puncher. I am beating around the bush here,

The question, Below is what a judge put in her court biography. Now lets say I am suing someone in her court with terminal cancer, do you think this judge can be fair or will she be biased.




In 2013, my husband was diagnosed with cancer. He had multiple
surgeries and extensive radiation treatment in the last four months of
that year. Then, in the summer of 2014, we were told his cancer had
returned and was not treatable. As it turned out, that tentative
diagnosis was wrong, and Michael has been cancer-free for two years.
However, I had a difficult time in the summer of 2014, when I thought
that I would lose my husband. I was quite emotional and sometimes
those emotions were apparent when I was working. In hindsight, it
would have been wise for me to stop working for a month or two while we
worked our way through that diagnosis.
Despite this personal challenge, I kept up with my caseload and my
administrative duties.

Click to expand...

Biased is when the judge puts personal opinion above the written law. Liberals do this by their "interpretation of words". i.e. right does not always mean right, sometimes it means left in my experience..

All law should be treated a "contract law" the words mean exactly what the say and no more and no less.

I did not want to go into great detail as I did not want to bias anyone as well. I just went through a divorce with a nasty little woman who lied repeatedly.
Quickly. My ex-had cancer was into drugs. We agreed on an amicle divorce. I set here up with money as well as paying everything the month before the divorce. Once I filed her story changed. I abandand her to die cutting off her insurance and so forth. The judge had my financial staements seeing me take care of everything before the divorce. She also saw my with recieved medicare and medicaid. The wife emailed my work staing I abandonded her as well. Keep in mind, my finacial statements even after I filed showed my paying for everything including $150 weekly, which came to an end when she faied to return premarital property. She was given 30k of marital property.
The judge mediated, I was to get my premarital property back, and she was to take a car I cosigned for her and put it in her name taking over loan or selling car. In return, again she would keep the 30K in marital property.
My premarital property came back busted, the car was just dumped at the bank with no notice to me, bank or the court. The car had been damged as well. I sought 2 hearings to redo our property division. WAS DENIED, BOTH TIMES. I sought have the Marital property as well as judge look into contempt of court for my ex damaging Marital property in the car and by not following court orders with the mediation. I took pictures of all the damage along with estimates. The kicker was the EX parked the car in a hadicapped space at the bank when she abandoned it and it was ticketed.
Not only did the judge deny my last request, I was ordered to pay her attoneys fees which were pro bono from the state. I was to pay her directly. I have consulted 2 attorneys as I did this divorce Pro sa, both said what the Judge has done was unprecidented and not following the law.

So now I am filing a grievence against the judge and will have to appeal.