• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Murdered for Being Pregnant, Woman Pays Ultimate Price for Dating Wrong Guy

Tigerace117 said:
Yes, it's quite funny how you have no real case and are just following me around because your precious ego has been bruised.
Click to expand...

Projection...
 
Tigerace117 said:
Gee, that's too bad buddy, considering you are constant lying about Muslims, minorities, etc---and you shill for Saddam.

Every damn thread you make adds more evidence. Your constant attempts to lump all groups of minorities in with a tiny fraction of criminals. Your shilling for a xenophobic society like Japan and your total ignorance as to the levels of violence within Japanese society, both in the present and the past. Your fantasies about Saddam, no doubt rooted in your obsessive desire for a strongman type ruler. The constant attempts to support ISIS' warped interpretation of Islam.

Frankly, pal, you might as well go hide under a rock.
Click to expand...

Just like I thought, you couldn't find one single thread, or even one solitary post where I said that minorities are thugs. Instead, you offered a thoroughly confusing mess about Japan and Saddam Hussein.....??? :blink:
 
truthatallcost said:
Just like I thought, you couldn't find one single thread, or even one solitary post where I said that minorities are thugs. Instead, you offered a thoroughly confusing mess about Japan and Saddam Hussein.....??? :blink:
Click to expand...

Just like you thought, you desperately resorted to flailing and reacted to my listing a multitude of incidents with an inane whine of "you can't list one incident" something patently and very clearly untrue.

Your support for Imperial Japan and Saddam is very relevant.
 
Lursa said:
Looks? Seriously where did you get that? Thugs are generally people who's lifestyle is focused on violence and crime. Certainly violence.

Of course someone can be evil without being a thug, let's not give Peterson any halo here. But that was not his lifestyle.
Click to expand...

OK, you made some good points. I have a question for you now;
Was Ted Bundy a thug? He killed something like 30 girls and women during his lifetime.
 
truthatallcost said:
OK, you made some good points. I have a question for you now;
Was Ted Bundy a thug? He killed something like 30 girls and women during his lifetime.
Click to expand...

No, not.
 
truthatallcost said:
Que??
Click to expand...

Just stop trying to justify your biased use of the word to color other's opinion. It's pretty obvious from the pushback that few consider it a legitimate use.

A thug appears as a thug during that lifestyle. Not clean cut, not working legitimate jobs, and with affiliations with other 'thugs.'
 
Lursa said:
Just stop trying to justify your biased use of the word to color other's opinion. It's pretty obvious from the pushback that few consider it a legitimate use.

A thug appears as a thug during that lifestyle. Not clean cut, not working legitimate jobs, and with affiliations with other 'thugs.'
Click to expand...

So Ted Bundy wasn't a thug because he kept a clean appearance? Just as I thought, you have a mental picture in mind for who is a thug and who isn't. You're guilty of what I've been accused of.
 
truthatallcost said:
So Ted Bundy wasn't a thug because he kept a clean appearance? Just as I thought, you have a mental picture in mind for who is a thug and who isn't. You're guilty of what I've been accused of.
Click to expand...

Er, no. Again cherry picking in a sad effort to 'look right on the Internets'.
 
Lursa said:
Er, no. Again cherry picking in a sad effort to 'look right on the Internets'.
Click to expand...

What about Charlie Manson? Thug or not? He wasn't as dapper or polished as Bundy, so I'm guessing you'll say thug.
 
truthatallcost said:
What about Charlie Manson? Thug or not? He wasn't as dapper or polished as Bundy, so I'm guessing you'll say thug.
Click to expand...

No, he was a manipulator who thrived on power. He shared many qualities with Jim Jones. Was the Rev Jim Jones a thug?

Edit: You know what? For your own perspective, your definition seems to work. Keeping things very simple and reduced to their most basic, with no nuance leading to deeper understanding, seems to work for you.

You may own "thug" and all it entails...to you.
 
Lursa said:
No, he was a manipulator who thrived on power. He shared many qualities with Jim Jones. Was the Rev Jim Jones a thug?
Click to expand...

Manson was in and out of prison multiple times before creating the Manson Family cult. His prior convictions included armed robbery and forcible rape at knifepoint. How the hell was that guy not a thug?

Edit: You know what? For your own perspective, your definition seems to work. Keeping things very simple and reduced to their most basic, with no nuance leading to deeper understanding, seems to work for you.

You may own "thug" and all it entails...to you.
Click to expand...

I think your definition is far simpler than mine. As far as I can gather, anyone who is white isn't a thug to you, even if they've committed every kind of violent crime in the book.
 
truthatallcost said:
Manson was in and out of prison multiple times before creating the Manson Family cult. His prior convictions included armed robbery and forcible rape at knifepoint. How the hell was that guy not a thug?



I think your definition is far simpler than mine. As far as I can gather, anyone who is white isn't a thug to you, even if they've committed every kind of violent crime in the book.
Click to expand...

Your inferences for my post are all incorrect. But carry on...I agree that your definition of 'thug' is perfect for your perspective.
 
Lursa said:
Your inferences for my post are all incorrect. But carry on...I agree that your definition of 'thug' is perfect for your perspective.
Click to expand...

I forgot to mention that Manson served 7 years for pimping women. But he was white, so he must not be a thug. :doh
 
truthatallcost said:
I forgot to mention that Manson served 7 years for pimping women. But he was white, so he must not be a thug. :doh
Click to expand...

And yet...still fits my definition. Odd that you think words have mutually exclusive definitions. As I said...feel free to reduce to as much simplicity as you need to.
 
Lursa said:
And yet...still fits my definition. Odd that you think words have mutually exclusive definitions. As I said...feel free to reduce to as much simplicity as you need to.
Click to expand...

God.. The guy had a tattoo of a swastika on his forehead for crying out loud. Still not a thug, huh? Maybe white privilege is real after all. This convo may have changed my perspective..
 
Bucky said:
So, being black makes him a "thug type?"

The word "thug" is the new n-word for white people.
Click to expand...

I also do not see this black person being a thug type.
He was a university student who became a murderer.
Thug types do not attend universities.
 
PleasantValley said:
I also do not see this black person being a thug type.
He was a university student who became a murderer.
Thug types do not attend universities.
Click to expand...

It was a junior college and it certainly depends on the school
 
Oborosen said:
You still have yet to somehow prove that this Op is racist.

We are still waiting here.
Click to expand...

Who is "we"? You and your tapeworm?

You closing your eyes and going "la la la" does not change reality.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Who is "we"? You and your tapeworm?

You closing your eyes and going "la la la" does not change reality.
Click to expand...

So instead of showing proof, you throw a limp wristed insult... par for the course when dealing with posters like you it seems.

I say "we" because apart from posting on a forum, which still constitutes a "we" criteria (its sad that I need to explain that), but I also work with a group of people and they are usually audience to my post as our desk are within close enough proximity with one another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom