• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI leaves US targets of Russian hackers in the dark

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,340
Reaction score
82,721
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
FBI leaves US targets of Russian hackers in the dark


By Raphael Satter, Jeff Donn and Desmond Butler | AP
November 27, 2017

AR-171129770.jpg&maxh=400&maxw=667

Traffic along Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington streaks past the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters building

WASHINGTON — The hackers’ targets: The former head of cybersecurity for the U.S. Air Force. An ex-director at the National Security Council. A former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency. All were caught up in a Russian government-aligned cyberespionage campaign. None was warned by the FBI. The bureau repeatedly failed to alert targets of the Russian hacking group known as Fancy Bear despite knowing for more than a year that their personal emails were in the Kremlin’s sights, an Associated Press investigation has found. Three people familiar with the matter — including a current and a former government official — said the FBI has known the details of Fancy Bear’s attempts to break into Gmail inboxes for more than a year. A senior FBI official, who was not authorized to publicly discuss the hacking operation because of its sensitivity, said the bureau had been overwhelmed by an “almost insurmountable problem.”

Some targets of Fancy Bear’s spying said they don’t blame the FBI for not notifying them. “The expectation that the government is going to protect everyone and go back to everyone is false,” said Nicholas Eftimiades, a retired senior technical officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency who teaches homeland security at Pennsylvania State University in Harrisburg and was himself among the targets. But Charles Sowell, who previously worked as a senior administrator in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and was targeted by Fancy Bear two years ago, said there was no reason the FBI couldn’t do the same work the AP did. “It’s absolutely not OK for them to use an excuse that there’s too much data,” said Sowell. “Would that hold water if there were a serial killer investigation, and people were calling in tips left and right, and they were holding up their hands and saying, ‘It’s too much’? “That’s ridiculous.”

If true, it demonstrates the enormity of Kremlin hacking. It also informs on how unprepared the FBI was (and the US government in-toto) for such attacks and a lack of a coherent policy regarding notification.
 
Maybe as simple as an on-going investigation that would be comprised if the FBI notified targets?
People in high risk jobs need to take all possible precautions and try to protect the systems and
data they have access to.

The FBI alone can not solve this issue.
 
FBI leaves US targets of Russian hackers in the dark




If true, it demonstrates the enormity of Kremlin hacking. It also informs on how unprepared the FBI was (and the US government in-toto) for such attacks and a lack of a coherent policy regarding notification.

If false, it demonstrates how consistent the fear-mongering about Russia really is. It demonstrates how people will believe pretty much anything they are told by authority figures.
 
Maybe as simple as an on-going investigation that would be comprised if the FBI notified targets?
People in high risk jobs need to take all possible precautions and try to protect the systems and
data they have access to.

The FBI alone can not solve this issue.

True. If you've completed an SF-86 and received a security clearance, particularly a high level one, you'd be well advised to be alert to any potential compromise. Some personal responsibility is necessary. That alone may not prevent compromise, but expecting the FBI to notify you in every instance is unreasonable. OTOH, when the FBI knows a compromise has occurred, or is likely to, it would be helpful if some notification is made to those known to have high security clearances, in particular.

Our SF-86 database has been hacked, and people should be aware that information will be used.
 
Back
Top Bottom