• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White woman punched by black cop

I don't think the slap at the back of his head was the problem; it was when she backhanded him in the face on the second swing. She now has a felony record, lol, and quite frankly deserved the response she got, in my opinion.
 
Errr...wut? Police don't get to slug people in the face on weak justification. The OP is right. If it was switched, it would be on the news.

Weak? He got backhanded across the face. That's not weak. Anyone with a spine would have punched a person backhanding them across the face.
 
Weak? He got backhanded across the face. That's not weak. Anyone with a spine would have punched a person backhanding them across the face.

Not necessarily. Depends on the circumstances and who is involved and if I felt threatened. She was pretty wrecked. I'd have restrained her properly to begin with so i didn't put myself in that situation. Kinda like a kid physically weaker than me lashing out. I wouldn't full on punch a kid in the head/face either. At least I'm consistent I guess.
 
JU4v0XV.gif


Disturbing video: Female Miami fan hits cop, who hits her back during Virginia Tech game | AL.com

Can you imagine if the races were reversed this would be on every national news channel

What's the issue here?
 
Not necessarily. Depends on the circumstances and who is involved and if I felt threatened. She was pretty wrecked. I'd have restrained her properly to begin with so i didn't put myself in that situation. Kinda like a kid physically weaker than me lashing out. I wouldn't full on punch a kid in the head/face either. At least I'm consistent I guess.

There are of course always exceptions to any rule. In this particular instance, I'd have decked her to and I would bet a lot of other people would have also.
 
The OP tried to make the thread about race. Failed though imo because of the justification.

Because the cop is black? And the arrested is white? So the poster feels if it was reversed it would get more media coverage?
 
Because the cop is black? And the arrested is white? So the poster feels if it was reversed it would get more media coverage?

I guess. :shrug: But fact of the matter is that the punch was deserved and the media isn't all that interested in reporting unless there is an actual controversy. Which there isn't here.
 
I guess. :shrug: But fact of the matter is that the punch was deserved and the media isn't all that interested in reporting unless there is an actual controversy. Which there isn't here.

I agree although your redskin icon is offensive and should be ban. Shame on debate politics for allowing such a image SMH. And your a moderator. Shame.
 
The OP tried to make the thread about race. Failed though imo because of the justification.

Plenty of white officers were justified in their actions towards black subjects yet there were still riots over them.
 
Because the cop is black? And the arrested is white? So the poster feels if it was reversed it would get more media coverage?

BLM would be burning down Coral Gables right now if the races were reversed
 
Why does race come into this picture? The suspect struck a cop...twice. She should get charged to the max and buried.
 
She went limp real fast after he tagged her. :lamo

She will have a little more than a hangover as a reward for her stupidity.
 
I agree although your redskin icon is offensive and should be ban. Shame on debate politics for allowing such a image SMH. And your a moderator. Shame.

Your icon offends me and should be banned.
 
Plenty of white officers were justified in their actions towards black subjects yet there were still riots over them.

Yep, and whites riot over stupid stuff also. :shrug: Either way, it is irrelevant to this case and you're doing nothing more than race baiting imo.
 
I agree although your redskin icon is offensive and should be ban. Shame on debate politics for allowing such a image SMH. And your a moderator. Shame.

The redskins football logo is quite legit. The team was ran and played by Native Americans and iirc the coach, who was Native American, came up with the name. Only a minority of Native Americans find it offensive. Probably because they don't know this history of the team or the fact that it was Native Americans that first coined the term even before the football team was created. There are plenty of legitimate offensive terms out there that one can rail against. This isn't one of them.
 
The redskins football logo is quite legit. The team was ran and played by Native Americans and iirc the coach, who was Native American, came up with the name. Only a minority of Native Americans find it offensive. Probably because they don't know this history of the team or the fact that it was Native Americans that first coined the term even before the football team was created. There are plenty of legitimate offensive terms out there that one can rail against. This isn't one of them.

1933 news article refutes cherished tale that Redskins were named to honor Indian coach - The Washington Post
 
Yep, and whites riot over stupid stuff also. :shrug: Either way, it is irrelevant to this case and you're doing nothing more than race baiting imo.

Drawing comparisons to other situations is now "race baiting"?
 
Drawing comparisons to other situations is now "race baiting"?

Drawing comparisons is quite valid. When used appropriately. This is not an appropriate case. If you want to draw a valid comparison then find a case of abuse that isn't legit. More will care about it.
 
Out of millions of names that were available...why'd he pick Redskins?

Did you even read the article?

the ****ing article you couldnt be bothered to read said:
Marshall explains, he gave up “Braves” to avoid confusion with a Boston professional baseball team of the same name. He apparently picked the Redskins name so he could keep the existing Native American logo.
 
Weak? He got backhanded across the face. That's not weak. Anyone with a spine would have punched a person backhanding them across the face.

Sorry, no. There were a bunch of officers on her. As an officer you don't get to punch people in the face under such a weak argument. A private citizen would've been within their technical rights but it still would've been weak if you were rolling with a bunch of your buddies and you felt threatened enough by a girl to knock her out. Wonder what kind of trauma she had from getting hit in the face, very likely broken facial bones. I'm guessing you don't have much training in escalation of force.
 
Disturbing video: Female Miami fan hits cop, who hits her back during Virginia Tech game | AL.com

Can you imagine if the races were reversed this would be on every national news channel

Focusing so much on race and perceived differences in treatment is part of the problem. Each incident should be evaluated individually by what happened.

Having said that, I have no issue whatsoever with him hitting her like that. She whacked him first... twice. His hit was just enough to get her to stop. He didn't keep wailing on her like we see in some videos.
 
Back
Top Bottom